Skip to main content
Environmental Sciences Europe
Download PDF

Review: mountain lakes as freshwater resources at risk from chemical pollution

Environmental Sciences Europe volume 35, Article number: 3 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Chemical pollution forms a severe threat for human and environmental health. While the risks for European lowland water bodies are well known, there is little knowledge on remote aquatic ecosystems and particularly mountain lakes, despite their importance for the provision of freshwater. Here, we critically review the current knowledge on the exposure and risk by chemical pollution for mountain lakes and present a tiered approach on how to advance effectively our understanding in the future.

Results

Generally, pollutant monitoring data are currently incomplete, with many regions and substances having been only poorly investigated. More reliable data exist only for persistent organic pollutants (POPs). However, there is increasing evidence that even remote mountain lakes are exposed to a wide range of organic pollutants. Among them potent pesticides currently used in agricultural and biocidal applications, such as diazinon and permethrin. The exposure of mountain lakes to pollutants follows a complex pattern. Pollutants are introduced into mountain lakes via the atmospheric deposition and run-off from the watershed, but also local sources, like tourism and pastoralism. Our risk assessment and recent biomonitoring studies suggest that there are widespread chronic toxic risks on crustacean in mountain ranges. If mountain ranges are exposed to tourism and pastoralism, even acute toxic effects on crustacean are possible. Thereby, the vulnerability of mountain lakes to toxic effects has to be expected to be particularly high due to the harsh environmental conditions at high altitudes, the organism’s traits, the insular position of mountain lakes and a lower species richness with increasing altitudes. Furthermore, there is little knowledge on the biological processes leading to the degradation of chemical pollutants under the environmental and ecological conditions of mountain ecosystems.

Conclusion

While the exposure and sensitivity of mountain aquatic ecosystems is currently poorly investigated, the existing data suggest that it is very likely that also water bodies as remote as mountain lakes do suffer from pollution-induced toxicity. To verify this suggestion and expand the existing knowledge, it is necessary that future studies combine a more holistic pollution monitoring with exposure modelling and links to biological effects. Only then will it be possible to obtain a more reliable understanding of the impact of chemical pollution on aquatic mountain ecosystems and to protect these fragile ecosystems.

Introduction

Human activities are degrading ecosystems to an extent that they become dysfunctional and lose their capacity to provide ecosystem services [1,2,3]. One of the most important ecosystem services is the provision of drinking water. Freshwater provision is also at the basis of numerous other ecosystem services, such as agricultural production, tourism, and the production of construction material. Mountains are the water towers of the world and provide freshwater to more than half of the world’s population [4]. Protecting the health of mountain catchments is thus essential to safeguard the provision of high-quality freshwater and human well-being. A central characteristic of many mountain catchments are lakes. Mountain lakes are present in most mountain ranges, where they act as freshwater storage basins and are generally very biodiversity rich in comparison to terrestrial habitats [5]. They are, however, highly sensitive to anthropogenic impacts like chemical and nutrient pollution, climate change and habitat destruction, which in synergy put them at risk to become dysfunctional and to degrade their ecological state [5,6,7].

At low altitudes, the pollutants emitted by agricultural, urban, and industrial activities are known to degrade the ecological state of the aquatic environment [8, 9]. With increasing altitude, these sources are considered to become less, which should result in a limited exposure towards chemical pollution and hence no degradation of mountain water bodies by organic chemicals. However, at the example of the Arctic and Antarctic, it has been shown that atmospheric long-range transport and marine currents [10], as well as migrating species [11, 12], cause a global pollutant spread. As a result, organic chemicals, and persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in particular, have accumulated in arctic regions and impact wildlife and human health [13, 14]. In mountains, local economic activities, such as tourism [15], recreational angling [16], the exploitation of natural resources [17] and pastoralism [18, 19] have the potential to introduce or release pollutants into mountain lakes. Since the distance to source regions in many mountains is much shorter than in the arctic, also less persistent chemical pollutants (e.g., agricultural pesticides) enter mountain environments by atmospheric transport [20]. Furthermore, mountain lakes appear to be particularly vulnerable to chemical pollution, due to very harsh living conditions [6, 21] and the short and unbranched food webs that are characterized by specialized and sensitive top predators, such as amphibians, birds of prey, and introduced fish [21]. As a result, organic chemicals do not only lead to a widespread degradation of aquatic ecosystems at low altitudes [8, 9], but also in the mountain environment to a yet unknown extent.

Chemical pollution drives important changes in mountain lakes and disturbs their sensitive ecological equilibrium. With increasing impact and degradation, these ecosystems will become more and more dysfunctional, reducing their ability to provide the ecosystem service of clean drinking water. To mitigate this risk, it is essential to strengthen our knowledge on the exposure to and impacts by complex chemical mixtures on mountain lakes. Therefore, it is important to go beyond data-rich regions, like the lowland water bodies of Europe and North America, and collect more data on the impact of pollution on remote water bodies, like mountain ecosystems [22, 23].

Here, we synthesized the current knowledge on the exposure to and risk by chemical pollution in mountain lakes. This has been done along different lines of evidence including: (i) a toxic unit (TU) based assessment of mixture toxicity risks under the use of existing exposure monitoring data [24, 25]; (ii) the discussion of plausible pathways of exposure via atmospheric deposition and from local sources; (iii) the collection of evidence on toxic impacts in mountain lakes; and (iv) the discussion of habitat characteristics possibly enhancing the vulnerability of mountain lake ecosystems.

Mixture toxicity risks based on monitoring data

To assess the toxic risk for aquatic organisms in mountain lakes by chemical pollution, a dataset with water monitoring data was compiled, including 17 studies providing water concentration data (Table 1; Fig. 3). Additionally, one study could be found that offered surface sediment pollution data for 14 lakes in the Sierra Nevada Mountains (California, USA) and allowed for the calculation of equilibrium water concentrations, as also the total sediment organic carbon content had been determined (Additional file 1) [26]. However, water monitoring data on the contamination of mountain lakes with organic chemicals were scarce and scattered.

Table 1 Overview of studies documenting water concentration data for mountain lakes from different parts of the world
Full size table

The obtained dataset includes data on a total of 36 different lakes of 11 different mountain ranges and countries, extending from the year 1994 to 2018. Most studies were performed in the Sierra Nevada Mountains, the Rocky Mountains, and the Pyrenees. Investigated were very small (0.1 ha) to very big lakes like Nam Co Lake in Tibet (201500 ha). Thereby, the presence of a total of 174 compounds was reported, including 16 legacy pesticides and their degradation products, 51 current-use pesticides (15 herbicides, 24 fungicides and 12 insecticides), 21 PAHs, 15 PCBs, 9 brominated diphenyl ethers (BDEs) that are used as flame retardants, 4 pharmaceuticals, 5 compounds commonly used in sunscreens and 53 compounds of various uses. In the most holistic monitoring study, passive sampling was combined with an extensive target screening of 479 substances, including chemicals potentially introduced via local sources and atmospheric deposition (Table 1, Machate et al. [19]). Most other studies focused only on POPs. The best investigated substances, which have been investigated in more than 6 different studies and mountain ranges, are hexachlorobenzene (HCB), alpha-endosulfan, beta-endosulfan and endosulfan sulfate, as well as alpha and gamma-hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH). Only 16 substances have been investigated in more than two mountain ranges. This includes six PCBs, nine legacy pesticides and their metabolites, as well as one current-use pesticide (chlorpyrifos).

The available water pollution concentration data were used to estimate the existing toxic risk for algae and crustacea, two organisms of central importance in mountain lake food webs [6]. Toxic risks were assessed by calculating the individual TU for each compound at each site and finally these individual TUs per site were added together to obtain a cumulative TU, representing the mixture toxic risk at a given site at a certain time point based on the compounds analysed (Eq. 1) [19, 24, 25]:

$$\sum TU= \sum \frac{{c}_{i, water}}{{EC}_{xi}},$$
(1)

where ci,water is the water concentration of the analyte \(i\) and \({EC}_{x}\) is its effect concentration (\(EC\)) at level \(x\). ECs were calculated as the 0.05 quantiles (Q 0.05) of the effect levels that could be obtained from the US EPA ECOTOX Knowledgebase (release version 09 December 2019) for exposure times of up to 120 h and including data on no observable effect levels (NOEL), the lowest effect levels (LOEL), and EC10 up to EC90 for algae and crustacea [27, 28]. If no measured entry was available, the EC50-value was estimated by using the baseline ECOSAR 1.0 type model [29, 30] in ChemProp v6.7.1 [31]. For this the baseline ECOSAR-type QSAR was used, whereat the QSAR was group-specific [28]. All ECs used during the assessment and their origin can be found in AF sheet 4. To assess the likelihood of adverse effects and display the risk that has been caused by the individual compounds, TUs and ΣTUs were compared with thresholds for acute (0.1 TUs for both organisms) and chronic (0.02 TUs for algae; 0.001 TUs for crustacea) toxic effects [8].

In a comprehensive investigation of a broad range of chemicals in Pyrenean lakes [19] mixture risks of 1 × 10–3 to 0.01 ∑TUs were reported for algae. Thus, maximum mixture toxic risk approaches about 50% of the threshold assumed for chronic toxicity (0.02 TUs). Considering uncertainty, due to non-analysed mixture components, temporal deviations and uncertainties related to sampling and analysis, a factor of 2 is a tiny buffer even if the findings do not support a chronic risk based on the analytical results. For crustacea, TUs ranged from 1 × 10–3 to 0.25 ∑TUs, thus exceeding the thresholds for acute (0.1 TUs) and chronic toxic risks (0.001 TUs) in 25% and 100% of their samples. In this study, the drivers of toxicity towards crustacea were the insecticides diazinon, and permethrin. For the remaining studies, which only assessed relatively small sets of pollutants, the mixture toxic risk ranged from 8.9 × 10–8 to 0.08 ∑TUs for algae and 3.4 × 10–7 to 9.5 ∑TUs for crustacea with a median of 6.7 × 10–6 ∑TUs and 1.4 × 10 −4 ∑TUs, respectively (Fig. 1; AF sheet 4). The thresholds for acute and chronic toxic risks to crustacea were breached in 3 and 29% of the samples. Based on their median TUs, the main drivers of toxicity towards crustacea are the insecticides diazinon, malathion and chlorpyrifos with 3.4 TUs (detections n = 4), 0.16 TUs (n = 1) and 0.03 TUs (n = 34), respectively. Also, the flame-retardant BDE 209 reveals a relatively high median of 0.03 TUs (n = 4). The calculated TUs for algae never exceeded the thresholds for acute toxic risks, and only in 2% of the samples the thresholds for chronic toxic risks were exceeded. The highest median toxicity was caused by the flame-retardant BDE-209 with 0.03 TUs (n = 4). In individual cases, also the two herbicides triallate and trifluralin contributed slightly higher amounts of TUs.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Toxic risk by organic chemicals for crustaceans and algae in mountain lakes. TUs calculated from water concentrations stated in various studies (Table 1, except Machate et al. [19]) investigating the chemical pollution of mountain lakes from different parts of the world. “Mixture” displays the predicted mixture toxic risk of all compounds that have been measured at a given site (∑TUs). Below, the individual toxic risks caused by each individual compound is displayed (TU) and they were sorted according to their median TUs (increasing from bottom to top). Thresholds for chronic and acute toxic risk are displayed in the form of a dashed and solid grey line, respectively

Full size image

In the following paragraphs, the here obtained risk information will be compared towards the results of the currently most comprehensive risk assessment on the risk for mountain lakes by organic chemicals [19] and discussed in the context of the currently available knowledge on organic chemicals in mountain lakes.

Atmospheric deposition causes chronic toxic risks

The concept of organic chemicals being effectively transferred from metropolitan, industrial and agricultural areas into the mountain environment via atmospheric long- and medium-range transport is well established [20, 21]. The wet and gaseous deposition of more volatile compounds, as well as the deposition of particles carrying chemicals of little volatility (e.g., current-use pesticides), can lead to a direct introduction of organic chemicals from the atmosphere into mountain lakes (Fig. 2) [48]. As a result, mountain aquatic ecosystems closer to urbanized regions are exposed to a wide variety of POPs and PAHs, current-use agricultural pesticides, musks, and various other chemicals [19, 40, 49]. It has been described that, due to the colder temperatures at higher altitude, precipitation acts as an effective pump for water-soluble compounds from the atmosphere into mountain lakes and their catchment [50]. The water–air partitioning coefficient (Kwa) is a measure of how easily a compound can disperse between air and water and, therefore, influences the tendency of a compound to undergo wet deposition. Chemicals with a Kwa between 3.5 and 4 have the highest potential to be scavenged by precipitation and thus the highest mountain contamination potential [51, 52]. These chemicals are sufficiently volatile to reach high altitudes, as they are not efficiently scavenged by precipitation at moderate temperatures at lower altitudes, while at the same time not being too volatile to not being scavenged at colder temperatures at high altitudes. In addition to the direct deposition of organic chemicals from the atmosphere into the lakes, chemicals can also be deposited onto the surface of the catchment and consecutively be transported downslope into the next mountain lake [20]. This especially becomes effective when temperatures are cold enough that precipitation occurs in the form of snow. Snow possesses a scavenging efficiency that is higher for most compounds and especially for larger, non-polar organic compounds, than the one of rain [51, 53]. Furthermore, it allows for the accumulation of larger amounts of precipitation in form of snow and ice in mountain catchments, along with the pollutants associated to them [42, 50, 54]. This way snow leads to an increased transport and build-up of organic pollutants in the mountain environment. As these pollutants are then released into downstream lakes quicker than the time it took for them to build up—either during the melting of seasonal snowpacks [54,55,56] or the climate change-driven ice melt of glaciers [42, 57, 58]—this leads to a higher exposure and hence risk for mountain lakes by organic chemicals than during other precipitation events (e.g., rain and fog). For glaciers, for example, it has been shown that the organic chemicals contained in their meltwater can pose a toxic risk to aquatic invertebrates [59]. This can be assumed to occur in the same or even higher extent during mountain spring-season, when pollutants accumulated in seasonal snowpacks are released within a relatively short period of time and thus more rapidly than from glaciers, thereby endangering biodiversity.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Atmospheric transport of organic pollutants into mountain environments, and the input and loss of organic chemicals from the waters of mountain lakes. Included pollutants sources are atmospherically deposited pollutants that directly or indirectly introduced into mountain lakes, as well as pollutants from local activities like pastoralism and tourism. Not displayed are degradation processes or topographic and climatic features that can also affect pollutant transport and deposition, as well as their accumulation in lakes. LRAT long-range atmospheric transport; MRAT medium-range atmospheric transport; and SRAT short-range atmospheric transport (e.g., local wildfires)

Full size image

Various factors influence how exposed a certain mountain lake is towards atmospheric pollutants, whereat the proximity towards pollution sources is the most important [50]. Since pollution levels in mountain lakes are closely related to those in the atmosphere [60] and air quality is worse in closer proximity to source regions [50], mountain slopes and lakes adjacent to regional source regions show considerably higher levels of pollution compared to slopes averted or remote to source regions [61,62,63]. In addition, also climatic parameters are of importance when trying to understand the exposure of mountain lakes. Generally, lowering temperatures and rising precipitation with increasing altitude (Fig. 2) favour the deposition and accumulation of chemical pollutants at higher elevations, which is suggesting increasing chemical concentrations towards the mountain summit. In the actual mountain environment, however, this pattern has not been found consistently [20]. Likely source proximity, the complex mountain terrain, which leads to an uneven distribution of precipitation and incoming air within a given mountain range [64, 65], together with the compound and lake properties [20, 66], lead to complex and variable pollutant distribution. Current knowledge [67, 68] suggests that lower altitudes are more influenced by regional emissions (e.g., current-use pesticides) via regional air circulations that are facilitating medium-range atmospheric transport. Alpine regions, in contrast, are predominantly affected by long-range atmospheric transport that is introducing more persistent substances or particle bound compounds. Accordingly, in most cases mountain lakes at high altitudes, and/or located in mountains remote to urban activities, can be expected to be less polluted by atmospheric pollutants than mountain lakes at lower altitude and/or greater proximity to human activities [33, 69]. While this suggests a higher toxic risk for mountain lakes at lower altitudes, this also implies that even remote (alpine) mountain lakes are exposed to and potentially at risk by organic chemicals released at lower altitudes. In addition to the spatial differences, temporal fluctuations of atmospheric transport and pollutant levels are further complicating the pollution patterns in mountain areas. Seasonal shifts in climate and air circulation, as well as pollutant source activity, cause temporal variations in atmospheric pollutant levels and deposition processes [20]. Furthermore, seasonal and climate change-driven temperature fluctuations also cause events like the seasonal snowmelt and influence the properties of the lakes (e.g., no interaction with the atmosphere while being covered with ice). As a result, pollutant levels in mountain lakes fluctuate over time and are difficult to predict. To correctly evaluate the risk for aquatic habitats in mountains by the atmospheric deposition of organic chemicals is therefore challenging.

Based on the risk assessment by Machate et al. [19]─which provided new insights into the diversity of organic chemicals that can be found in mountain lakes by using a time-integrated sampling method and covering a large spatial extent of the French Pyrenees—the levels of organic chemicals introduced via atmospheric deposition are sufficiently high to cause chronic toxic effects towards crustacea in all lakes under investigation. Also when looking at the results of the here performed risk assessment, almost one third of the investigated lakes experience a chronic toxic risk. Taking into account that most of the considered studies only included a relatively small set of target pollutants (mostly POPs) and utilized grab samples, thereby neglecting relevant drivers of toxicity (e.g., chlorpyrifos) (Fig. 1) and temporal variations, it is very likely that the actual toxic risk is higher than predicted here. Furthermore, water concentration data are missing for mountain lakes and regions that are known to be considerably polluted with organic chemicals (Fig. 3, details in Additional file 1). This applies for example to the Tatra mountains. Studies investigating their pollution history revealed sediment burdens with PAHs and DDT that are similar to those of urban areas and higher than what has been discovered in other mountain lakes [70,71,72]. Therefore, it cannot be ruled out that regions exist where pollution is more severe than suggested based on the risk assessment performed here or by Machate et al. [19]. Generally, the current data suggest that organic pollutants introduced via atmospheric deposition are likely to cause widespread chronic toxic risks in mountain lakes. However, the currently available monitoring data likely underestimate the toxic risks, also due to the fact that accurate chemical monitoring strategies are difficult to perform in such a remote and difficult to access habitat.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Development of sediment concentrations in ng/g d.w. of different persistent organic micropollutants in various mountain lakes of the world over time. Development of A ∑PAH concentrations, B ∑PCB concentrations and C ∑DDT concentrations. Vertical lines represent points of reference and show average concentrations of the 1970s and − 90 s in lakes of the U.S. in urban (dashed line), light urban (dotted line) and remote areas (solid line) (Additional file 1: Table S2)

Full size image

Local sources cause acute toxic risks

Local emission sources of organic chemicals in mountain areas have been widely neglected, as urban settlements and conventional agricultural practices are mostly absent at high altitudes. However, local anthropogenic activities like mining, charcoal production, tourism, and pastoralism are practised in mountains since a long time (Fig. 2) [73, 74]. While mining mainly introduced inorganic pollutants into the mountain environment [17], tourists can introduce contaminants like pharmaceuticals, personal care products and insect repellents [15], plastics [75], and PAHs (e.g., through car travel) [58, 76]. Although not investigated yet, it is to be expected that the input of chemicals by tourists is increased especially where there are mountain refuges and huts, as these frequently attract higher amounts of tourists and often only have a rudimentary wastewater treatment system. Additionally, also other local activities, like the practices of pastoralism (releasing of cattle into the mountains over the summer), laying fires to keep landscapes open, and the introduction of fish, are known to introduce pollutants into mountain lakes [16, 19, 77, 78].

Only few studies provide insights into the risk and impact by local pollution sources on mountain lakes. For the French Pyrenees, Machate et al. [19] report an acute toxic risk for and impact on crustacean communities in mountain lakes, due to the introduction of the highly toxic compounds diazinon and permethrin through local sources (livestock and tourism). Via the here performed risk assessment it was possible to identify another study, performed in different mountain lakes of the Sierra Nevada in California, where insecticides (malathion and diazinon) could be detected at concentrations that suggest local sources and cause an acute toxic risk for the present crustacean communities (Fig. 1) [33]. Acute toxic risks from the input of insecticides by local sources are therefore not only a phenomenon of the Pyrenees, but likely also affects mountain lakes in other mountain ranges of the world. While more data are needed to fully comprehend the extent of this risk, this demonstrates that acute toxic risks for water bodies cannot only be found in populated lowland regions, but also in waterbodies of remote mountain areas.

Evidence for toxic impacts by chemical pollution in mountain lakes

Various studies demonstrated that pollution-induced toxicity causes biological responses in aquatic mountain organisms and their populations. Their results showed: (1) a widespread estrogenic activity in sediments of 83 European mountain lakes, ranging from Norway to the Pyrenees and Eastern Europe [79]; (2) a background fish feminization in a lake from the Tatras and the Pyrenees, identified by investigating the expression of oestrogen receptors and zona radiata genes in male fish [80]; (3) an expression of the Cytochrome P450 1A enzyme in fish of European mountain lakes, indicating a widespread impact by pollution on aquatic organisms of European mountains [81]; (4) altered zooplankton communities with reduced numbers of crustacea in mountain lakes of the French Pyrenees [19]; (5) in situ effects in frogs from the Sierra Nevada Mountains (California, USA), including an increased mortality, slower developmental rates and lowered cholinesterase activities in more polluted mountain regions [82], and (6) multiple studies suggesting that pesticide pollution drives frog population declines in the Sierra Nevada Mountains [83,84,85,86,87]. It is now known that the fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) caused the observed amphibian decline in the Sierra Nevada and many other parts of the world [88]. However, considering the number of studies suggesting a cause–effect relationship between pesticide pollution and declining frog populations at high altitudes, pollution and Bd-driven declines are likely linked. Chemical pollution might have increased the Bd infection rate by weakening the immune system of frogs and reducing the abundance of aquatic predators that otherwise consume Bd zoospores and, thereby, reduce infection pressure on amphibians [89, 90]. This notion is supported by other studies, which confirm that an increased success of infectious diseases might be linked to pollution [91]. However, more studies on the cause–effect relationships between pathogen outbreaks and pollution are required to confirm this observation.

Therefore, similar to the results of the here performed TU-based risk assessment, also studies that looked at biological indicators support the idea of widespread toxic effects, and especially chronic toxic effects, on aquatic organisms in mountains. While also in this regard more studies will be required to allow for a reliable conclusion, these results agree with findings made in the polar regions. Similar to the Arctic, also mountainous areas have been shown to act as focusing regions for POPs with reported concentrations being similar or even slightly higher than in the Arctic [21]. Considering that similar concentrations of POPs cause severe adverse effects on the wildlife at the top of the arctic food-chain (e.g., immune system suppression, endocrine disruption, and carcinogenicity as well as impacts on behaviour, reproduction, and development) [13, 14], we may assume that aquatic organisms in the mountain environment are similarly impacted by pollution-induced adverse effects. A negative effect on the health of aquatic mountain organisms due to chemical pollution is therefore very likely.

Habitat characteristics affect vulnerability towards and fate of chemical pollution

Mountain habitats exhibit unique characteristics. While currently little explored, these characteristics have the potential to cause aquatic ecosystems to be more vulnerable to pollution. The harsh living conditions include cold temperatures, thin air, low nutrient levels, high UV radiation, as well as long winters and short summers [6], which are known to strongly enhance the sensitivity of organisms to pollution by a factor of up to 100 [92,93,94,95]. Furthermore, increased UV radiation and clear mountain lake waters may enhance toxicity of compounds that are susceptible for photoactivation, such as PAHs [96, 97]. To endure the harsh living conditions in the mountain environment, organisms have developed certain traits such as increased longevity, higher lipid contents and slower growth rates [21]. While necessary to survive at high altitudes, these traits favour the bioaccumulation of organic chemicals in the organisms and increase internal concentrations [21, 55, 98,99,100]. This effect is probably magnified by the typically oligotrophic conditions in mountain lakes. Under such conditions, (planktonic) organisms represent the highest amount of total organic matter in the lake and nutrient cycling is highly efficient. This causes an increased and extended exposure of present organisms while sedimentation is reduced [101, 102]. In addition, mountain lake food webs are typically short and unbranched with highly specialized top predators [21]. In such food webs, biomagnification of POPs in top predators is particularly severe, resulting in a great ecotoxicological risk for those species [13]. Similar risks were reported for organisms that live close to or temporarily in mountain lakes (amphibians and birds of prey) [66, 103] and likely also apply for waterborne organisms [21, 43]. However, some studies also obtained results that deviated from this assumption [104, 105]. Something that is likely caused by differences in feeding habits and the zone of the lake organisms inhabit (pelagic vs benthic), which lead to a more complex exposure scenario of the present organisms and may make it difficult to demonstrate the effect of biomagnification.

Furthermore, the very secluded and patchy landscape of mountains may cause a higher sensitivity of mountain organism populations to pollution events. For example, disconnected mountain lakes form insular ecosystems [54], where a re-colonization from intact populations of neighbouring water bodies is hampered. Thus, the recovery of a mountain lake after a toxicity event is strongly hindered [106]. The ability to recover is likely further reduced by the slow growth rates that prevail at high altitudes [21]. Consequently, recovery processes are likely to be slow or even incomplete in case a species has been lost. Considering that mountain lakes constitute relatively simple systems with a low functional redundancy, the introduction of organic chemicals poses a great risk for their overall functioning and health [107].

The special habitat characteristics prevailing in mountain landscapes might not only impact the vulnerability of their aquatic ecosystems, but also cause pollutants to accumulate in mountain lakes. Mountain watersheds are often characterized by a very limited soil development and generally extremely low organic carbon contents [6]. This reduces the ability of the catchment to effectively retain organic chemicals and support their mobilization and accumulation in downstream mountain lakes [10, 20, 56]. Especially mountain lakes with longer water residence times or a closer ratio between lake size and the size of their watershed, have a higher potential to accumulate pollutants [66]. That potential may be further enhanced by the prevailing low temperature that reduces the volatilization of compounds into the atmosphere [50]. In addition, low temperatures also reduce the efficacy of hydrolysis and biodegradation processes [108], likely increasing the build-up of chemical pollutants in mountain lakes. However, as the levels of UV radiation increase with increasing altitude and due to the fact that the water of mostly oligotrophic mountain lakes is very clean, which allows the water to be penetrated to a greater depth by the incoming radiation, this may lead to an increased efficacy of photodegradation processes [6, 109], which might partly counteract the tendency of chemical accumulation. Nevertheless, all in all the prevailing environmental conditions render mountain lakes as a focusing point and effective sink for organic chemicals in the mountain environment. Something that has also been observed by few studies [41, 54, 70].

Conclusion and research needs

Currently, the knowledge on the risk for mountain lakes by chemical pollution is limited. Neither their exposure nor their sensitivity is explored sufficiently. Similar to lowland waterbodies, mountain lakes are exposed to a complex mixture of organic chemicals via local activities and atmospheric deposition. This chemical cocktail can cause acute or chronic toxic risks for aquatic organisms with cascading effects potentially affecting the whole mountain environment, including, e.g., water quality. These risks may be enhanced by the specific habitat conditions and the possibly greater vulnerability of mountain organisms to chemical pollution. Considering the importance of aquatic mountain lake ecosystems for the global supply with drinking water, more efforts are needed to monitor chemical pollution and its impact on mountain lake ecosystems on a regional, continental, and global scale. Only then will it be possible to close the existing knowledge gaps and preserve these ecosystems and their services for future generations.

The assessment of chemical risks for mountain lakes is hampered most by the lack of monitoring data and hence exposure information (Table 1). In a mountain context, only few lakes, regions and compounds have been investigated so far. Future chemical monitoring needs to go substantially beyond POPs well-known for atmospheric transport, since recent studies indicated that unexpected compounds from local sources may have the potential to drive toxic risks in mountain lakes [19]. State-of-the-art LC–HRMS and GC–HRMS target, suspect and non-target-screening [110, 111], together with effect-based monitoring [112, 113], are needed to allow for a comprehensive monitoring of complex mixtures and help to better characterize chemical pollution and possible toxic risks and effects in mountain lakes. Thereby, low chemical concentrations, which demand for a sample enrichment, and logistic challenges of transport and preservation of large water volumes in remote areas, need to be overcome by utilizing passive sampling techniques. These techniques allow for time-integrated sampling of a broad range of pollutants, including substances with effect concentrations in the nanogram per litre range [114,115,116,117].

The results obtained by these studies need to be used to better understand the spatial distribution of chemical pollution. To this end, it would be helpful to advance existing exposure models. The currently most progressive model is the MCMPOP model, which considers air, soil, precipitation (rain and snow), vegetation, and ice cover in order to understand the transport processes of POPs across the central Himalayas [118]. Future models should include information on short- to long-range atmospheric transport, thereby also considering the mountain-specific distribution of air masses and precipitation, together with local sources and the characteristics of lakes and catchment, asking for high-resolution remote sensing data. By developing such an advanced model, it would be possible to predict those lakes that are most exposed to and hence at the highest risk by chemical pollution. This is currently still difficult, which makes it difficult to plan meaningful exposure monitorings and fully understand the existing toxic risk by chemical pollution. Furthermore, having such models would help to develop a better understanding of how global climate and land use changes will alter the future exposure and toxic risk for mountain lakes by organic chemicals [119]. Knowledge that is still lacking, but crucially needed in order to be able to effectively protect and maintain the health of mountain lakes. Another obstacle that needs to be overcome in order to fully understand the risk for mountain lakes by chemical pollution is the uncertainty around the sensitivity of their organisms. Based on their characteristics, organisms in mountain lakes are likely to be more vulnerable to chemical pollution. Standard toxicity tests are, however, done under laboratory conditions, which is likely leading to an underestimation of the prevailing toxic risk when using EC to assess the prevailing risk. Therefore, improved exposure modelling and monitoring needs to be complemented by a better understanding of the impact of chemical pollution on mountain lake ecosystems and their biodiversity under multiple stress conditions. Therefore, investigations on the ecotoxicity of relevant pollutants, and mixtures thereof, under realistic stress conditions are urgently needed. Relevant stressors include traditional environmental stressors like high ultraviolet radiation, cold temperatures and food shortage [96, 120, 121], but also pathogens [122, 123] and climate change scenarios [124], and should be supported by predictive models on multiple stresses [95]. Also paleolimnological studies could be useful, since they allow to understand the impact of chemical pollution over longer periods of time and help to reconstruct how mountain lake ecosystems looked like before the introduction of anthropogenic organic chemicals [125, 126].

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional file. Furthermore, they can also be found in the data repository Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7013722).

Abbreviations

POPs:

Persistent organic pollutants

TU:

Toxic unit

SI:

Supplementary information

BDEs:

Brominated diphenyl ethers

HCB:

Hexachlorobenzene

HCH:

Hexachlorocyclohexane

AF:

Additional file

OCs:

Organochlorine pesticides

CUPs:

Current-use pesticides

PAHs:

Polyaromatic hydrocarbons

PCBs:

Polychlorinated biphenyls

EC:

Effect concentration

NOEL:

No observable effect levels

LOEL:

Lowest effect levels

NOEC:

No observable effect concentration

LOEC:

Lowest observable effect concentration

Kwa:

Water–air partitioning coefficient

Bd:

Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis

References

  1. Crutzen PJ (2016) The “Anthropocene.” In: Ehlers E, Krafft T (eds) Earth system science in the Anthropocene. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 13–18

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, Lambin E et al (2009) Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03180-140232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. United Nations Environment Programme (2021): Making peace with nature. https://www.unep.org/resources/making-peace-nature.

  4. Messerli B, Viviroli D, Weingartner R (2004) Mountains of the world: vulnerable water towers for the 21st century. Ambio Spec No 13:29–34

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schmeller D, Loyau A, Bao K, Brack W, Chatzinotas A, Vleeschouwer F et al (2018) People, pollution and pathogens—global change impacts in mountain freshwater ecosystems. Sci Total Environ 622–623:756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Catalan J, Camarero L, Felip M, Pla S, Ventura M, Buchaca T et al (2006) High mountain lakes: extreme habitats and witnesses of environmental changes. Limnetica 25:551–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Moser KA, Baron JS, Brahney J, Oleksy IA, Saros JE, Hundey EJ et al (2019) Mountain lakes: eyes on global environmental change. Global Planet Change 178:77–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Malaj E, von der Ohe PC, Grote M, Kühne R, Mondy CP, Usseglio-Polatera P et al (2004) Organic chemicals jeopardize the health of freshwater ecosystems on the continental scale. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:9549–9554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Posthuma L, Zijp MC, De Zwart D, Van de Meent D, Globevnik L, Koprivsek M et al (2020) Chemical pollution imposes limitations to the ecological status of European surface waters. Sci Rep 10:14825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Walker CHS, Hopkin RM, Peakall SP (2012) Principles of ecotoxicology. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  11. Janetski DJ, Chaloner DT, Moerke AH, Rediske RR, O’Keefe JP, Lamberti GA (2012) Resident fishes display elevated organic pollutants in salmon spawning streams of the great lakes. Environ Sci Technol 46:8035–8043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Krümmel EM, Gregory-Eaves I, Macdonald RW, Kimpe LE, Demers MJ, Smol JP et al (2005) Concentrations and Fluxes of Salmon-derived polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in lake sediments. Environ Sci Technol 39:7020–7026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. AMAP (1998) Assessment report: Arctic pollution issues. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, Oslo, p xii+859

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bennett JR, Shaw JD, Terauds A, Smol JP, Aerts R et al (2015) Polar lessons learned: long-term management based on shared threats in Arctic and Antarctic environments. Front Ecol Environ 13:316–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Weissinger RH, Blackwell BR, Keteles K, Battaglin WA, Bradley PM (2018) Bioactive contaminants of emerging concern in national park waters of the northern Colorado plateau, USA. Sci Total Environ 636:910–918

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hansson SV, Sonke J, Galop D, Bareille G, Jean S, Le Roux G (2017) Transfer of marine mercury to mountain lakes. Sci Rep 7:12719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Le Roux G, Hansson S, Claustres A, Binet S, Vleeschouwer F, Gandois L et al (2020) Trace metal legacy in mountain environments: a view from the Pyrenees mountains. Wiley, New Jersey, pp 191–206

    Google Scholar 

  18. Breu T, Höggel FU, Rueff H (2015): Sustainable livestock production? Industrial agriculture versus pastoralism. CDE policy brief. 7, CDE Centre for Development and Environment.

  19. Machate O, Schmeller DS, Loyau A, Paschke A, Krauss M, Carmona E et al (2022) Complex chemical cocktail, containing insecticides diazinon and permethrin, drives acute toxicity to crustaceans in mountain lakes. Sci Total Environ 828:154456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Daly GL, Wania F (2005) Organic contaminants in mountains. Environ Sci Technol 39:385–398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kallenborn R (2006) Persistent organic pollutants (POPS) as environmental risk factors in remote high-altitude ecosystems. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 63:100–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Brack W, Escher BI, Müller E, Schmitt-Jansen M, Schulze T, Slobodnik J et al (2018) Towards a holistic and solution-oriented monitoring of chemical status of European water bodies: how to support the EU strategy for a non-toxic environment? Environ Sci Eur 30:33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Brack W, Barcelo Culleres D, Boxall ABA, Budzinski H, Castiglioni S, Covaci A et al (2022) One planet: one health. A call to support the initiative on a global science-policy body on chemicals and waste. Environ Sci Eur 34:21–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Finckh S, Beckers LM, Busch W, Carmona E, Dulio V, Kramer L, Krauss M, Posthuma L, Schulze T, Slootweg J, Von der Ohe PC, Brack W (2022) A risk based assessment approach for chemical mixtures from wastewater treatment plant effluents. Environ Int 164:107234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ginebreda A, Kuzmanovic M, Guasch H, de Alda ML, López-Doval JC, Muñoz I et al (2014) Assessment of multi-chemical pollution in aquatic ecosystems using toxic units: compound prioritization, mixture characterization and relationships with biological descriptors. Sci Total Environ 468–469:715–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bradford DF, Stanley K, McConnell LL, Tallent-Halsell NG, Nash MS, Simonich SM (2010) Spatial patterns of atmospherically deposited organic contaminants at high elevation in the southern Sierra Nevada mountains, California, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 29(5):1056–1066

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Busch W, Schmidt S, Kühne R, Schulze T, Krauss M, Altenburger R (2016) Micropollutants in European rivers: a mode of action survey to support the development of effect-based tools for water monitoring. Environ Toxicol Chem 35:1887–1899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schulze T, Küster E, Schlichting R, Schmitt-Janssen M, Krauss M, Escher B et al (2020) Comparison of novel and current approaches for the target- and non-target screening, effect-based monitoring and prioritisation of river basin specific pollutants to improve future water quality monitoring. Joint Danube Survey Sci Rep 4:395

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mayo-Beana K, Nabholza JV, Meylanb WM, Howard PH (2009): USER’S GUIDE for the ECOSAR Class Program—MS-Windows Version 1.00. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

  30. Nabholz J, Cash G, Meylan W, Howard P (1998): ECOSAR:A computer program for estimating the ecotoxicity of industrial chemicals based on structure activity relationships. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

  31. UFZ Department of Ecological Chemistry (2016): ChemProp 6.3, http://www.ufz.de/ecochem/chemprop.

  32. Datta S, McConnell LL, Baker JE, LeNoir J, Seiber JN (1998) Evidence for atmospheric transport and deposition of polychlorinated biphenyls to the lake Tahoe Basin, California−Nevada. Environ Sci Technol 32(10):1378–1385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. LeNoir JS, McConnell LL, Fellers GM, Cahill TM, Seiber JN (1999) Summertime transport of current-use pesticides from California’s Central Valley to the Sierra Nevada mountain range, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:2715–2722

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bradford DF, Heithmar EM, Tallent-Halsell NG, Momplaisir GM, Rosal CG, Varner KE, Nash MS, Riddick LA (2010) Temporal patterns and sources of atmospherically deposited pesticides in Alpine lakes of the Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Environ Sci Technol 44(12):4609–4614

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Donald DB, Stern GA, Muir DCG, Fowler BR, Miskimmin BM, Bailey R (1998) Chlorobornanes in water, sediment, and fish from toxaphene treated and untreated lakes in Western Canada. Environ Sci Technol 32(10):1391–1397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Blais JM, Schindler DW, Sharp M, Braekevelt E, Lafreniěre M, McDonald K, Muir DCG, Strachan WMJ (2001) Fluxes of semivolatile organochlorine compounds in Bow Lake, a high-altitude, glacier-fed, subalpine lake in the Canadian rocky mountains. Limnol Oceanogr 8:2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wilkinson AC, Kimpe LE, Blais JM (2005) Air-water gas exchange of chlorinated pesticides in four lakes spanning a 1,205 meter elevation range in the Canadian Rocky mountains. Environ Toxicol Chem 24(1):61–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Vilanova R, Fernández P, Martínez C, Grimalt JO (2001) Organochlorine pollutants in remote mountain lake waters. J Environ Qual 30:1286–1295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Fernández P, Carrera G, Grimalt JO (2005) Persistent organic pollutants in remote freshwater ecosystems. Aquat Sci 67:263–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Santolaria Z, Arruebo T, Pardo A et al (2015) Evaluation of airborne organic pollutants in a Pyrenean Glacial lake (The Sabocos Tarn). Water Air Soil Pollut 226:383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nellier YM, Perga ME, Cottin N, Fanget P, Malet E, Naffrechoux E (2015) Mass budget in two high altitude lakes reveals their role as atmospheric PCB sinks. Sci Total Environ 511:203–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wu X, Davie-MC SC, Hageman K, Cullen N, Bogdal C (2017) Understanding and predicting the fate of semivolatile organic pesticides in a glacier-fed lake using a multimedia chemical fate model. Environ Sci Technol 51:11752

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Ren J, Wang X, Wang C, Gong P, Wang X, Yao T (2016) Biomagnification of persistent organic pollutants along a high-altitude aquatic food chain in the Tibetan plateau: processes and mechanisms. Environ Pollut 220:636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ren J, Wang X, Wang C, Gong P, Yao T (2017) Atmospheric processes of organic pollutants over a remote lake on the central Tibetan plateau: implications for regional cycling. Atmos Chem Phys 17:1401–1415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Galassi S, Valsecchi S, Tartari GA (1997) The distribution of PCB’s and chlorinated pesticides in two connected Himalayan Lakes. Water Air Soil Pollut 99:717–725

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Guzzella L, Poma G, Paolis A, Roscioli C, Viviano G (2011) Organic persistent toxic substances in soils, waters and sediments along an altitudinal gradient at Mt. Sagarmatha, Himalayas Nepal. Environ Pollut 159:2552–2564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Shunthirasingham C, Gouin T, Lei Y, Ruepert C, Castillo L, Wania F (2011) Current-use pesticide transport to Costa Rica’s high-altitude tropical cloud forest. Environ Toxicol Chem SETAC 30:2709–2717

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Bogdal C, Scheringer M, Schmid P, Bläuenstein M, Kohler M, Hungerbühler K (2010) Levels, fluxes and time trends of persistent organic pollutants in Lake Thun, Switzerland: combining trace analysis and multimedia modeling. Sci Total Environ 408:3654–3663

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Smalling KL, Fellers GM, Kleeman PM, Kuivila KM (2013) Accumulation of pesticides in pacific chorus frogs (Pseudacris regilla) from California’s Sierra Nevada mountains, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 32:2026–2034

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Wania F (1999) On the origin of elevated levels of persistent chemicals in the environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 6:11–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Wania F, Westgate JN (2008) On the mechanism of mountain cold-trapping of organic chemicals. Environ Sci Technol 42:9092–9098

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Westgate JN, Wania F (2013) Model-based exploration of the drivers of mountain cold-trapping in soil. Environ Sci Process Impacts 15:2220–2232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Lei Y, Wania F (2004) Is rain or snow a more efficient scavenger of organic chemicals? Atmos Environ 38:3557–3571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Meijer S, Dachs J, Fernandez P, Camarero L, Catalan J, Del Vento S, van Drooge BL, Jurado E, Grimalt J (2006) Modelling the dynamic air-water-sediment coupled fluxes and occurrence of polychlorinated biphenyls in a high altitude lake. Environ Pollut 140:546–560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Bizzotto EC, Villa S, Vighi M (2009) POP bioaccumulation in macroinvertebrates of alpine freshwater systems. Environ Pollut 157:3192–3198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Shahpoury P, Hageman KJ, Matthaei CD, Alumbaugh RE, Cook ME (2014) Increased concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in alpine streams during annual snowmelt: investigating effects of sampling method, site characteristics, and meteorology. Environ Sci Technol 48:11294–11301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Bogdal C, Schmid P, Zennegg M, Anselmetti FS, Scheringer M, Hungerbühler K (2009) Blast from the past: melting glaciers as a relevant source for persistent organic pollutants. Environ Sci Technol 43:8173–8177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Guzzella L, Salerno F, Freppaz M, Roscioli C, Pisanello F, Poma G (2016) POP and PAH contamination in the southern slopes of Mt Everest (Himalaya, Nepal): long-range atmospheric transport, glacier shrinkage, or local impact of tourism? Sci Total Environ 544:382–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Rizzi C, Sara V, Luca R, Andrea M, Valeria L (2022) Levels and ecological risk of selected organic pollutants in the high-altitude alpine cryosphere—The Adamello-Brenta natural park (Italy) as a case study. Environ Adv 7:100178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Van Drooge BL, Fernández P, Grimalt JO, Stuchlík E, Torres García CJ, Cuevas E (2010) Atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in remote European and Atlantic sites located above the boundary mixing layer. Environ Sci Pollut Res 17:1207–1216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Hageman KJ, Hafner WD, Campbell DH, Jaffe DA, Landers DH, Simonich SLM (2010) Variability in pesticide deposition and source contributions to snowpack in Western US National parks. Environ Sci Technol 44:4452–4458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. McConnell LL, LeNoir JS, Datta S, Seiber JN (1998) Wet deposition of current-use pesticides in the Sierra Nevada mountain range, California, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:1908–1916

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Usenko S, Landers DH, Appleby PG, Simonich SL (2007) Current and historical deposition of PBDEs, pesticides, PCBs, and PAHs to rocky mountain national park. Environ Sci Technol 41:7235–7241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Appelhans T, Mwangomo E, Otte I, Detsch F, Nauss T, Hemp A (2016) Eco-meteorological characteristics of the southern slopes of Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Int J Climatol 36:3245–3258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Tremolada P, Parolini M, Binelli A, Ballabio C, Comolli R, Provini A (2009) Seasonal changes and temperature-dependent accumulation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in high-altitude soils. Sci Total Environ 407:4269–4277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Elliott JE, Levac J, Guigueno MF, Shaw DP, Wayland M, Morrissey CA et al (2012) Factors influencing legacy pollutant accumulation in alpine osprey: biology, topography, or melting glaciers? Environ Sci Technol 46:9681–9689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Gong P, Wang X-p, Li S-h, Yu W-s, Li J-l, Kattel DB et al (2014) Atmospheric transport and accumulation of organochlorine compounds on the southern slopes of the Himalayas. Nepal Environ Pollut 192:44–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Lavin KS, Hageman KJ (2013) Contributions of long-range and regional atmospheric transport on pesticide concentrations along a transect crossing a mountain divide. Environ Sci Technol 47:1390–1398

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Zabik JM, Seiber JN (1993) Atmospheric transport of organophosphate pesticides from California’s central valley to the Sierra Nevada mountains. J Environ Qual 22:80–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Grimalt JO, van Drooge BL, Ribes A, Vilanova RM, Fernandez P, Appleby P (2004) Persistent organochlorine compounds in soils and sediments of European high altitude mountain lakes. Chemosphere 54:1549–1561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Muri G, Wakeham SG, Faganeli J (2003) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and black carbon in sediments of a remote alpine Lake (Lake Planina, northwest Slovenia). Environ Toxicol Chem 22:1009–1016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Muri G, Wakeham S, Rose N (2006) Records of atmospheric delivery of pyrolysis-derived pollutants in recent mountain lake sediments of the Julian Alps (NW Slovenia). Environ Pollut 139(3):461–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Hansson SV, Claustres A, Probst A, De Vleeschouwer F, Baron S, Galop D, Mazier F, Le Roux G (2017) Atmospheric and terrigenous metal accumulation over 3000 years in a French mountain catchment: Local vs distal influences. Anthropocene 19:45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Le Roux G, Hansson SV, Claustres A, Binet S, De Vleeschouwer F, Gandois L, Mazier F, Simonneau A, Teisserenc R, Allen D, Rosset T, Haver M, Da Ros L, Galop D, Durantez P, Probst A, Sánchez-Pérez JM, Sauvage S, Laffaille P, Jean S, Schmeller DS, Camarero L, Marquer L, Lofts S (2020). Trace Metal Legacy in Mountain Environments, In Biogeochemical Cycles; pp. 191–206.

  75. Wilson S, Verlis K (2017) The ugly face of tourism: Marine debris pollution linked to visitation in the southern Great Barrier Reef Australia. Marine Pollut Bull 117:239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Bradford DF, Stanley KA, Tallent NG, Sparling DW, Nash MS, Knapp RA et al (2013) Temporal and spatial variation of atmospherically deposited organic contaminants at high elevation in yosemite national park, California, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 32:517–525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Bixby RJ, Cooper SD, Gresswell RE, Brown LE, Dahm CN, Dwire KA (2015) Fire effects on aquatic ecosystems: an assessment of the current state of the science. Freshwater Sci 34:1340–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Kelly EN, Schindler DW, St Louis VL, Donald DB, Vladicka KE (2006) Forest fire increases mercury accumulation by fishes via food web restructuring and increased mercury inputs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(51):19380–19385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Garcia-Reyero N, Piña B, Grimalt JO, Fernández P, Fonts R, Polvillo O, Martrat B (2005) Estrogenic activity in sediments from European mountain lakes. Environ Sci Technol 39(6):1427–1435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Jarque S, Quirós L, Grimalt JO, Gallego E, Catalan J, Lackner R, Piña B (2015) Background fish feminization effects in European remote sites. Sci Rep 5:11292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Quirós L, Jarque S, Lackner R, Fernández P, Grimalt JO, Piña B (2007) Physiological response to persistent organic pollutants in fish from mountain lakes: analysis of CYP1A gene expression in natural populations of Salmo trutta. Environ Sci Technol 41(14):5154–5160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Sparling DW, Bickham J, Cowman D et al (2015) In situ effects of pesticides on amphibians in the Sierra Nevada. Ecotoxicology 24:262–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Davidson C (2004) Declining downwind: amphibian population declines in california and historical pesticide use. Ecol Appl 14:1892–1902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Davidson C, Knapp RA (2007) Multiple stressors and amphibian declines: dual impacts of pesticides and fish on yellow-legged frogs. Ecol Appl 17(2):587–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Fellers GM, McConnell LL, Pratt D, Datta S (2004) Pesticides in mountain yellow-legged frogs (Rana muscosa) from the Sierra Nevada mountains of California, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 23(9):2170–2177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Sparling D, Fellers G (2001) Pesticides are involved with population declines of amphibians in the California Sierra Nevadas. Sci World J 1:200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Sparling DW, Fellers GM (2009) Toxicity of two insecticides to California, USA, anurans and its relevance to declining amphibian populations. Environ Toxicol Chem 28(8):1696–1703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Vredenburg VT, McNally SVG, Sulaeman H, Butler HM, Yap T, Koo MS et al (2019) Pathogen invasion history elucidates contemporary host pathogen dynamics. PLoS ONE 14:e0219981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Kerby JL, Hart AJ, Storfer A (2011) Combined effects of virus, pesticide, and predator cue on the larval tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum). EcoHealth 8:46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. King KC, Daniel Mclaughlin J, Boily M, Marcogliese DJ (2010) Effects of agricultural landscape and pesticides on parasitism in native bullfrogs. Biol Cons 143:302–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Hodges E, Tomcej V (2016) Is there a link between pollutant exposure and emerging infectious disease? Can Vet J 57(5):535–537

    Google Scholar 

  92. Beketov MA, Speranza A, Liess M (2011) Ultraviolet radiation increases sensitivity to pesticides: synergistic effects on population growth rate of Daphnia magna at low concentrations. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 87:231–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. González-Ortegón E, Giménez L, Blasco J, Le Vay L (2015) Effects of food limitation and pharmaceutical compounds on the larval development and morphology of Palaemon serratus. Sci Total Environ 503–504:171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Liess M, Champeau O, Riddle M, Schulz R, Duquesne S (2001) Combined effects of ultraviolet-B radiation and food shortage on the sensitivity of the Antarctic amphipod Paramoera walkeri to copper. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:2088–2092

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Liess M, Foit K, Knillmann S, Schäfer RB, Liess H-D (2016) Predicting the synergy of multiple stress effects. Sci Rep 6:32965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Ankley GT, Collyard SA, Monson PD, Kosian PA (1994) Influence of ultraviolet light on the toxicity of sediments contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ Toxicol Chem 13:1791–1796

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Marwood C, Smith R, Charlton M, Solomon K, Greenberg B (2003) Photoinduced toxicity to lake erie phytoplankton assemblages from intact and photomodified polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. J Great Lakes Res 29:558–565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Blais JM, Wilhelm F, Kidd KA, Muir DCG, Donald DB, Schindler DW (2003) Concentrations of organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in amphipods (Gammarus lacustris) along an elevation gradient in mountain lakes of western Canada. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:2605–2613

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Muir D, Braune B, DeMarch B, Norstrom R, Wagemann R, Lockhart L et al (1999) Spatial and temporal trends and effects of contaminants in the Canadian Arctic marine ecosystem: a review. Sci Total Environ 230:83–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Van den Berg SJP, Baveco H, Butler E, De Laender F, Focks A, Franco A et al (2019) Modeling the sensitivity of aquatic macroinvertebrates to chemicals using traits. Environ Sci Technol 53:6025–6034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Berglund O, Larsson P, Ewald G, Okla L (2001) Influence of trophic status on PCB distribution in lake sediments and biota. Environ Pollut 113:199–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Larsson P, Okla L, Cronberg G (2011) Turnover of polychlorinated biphenyls in an oligotrophic and a eutrophic lake in relation to internal lake processes and atmospheric fallout. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:1926–1937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Morrissey CA, Bendell-Young LI, Elliott JE (2005) Identifying sources and biomagnification of persistent organic contaminants in biota from mountain streams of southwestern British Columbia, Canada. Environ Sci Technol 39:8090–8098

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Campbell L, Schindler D, Muir D, Donald D, Kidd K (2011) Organochlorine transfer in the food web of subalpine Bow lake, Banff national park. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:1258–1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Vives I, Grimalt JO, Ventura M, Catalan J (2005) Distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the food web of a high mountain lake, Pyrenees, Catalonia. Spain Environ Toxicol Chem 24(6):1344–1352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Brock TC, Arts GH, Maltby L, Van den Brink PJ (2006) Aquatic risks of pesticides, ecological protection goals, and common aims in european union legislation. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2:e20–e46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Murphy E, Cavanagh RD, Drinkwater K, Grant S, Heymans J, Hofmann E Jr, Johnston NM (2016) Understanding the structure and functioning of polar pelagic ecosystems to predict the impacts of change. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci 283:20161646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Vergeynst L, Wegeberg S, Aamand J, Lassen P, Gosewinkel U, Fritt-Rasmussen J, Gustavson K, Mosbech A (2018) Biodegradation of marine oil spills in the Arctic with a Greenland perspective. Sci Total Environ 626:1243–1258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Getoff N (2002) Factors influencing the efficiency of radiation-induced degradation of water pollutants. Radiat Phys Chem 65:437–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Brack W, Hollender J, de Alda ML, Müller C, Schulze T, Schymanski E et al (2019) High-resolution mass spectrometry to complement monitoring and track emerging chemicals and pollution trends in European water resources. Environ Sci Eur 31:62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Hollender J, Schymanski EL, Singer HP, Ferguson PL (2017) Nontarget screening with high resolution mass spectrometry in the environment: ready to go? Environ Sci Technol 51:11505–11512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Altenburger R, Brack W, Burgess RM, Busch W, Escher BI, Focks A et al (2019) Future water quality monitoring: improving the balance between exposure and toxicity assessments of real-world pollutant mixtures. Environ Sci Eur. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-019-0193-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Brack W, Aissa SA, Backhaus T, Dulio V, Escher BI, Faust M et al (2019) Effect-based methods are key the European collaborative Project solutions recommends integrating effect-based methods for diagnosis and monitoring of water quality. Environ Sci Eur. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-019-0192-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Lohmann R, Muir D (2010) Global aquatic passive sampling (AQUA-GAPS): using passive samplers to monitor POPs in the waters of the world. Environ Sci Technol 44:860–864

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Lohmann R, Muir D, Zeng EY, Bao L-J, Allan IJ, Arinaitwe K et al (2017) Aquatic global passive sampling (AQUA-GAPS) revisited: first steps toward a network of networks for monitoring organic contaminants in the aquatic environment. Environ Sci Technol 51:1060–1067

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Vrana B, Klučárová V, Benická E, Abou-Mrad N, Amdany R, Horáková S et al (2014) Passive sampling: an effective method for monitoring seasonal and spatial variability of dissolved hydrophobic organic contaminants and metals in the Danube river. Environ Pollut 184:101–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Wolfram J, Stehle S, Bub S, Petschick LL, Schulz R (2021) Water quality and ecological risks in European surface waters – Monitoring improves while water quality decreases. Environ Int 152:106479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Gong P, Wang X, Pokhrel B, Wang H, Liu X, Liu X, Wania F (2019) Trans-himalayan transport of organochlorine compounds: three-year observations and model-based flux estimation. Environ Sci Technol 53:6773–6783

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Schmeller DS, Payne D, Bates K, Catalan J, Dan C et al (2022) Scientists’ warning of threats to mountains. Sci Total Environ 853:158611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Shahid N, Liess M, Knillmann S (2019) Environmental stress increases synergistic effects of pesticide mixtures on Daphnia magna. Environ Sci Technol 53:12586–12593

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Shahid N, Rolle-Kampczyk U, Siddique A, von Bergen M, Liess M (2021) Pesticide-induced metabolic changes are amplified by food stress. Sci Total Environ 792:148350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. Haver M, Le Roux G, Friesen J, Loyau A, Vredenburg VT, Schmeller DS (2022) The role of abiotic variables in an emerging global amphibian fungal disease in mountains. Sci Total Environ 815:152735

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. Rohr JR, Schotthoefer AM, Raffel TR, Carrick HJ, Halstead N, Hoverman JT et al (2008) Agrochemicals increase trematode infections in a declining amphibian species. Nature 455:1235-U50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Vijayaraj V, Kipferler N, Stibor H, Allen J, Holker F, Laviale M et al (2022) Evaluating multiple stressor effects on benthic-pelagic freshwater communities in systems of different complexities: challenges in upscaling. Water 14:581

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. Hollert H, Crawford SE, Brack W, Brinkmann M, Fischer E, Hartmann K et al (2018) Looking back—looking forward: a novel multi-time slice weight-of-evidence approach for defining reference conditions to assess the impact of human activities on lake systems. Sci Total Environ 626:1036–1046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Korosi JB, Thienpont JR, Smol JP, Blais JM (2017) Paleo-ecotoxicology: what can lake sediments tell us about ecosystem responses to environmental pollutants? Environ Sci Technol 51:9446–9457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the authors we contacted throughout the process of creating this manuscript. Without them giving us additional insights into their publications and sharing the data their publications have been based on, the insights this review could have provided would have been very limited.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. DSS holds the AXA Chair for Functional Mountain Ecology funded by the AXA Research Fund through the project GloMEc. This study was conducted in the framework of the project People, Pollution, and Pathogens (P3), which was financed through the call 'Mountains as Sentinels of Change' by the Belmont-Forum (ANR-15-MASC-0001-P3, DFG-SCHM 3059/6–1, NERC-1633948, NSFC-41661144004, NSF-1633948). OM received funding through the graduate school ESCALATE.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Effect Directed Analysis, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, Permoserstrasse 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany

    Oliver Machate, Tobias Schulze & Werner Brack

  2. Department of Biology, University of Leipzig, Johannisallee 21-23, 04103, Leipzig, Germany

    Oliver Machate

  3. Laboratoire Écologie Fonctionnelle Et Environnement, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse INP, Université Toulouse 3—Paul Sabatier (UPS), Toulouse, France

    Dirk S. Schmeller

  4. Department of Evolutionary Ecology and Environmental Toxicology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Max-Von-Laue-Strasse. 13, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    Werner Brack

Authors
  1. Oliver Machate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dirk S. Schmeller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tobias Schulze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Werner Brack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

OM gathered the data and information presented here, performed the toxicity risk assessment and drafted the manuscript. DSS initiated the manuscript and provided guidance on the ecology and vulnerability of mountain lakes ecosystems. TS provided the toxicity data and guidance on their application. WB supervised the work on this manuscript, helped to structure its content and contributed text passages to the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Werner Brack.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No reporting on any animal or human data or tissue is included within this manuscript. Following no approval or consent is required.

Consent for publication

All data that have been presented throughout the manuscript or are attached within the additional file have either been publicly available or if not, the originator of the data has agreed to it being used in this manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1:

Comparison of freely dissolved equilibrium water concentrations, predicted based on sediment concentrations, towards water concentrations measured in other monitoring studies of mountain lakes. Table S1: Sediment core data for mountain lakes from different mountain ranges of the world containing concentration information on sums of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (∑PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (∑PCBs) and DDTs (∑DDTs). Where certain compounds were not measured, they are marked as not assessed (NA). Table S2: Reference values for mountain lake sediment cores derived from Van Metre et al (2004) in ng/g d.w. derived by investigating 38 U.S. lakes and reservoirs. Values displayed are means of values stated for the respective lakes and reservoirs. Urban = In densely populated region; Light Urban = In less densely populated regions; Remote = In scarcely populated regions.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Machate, O., Schmeller, D.S., Schulze, T. et al. Review: mountain lakes as freshwater resources at risk from chemical pollution. Environ Sci Eur 35, 3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00710-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00710-3

Keywords

  • Organic micropollutants
  • Organic chemicals
  • Mountain lakes
  • Risk assessment
  • Zooplankton
  • Biodiversity