Transcriptome and metabolome analysis of liver and kidneys of rats chronically fed NK603 Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize
© The Author(s) 2017
Received: 22 September 2016
Accepted: 27 January 2017
Published: 7 February 2017
A previous 2-year rat feeding trial assessing potential toxicity of NK603 Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize revealed blood and urine biochemical changes indicative of liver and kidney pathology. In an effort to obtain deeper insight into these findings, molecular profiling of the liver and kidneys from the same animals was undertaken.
Transcriptomics showed no segregation of NK603 maize and control feed groups with false discovery rates ranging from 43 to 83% at a cut-off p value of 1%. Changes in gene expression were not reflective of liver and kidney toxic effects. Metabolomics identified 692 and 673 metabolites in kidney and liver, respectively. None of the statistically significant disturbances detected (12–56 for different test groups) survived a false discovery rate analysis. Differences in these metabolites between individual animals within a group were greater than the effect of test diets, which prevents a definitive conclusion on either pathology or safety.
Even if the biological relevance of the statistical differences presented in this study is unclear, our results are made available for scrutiny by the scientific community and for comparison in future studies investigating potential toxicological properties of the NK603 corn.
KeywordsRoundup Glyphosate GMO Transcriptome Metabolome Toxicity
The application of genetic modification (recombinant DNA, transgenic) technologies in agricultural practice has been advocated as an important advance in recent decades . As they are made to meet the food needs of the entire human and most farm animal populations, the safety of plant products derived from this type of biotechnology is an important consideration and has been a matter of great debate. While advocates put forward evidences, which they suggest prove their safety [2, 3], others provide evidence-based arguments that show a lack of a scientific consensus on the safety of genetically modified (GM) foodstuffs .
Part of the concern raised by these GM crops rests on the fact that to date the vast majority are engineered to either tolerate application of a herbicide or produce a new systemic insecticide or both, which can result in elevated levels of these substances in food and feed . In 2014, insecticide production and herbicide tolerance traits were deployed singly or in combination (“stacked”) in all agricultural GM commodity crops namely maize, soybeans, cotton and canola . These GM crops were collectively planted globally on 181 million hectares in 28 countries, which represents approximately 8% of total global cropland, although cultivation was concentrated (>90%) in just 6 nations .
Approximately, 80% of all GM crops have been designed to tolerate application of glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs), with Roundup being the major commercial brand. GBHs were first sold in 1974 and since then their use has increased 100-fold, with the vast majority (two-thirds) of the use having taken place in the last 10 years; that is, since the introduction of GBH-tolerant GM crops . As a result, GBH-tolerant GM crops accumulate residues of these herbicides during cultivation  potentially increasing the daily intake of the consumer. In addition, the quantity of GM crop ingredients in laboratory rodent feed correlates with their content in GBH residues . The safety of GBH residue consumption is highly controversial as some studies have demonstrated toxic effects in laboratory animals [9, 10], farm animals , as well as possible carcinogenic effects in humans . This has led some commentators to suggest that there exists a gap between criteria used by regulators for market approval of GBHs and the advancing scientific evidence base questioning the safety of this class of herbicide .
Other concerns regarding sources of potential GM food toxicity stem from the molecular biological outcomes of the transformation process. In addition to bringing about a novel combination of gene functions, the GM transformation process as used to generate currently commercialized crops results in random transgene insertion with a risk of insertional mutagenesis. Furthermore, the plant tissue culture phase employed in the vast majority of GM transformation procedures is known to bring about large numbers of random genome-wide mutations and even chromosomal rearrangements, a phenomenon known as “somaclonal variation” [14–16]. As a result, the GM transformation process as a whole may inadvertently activate, inactivate, under- or overexpress one or more host genes. For example, in Roundup-tolerant GM soybeans, it has been found that read-through transcripts into sequences present downstream of the transgene integration site resulted in four different RNA variants, which might code for unknown fusion proteins . It is therefore perhaps not surprising to find that studies using molecular profiling (proteomic, metabolomic) techniques have found significant compositional differences between the GM line and non-GM isogenic parent. These methods have shown marked protein and metabolite profile differences induced by the GM transformation process in numerous crops such as maize [18–20], potatoes , rice [22, 23] and cotton . These types of protein and metabolic changes can not only modify crop performance [25, 26] but could also change the nutritional and toxicological profile of the transgenic plant .
In order to evaluate the safety of GM food consumption, including for the purposes of obtaining market approval, several studies consisting of 90-day feeding trials in rats have been conducted, which analysed groups of 10 animals. These investigations have frequently resulted in statistically significant differences in parameters reflective of liver and kidney biochemistry, but with interpretation of their biological significance being a point of contention . Of particular relevance to the study we present here, analysis of blood and urine of rats fed a diet supplemented with Roundup-tolerant NK603 GM corn for 90 days showed statistically significant differences in multiple components , which has been suggested may constitute early signs of liver and kidney toxicity . In a follow-up chronic toxicity, investigation rats were fed the same NK603 GM corn for a 2-year period in order to determine if the statistically significant differences in urine and blood biochemistry, which could be interpreted as signs of liver and kidney dysfunction, did indeed escalate into serious disease. The results obtained included blood/urine biochemical changes indicative of liver and kidney structure and functional pathology .
In an effort to obtain deeper insight into these findings that could be taken as signs of kidney and liver pathology, we conducted a full transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis of these organs from the female cohort of animals fed a diet supplemented with 33% NK603 GM corn either with or without Roundup application during cultivation. Overall, although statistically significant differences in several metabolites that were indicative of organ damage were observed in the metabolomics analysis between test and control animals fed the non-GM isogenic equivalent corn, high false discovery rates prevented definitive conclusions of harm or safety. In addition, differences observed between individuals within a given group were greater than the metabolic effect of the different diets. Even if the biological relevance of the statistically significant differences presented in this study is unclear, we make our results available for comparison in future studies investigating the potential toxicological properties of the NK603 corn.
The tissues analysed in this study were obtained from animals as previously described . Briefly, the experimental protocol is as follows. The varieties of maize used in this study were DKC 2678 Roundup-tolerant NK603 (Monsanto Corp., USA) and its nearest isogenic non-transgenic control DKC 2675. Harlan Sprague–Dawley rats at 5 weeks of age were randomly assigned on a weight basis into groups of 10 animals. For each sex, one control group had access to plain water and standard diet from the closest isogenic non-transgenic maize control; six groups were fed with 11, 22 and 33% of GM NK603 maize either treated or not with Roundup at 3 L/ha (WeatherMAX, 540 g/L of glyphosate, EPA Reg. 524–537). Clinical and biochemical parameters measured have been extensively described . Animals were sacrificed at the same time of day during the course of the study either to comply with animal welfare regulations to avoid unnecessary suffering or at the termination of the study period of 2 years. Liver and kidneys were divided in two and one half snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen/dry ice and stored at −80 °C.
Transverse cross-sectional slices of liver and kidneys were processed for total RNA extraction using MagMax-96 for Microarrays Total RNA Isolation Kit (Ambion, Life Technologies Ltd, Paisley, UK). Total RNA (500 ng) was labelled using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) in the presence of a proprietary biotinylated compound using the Ambion whole transcript Expression kit and the whole transcript Terminal Labelling kit (Affymetrix UK Ltd., High Wycombe, UK), following the standard protocols. We employed the Affymetrix GeneChip® Rat Gene 2.0 ST Array containing approximately 610,400 probes grouped into 214,300 exon-level and 26,400 gene-level probe sets. Hybridization cocktails were applied to Affymetrix Rat Gene 2.0 microarrays and processed in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommended procedure using the GCS3000 microarray system (Affymetrix). Array data were exported as cell intensity (CEL) files for further analysis. CEL files were normalized together in the Expression Console software package (Affymetrix), using the Robust Multi-array Average (RMA) sketch algorithm (gene-level). Data were quality control assessed by using standard metrics and guidelines for the Affymetrix microarray system. Normalized data files (CHP files) were imported into Omics Explorer 3.0 (Qlucore) for further quality control and statistical analysis. Data used for the functional analysis were selected at the statistical cut-off values of p < 0.01 with FC >1.1 . The pathway analysis was done using the Thomson Reuters MetaCore Analytical Suite and/or the NIH Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery Bioinformatics Resources 6.7 (DAVID) using recommended analytical parameters . These microarray data have been submitted to Gene Omnibus and are accessible through accession number GSE73888.
Semi-quantitative metabolomics analysis was performed by ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy (UPLC-MS/MS) and gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC–MS) at Metabolon Inc. (Durham, NC, USA) as previously described [33, 34]. Briefly, samples prepared using Metabolon’s standard extraction were divided into five fractions: one for analysis by UPLC-MS/MS with positive ion mode electrospray ionization, one for analysis by UPLC-MS/MS with negative ion mode electrospray ionization, one for LC polar platform, one for analysis by GC–MS, and one sample was reserved for backup. A quality control value assessment was undertaken to determine instrument variability by calculating the median relative standard deviation (RSD) for the internal standards that were pre-mixed into each sample prior to injection into the mass spectrometer. This yielded a value of 6% for instrument variability. Overall process variability as determined by calculating the median RSD for all endogenous metabolites (that is, non-instrument standards) present in 100% of the samples gave a value of 11–12%.
Raw data were extracted, peak-identified and QC processed using Metabolon’s hardware and software . Metabolites were identified by automated comparison and curated by visual inspection for quality control using software developed at Metabolon . Peaks were quantified using area under the curve. The maximum percent missing data allowed was 20%. As a result, 647 and 593 metabolites were taken forward for bioanalytical analysis in kidney and liver tissues, respectively. The language and statistical environment R was employed in order to explore the relationship between the control and the treated samples. We regressed out the batch effects to correct variation resulting from instrument inter-day tuning differences using the limma package removeBatchEffect . Pairwise non-parametric Mann–Whitney U tests were performed and a p value was attributed to each of the metabolites. The resulting p values were adjusted by the Benjamini–Hochberg multi-test adjustment method for a high number of comparisons. Volcano plots were also constructed in order to visualize the differences in metabolite and protein expression for each of the comparisons. The aforementioned tests and plots were performed using in-house R scripts.
Rat liver and kidney tissues were obtained from animals that formed part of a chronic (2-year) feeding study looking at potential toxic effects arising from the consumption of the Roundup-tolerant GM maize NK603. The three groups of animals that formed the focus of this investigated were fed standard laboratory rat chow diets supplemented with 33% NK603 GM maize (NK603-R), 33% NK603 GM maize plus Roundup application during cultivation (NK603+R) and a control diet with 33% non-GM isogenic maize. Most male rats were discovered after death had occurred. This resulted in organ necrosis making them unsuitable for further analysis. We therefore focused our investigation on female animals where freshly dissected tissues from cohorts of 9–10 euthanized treated and untreated rats were available. Female controls were euthanized at 701 ± 62 days. Rats fed NK603-R and NK603+R were, respectively, euthanized at 618 ± 148 and 677 ± 83 days. Female animals mostly died from mammary tumours (8 on 5 controls rats, 15 on 8 NK603-R rats, and 13 on 9 NK603+R rats). The objective of this investigation was to obtain deeper insight into the biology of the liver and kidneys from this cohort of female animals by a molecular profiling (transcriptomics, metabolomics) analytical approach.
Number of transcript clusters whose expression is disturbed at different cut-off threshold p values
Although transcriptome analyses reveal alterations in gene function that could be correlated with toxicological processes, they do not always translate into metabolic disturbances. Thus, in order to obtain insight into organ damage, we next conducted a metabolome profiling of liver and kidney sections of GM NK603 (±Roundup) corn treatment groups from the same animals to ascertain any changes in metabolites that could be indicative of disease. In this study, 692 and 673 metabolites were, respectively, identified in kidney and liver tissues. In order to ascertain if Roundup residues were bioaccumulating, we also measured the presence of glyphosate (N-(phosphonomethyl) glycine) and its metabolite aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA). At a limit of detection of 7.8 ppb, neither glyphosate nor AMPA was found to be present in these tissues.
We report here the first in vivo transcriptomics and metabolomics analysis in an established rat toxicity model system following long-term (2 year) consumption of an agricultural GM food, namely NK603 Roundup-tolerant maize.
The metabolite 3-methylhistidine, which was found elevated in the kidney tissue of animals fed NK603 (Fig. 5), is an indicator of protein catabolism. The dipeptide 3-methylhistidine is formed by the posttranslational methylation of histidine in the contractile proteins of skeletal muscle, actin and myosin. Proteolytic degradation of muscle tissues generates free 3-methylhistidine, which is slowly released into the bloodstream, where it is efficiently filtered by the kidney. The measurement of 3-methylhistidine provides an index of the rate of muscle protein breakdown . In a previous investigation of the kidney metabolome, one of the most significant effects induced by three nephrotoxins was a decrease in dipeptides . In liver, we observed an accumulation of polyamines (putrescine and spermidine), which could suggest an elevated metabolic state (Fig. 5). Typically, polyamines are highly active in rapidly proliferating cells, although their levels fluctuate during the cell cycle and accumulate in regenerating liver . The increased levels of polyamines in liver could also be explained by an increased dietary intake since the NK603 maize tested here has been found to contain more polyamines than its near-isogenic counterpart . However, the biological relevance of the metabolic alterations observed in this study remains to be ascertained.
Residues of the GBH were neither detected in liver and kidneys of animals fed NK603 maize sprayed with Roundup during cultivation at a level of detection of 7.8 ppb, nor in the grain itself (level of quantification 10 ppb) (Mesnage and Antoniou, unpublished results). This in all likelihood is due to the fact that Roundup was applied early during the cultivation cycle. This also provides an explanation as to why we observed no difference in either the transcriptome or metabolome profiles between the two test and the control groups. The presence of GBH residues in the feed would have been expected to show statistically significant differences in these molecular profiling parameters since consumption of an ultra-low dose of Roundup (4 ng/kg body weight/day glyphosate equivalent exposure) administered via drinking water showed marked, highly significant differences in the transcriptome of both liver and kidneys of rats, which was reflective of structure and functional damage in these organs . More recently, we have shown that proteome and metabolome profiles from the same cohort of female animals reveal the presence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease . It should be noted that a single application of GBH during cultivation of glyphosate-tolerant GM crops as conducted in the generation of the NK603 maize grain used in this study is not a typical farming practice. Generally, at least two applications of GBH are employed, early and late during the cultivation cycle, resulting in residues of glyphosate and AMPA being readily detectable in the harvested crop .
In conclusion, the analyses presented here for liver and kidneys from rats fed a diet containing 33% NK603 GM maize were not sufficient to definitively conclude on the molecular effects underlying the pathologies previously reported in these organs . Therefore, it is not possible to arrive at conclusion of either harm or safety from the consumption of this GM maize. Although our results are largely negative with respect to differences between test and control groups, they are nevertheless informative and thus we make them available for comparison in future studies investigating the toxicological properties of the NK603 corn.
RM performed the statistical analysis, interpreted the transcriptome data, and drafted the manuscript. MA conducted the transcriptome experiment and assisted with data interpretation. CM performed the statistical analysis of the metabolome data. GES conceived the animal feeding trial and provided tissues for analysis. MNA and GES conceived the study. MNA coordinated the investigation and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This work was funded by the Sustainable Food Alliance (USA), whose support is gratefully acknowledged.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Availability of data and materials
The raw data from this investigation have been posted online and can be freely accessed for independent reanalysis and used for comparison in future studies. Microarray data have been submitted to Gene Omnibus and are accessible through accession number GSE73888. Metabolome data are posted online as Additional file.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The animal experimental protocol was conducted in accordance with the regulations of the local ethics committee in an animal care unit authorized by the French Ministries of Agriculture and Research (Agreement Number A35-288-1). Animal experiments were performed according to ethical guidelines of animal experimentation (regulation CEE 86/609).
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Van Montagu M (2011) It is a long way to GM agriculture. Annu Rev Plant Biol 62:1–23View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nicolia A, Manzo A, Veronesi F, Rosellini D (2014) An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research. Crit Rev Biotechnol 34(1):77–88View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Van Eenennaam AL, Young AE (2014) Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations. J Anim Sci 92(10):4255–4278View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hilbeck A, Binimelis R, Defarge N, Steinbrecher R, Székács A, Wickson F, Antoniou M, Bereano PL, Clark EA, Hansen M, Novotny E, Heinemann J, Meyer H, Shiva V, Wynne B (2015) No scientific consensus on GMO safety. Environ Sci Eur 27(1):4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- James C (2015) Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2015. ISAAA Brief 51Google Scholar
- Benbrook CM (2016) Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally. Environ Sci Eur 28(1):3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bohn T, Cuhra M, Traavik T, Sanden M, Fagan J, Primicerio R (2014) Compositional differences in soybeans on the market: glyphosate accumulates in Roundup Ready GM soybeans. Food Chem 153:207–215View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mesnage R, Defarge N, Rocque LM, Spiroux de Vendomois J, Seralini GE (2015) Laboratory rodent diets contain toxic levels of environmental contaminants: implications for regulatory tests. PLoS ONE 10(7):e0128429View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mesnage R, Defarge N, Spiroux de Vendomois J, Seralini GE (2015) Potential toxic effects of glyphosate and its commercial formulations below regulatory limits. Food Chem Toxicol 84:133–153View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Antoniou M, Habib MEM, Howard CV, Jennings RC, Leifert C, Nodari RO (2012) Teratogenic effects of glyphosate-based herbicides: divergence of regulatory decisions from scientific evidence. J Environ Anal Toxicol S4:006Google Scholar
- Krüger M, Schrödl W, Neuhaus J, Shehata A (2013) Field investigations of glyphosate in urine of Danish dairy cows. J Environ Anal Toxicol 3:5Google Scholar
- Guyton KZ, Loomis D, Grosse Y, El Ghissassi F, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Guha N, Scoccianti C, Mattock H, Straif K (2015) Carcinogenicity of tetrachlorvinphos, parathion, malathion, diazinon, and glyphosate. Lancet Oncol 16(5):490–491View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Myers JP, Antoniou MN, Blumberg B, Carroll L, Colborn T, Everett LG, Hansen M, Landrigan PJ, Lanphear BP, Mesnage R, Vandenberg LN, vom Saal FS, Welshons WV, Benbrook CM (2016) Concerns over use of glyphosate-based herbicides and risks associated with exposures: a consensus statement. Environ Health 15(1):19View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fonseca C, Planchon S, Serra T, Chander S, Saibo NJ, Renaut J, Oliveira MM, Batista R (2015) In vitro culture may be the major contributing factor for transgenic versus nontransgenic proteomic plant differences. Proteomics 15(1):124–134View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Latham JR, Wilson AK, Steinbrecher RA (2006) The mutational consequences of plant transformation. J Biomed Biotechnol 2006:25376View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wilson AK, Latham JR, Steinbrecher RA (2006) Transformation-induced mutations in transgenic plants: analysis and biosafety implications. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 23:209–237View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rang A, Linke B, Jansen B (2005) Detection of RNA variants transcribed from the transgene in Roundup Ready soybean. Eur Food Res Technol 220(3):438–443View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Herrero M, Ibanez E, Martin-Alvarez PJ, Cifuentes A (2007) Analysis of chiral amino acids in conventional and transgenic maize. Anal Chem 79(13):5071–5077View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Manetti C, Bianchetti C, Casciani L, Castro C, Di Cocco ME, Miccheli A, Motto M, Conti F (2006) A metabonomic study of transgenic maize (Zea mays) seeds revealed variations in osmolytes and branched amino acids. J Exp Bot 57(11):2613–2625View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zolla L, Rinalducci S, Antonioli P, Righetti PG (2008) Proteomics as a complementary tool for identifying unintended side effects occurring in transgenic maize seeds as a result of genetic modifications. J Proteome Res 7(5):1850–1861View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shepherd LV, Hackett CA, Alexander CJ, McNicol JW, Sungurtas JA, Stewart D, McCue KF, Belknap WR, Davies HV (2015) Modifying glycoalkaloid content in transgenic potato—metabolome impacts. Food Chem 187:437–443View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jiao Z, Si XX, Li GK, Zhang ZM, Xu XP (2010) Unintended compositional changes in transgenic rice seeds (Oryza sativa L.) studied by spectral and chromatographic analysis coupled with chemometrics methods. J Agric Food Chem 58(3):1746–1754View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou J, Ma C, Xu H, Yuan K, Lu X, Zhu Z, Wu Y, Xu G (2009) Metabolic profiling of transgenic rice with cryIAc and sck genes: an evaluation of unintended effects at metabolic level by using GC-FID and GC-MS. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 877(8–9):725–732View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li X, Ding C, Wang X, Liu B (2015) Comparison of the physiological characteristics of transgenic insect-resistant cotton and conventional lines. Scientific Rep 5:8739View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Agapito-Tenfen SZ, Vilperte V, Benevenuto RF, Rover CM, Traavik TI, Nodari RO (2014) Effect of stacking insecticidal cry and herbicide tolerance epsps transgenes on transgenic maize proteome. BMC Plant Biol 14:346View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Agapito-Tenfen SZ, Guerra MP, Wikmark OG, Nodari RO (2013) Comparative proteomic analysis of genetically modified maize grown under different agroecosystems conditions in Brazil. Proteome Sci 11(1):46View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dona A, Arvanitoyannis IS (2009) Health risks of genetically modified foods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 49(2):164–175View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Spiroux de Vendômois J, Cellier D, Velot C, Clair E, Mesnage R, Seralini GE (2010) Debate on GMOs health risks after statistical findings in regulatory tests. Int J Biol Sci 6(6):590–598View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hammond B, Dudek R, Lemen J, Nemeth M (2004) Results of a 13 week safety assurance study with rats fed grain from glyphosate tolerant corn. Food Chem Toxicol 42(6):1003–1021View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Spiroux de Vendômois J, Roullier F, Cellier D, Seralini GE (2009) A comparison of the effects of three GM corn varieties on mammalian health. Int J Biol Sci 5(7):706–726View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Seralini GE, Clair E, Mesnage R, Gress S, Defarge N, Malatesta M (2014) Republished study: long-term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize. Environ Sci Eur 26:14View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2009) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4(1):44–57View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Evans AMBB, Liu Q, Mitchell MW, Robinson RJ et al (2014) High resolution mass spectrometry improves data quantity and quality as compared to unit mass resolution mass spectrometry in high-throughput profiling metabolomics. Metabolomics 4:132Google Scholar
- Ohta T, Masutomi N, Tsutsui N, Sakairi T, Mitchell M, Milburn MV, Ryals JA, Beebe KD, Guo L (2009) Untargeted metabolomic profiling as an evaluative tool of fenofibrate-induced toxicology in Fischer 344 male rats. Toxicol Pathol 37(4):521–535View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dehaven Cd EA DH, Lawton Ka (2012) Software techniques for enabling high-throughput analysis of metabolomic datasets. In: Roessner U (ed) Metabolomics. InTech. ISBN:978-953-51-0046-1. doi:10.5772/31277. http://www.intechopen.com/books/metabolomics/software-techniques-for-enabling-high-throughput-analysis-on-metabolomic-datasets
- Dehaven CD, Evans AM, Dai H, Lawton KA (2010) Organization of GC/MS and LC/MS metabolomics data into chemical libraries. J Cheminf 2(1):9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, Smyth GK (2015) limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res 43(7):e47View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mesnage R, Arno M, Costanzo M, Malatesta M, Séralini G-E, Antoniou MN (2015) Transcriptome profile analysis reflects rat liver and kidney damage following chronic ultra-low dose Roundup exposure. Environ Health 14(1):70View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aranibar N, Vassallo JD, Rathmacher J, Stryker S, Zhang Y, Dai J, Janovitz EB, Robertson D, Reily M, Lowe-Krentz L, Lehman-McKeeman L (2011) Identification of 1- and 3-methylhistidine as biomarkers of skeletal muscle toxicity by nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolic profiling. Anal Biochem 410(1):84–91View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boudonck KJ, Mitchell MW, Nemet L, Keresztes L, Nyska A, Shinar D, Rosenstock M (2009) Discovery of metabolomics biomarkers for early detection of nephrotoxicity. Toxicol Pathol 37(3):280–292View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ogiso S, Matsumoto T, Nimura Y (1997) The role of polyamines in liver regeneration after hepatectomy with ischemic injury. Surg Today 27(9):833–839View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mesnage R, Agapito-Tenfen S, Vilperte V, Renney G, Ward M, Séralini GE, Antoniou M (2016) An integrated multi-omics analysis of the NK603 Roundup-tolerant GM maize reveals metabolism disturbances caused by the transformation process. Sci Rep 6:37855View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mesnage R, Renney G, Séralini GE, Ward M, Antoniou M (2017) Multiomics reveal non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in rats following chronic exposure to an ultra-low dose of Roundup herbicide. Sci Rep 7:39328View ArticleGoogle Scholar