Skip to main content
Environmental Sciences Europe
Download PDF

Risk and economic cost of hospitalization due to atrial fibrillation caused by air pollution: a multi-city time series analysis

Environmental Sciences Europe volume 35, Article number: 4 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia, resulting in serious cardiovascular diseases. Air pollution may cause heart rate disturbance, but there is no clear or consistent evidence that short-term exposure to air pollution leads to an increased risk of hospitalisation for symptomatic episodes of AF. This study aimed to assess the impact of short-term exposure to air pollution on inpatient numbers.

Methods

The inpatient records of AF cases in nine cities of the Sichuan Province, China and air pollution and meteorological data from 183 monitoring stations from 2017 to 2018 were collected. The impact of short-term exposure to air pollution on AF inpatients was evaluated using a time-stratified crossover case study design. The economic burden of AF attributable to air pollution was also estimated.

Results

A total of 5,958 patients with AF from 123 medical institutions were included in the analysis. Air pollutants had a significant impact on the number of patients with AF. The number increased by 2.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.006 to 1.044) and 1.8% (95% CI = 1.003–1.033) for every 10 µg/m3 increase in PM2.5, PM10, concentration, respectively. Moreover, the number increased by 12.7% (95% CI = 1.006 to 1.262) for every 10 µg/m3 increase of SO2 concentration. For every 0.1 μg/m3 increase in CO concentration, the number of inpatients with AF increased by 3.9% (95% CI = 1.010–1.070). People aged 65 years or older and women were more likely to be affected by air pollutants. The AF in 430 and 209 inpatients were attributable to PM2.5 and PM10, respectively. The total hospitalization expenses attributed to excessive exposure to PM2.5 and PM10 were 13.98 million CNY and 6.68 million CNY, respectively. Furthermore, the out-of-pocket expenses were 6.81 million CNY and 3.28 million CNY, respectively.

Conclusions

This study showed a strong correlation between air pollution and AF. Hence, there is a need to reduce air pollution to control health risks.

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and has a complex etiology. AF can lead to increased morbidity and mortality due to stroke, heart failure, and other heart diseases [1, 2]. It is estimated that 2–4% of adults worldwide are affected by AF [3]. The prevalence of AF in Europe and the USA is approximately 1–4%, while the prevalence in Asia is significantly lower (0.5–1.9%) [4]. Although the burden of AF is smaller in low- and middle-income countries compared to developed countries, this gap is gradually narrowing [5]. China, as a developing country, is also trending toward a developed country in terms of AF prevalence. According to a national survey from 2017 to 2021, the total prevalence of AF in Chinese adults was 1.60% [6], which increased by 0.56% compared with the results of Wang et al. in 2015–2017 [7]. AF is an important risk factor for Cerebral Ischemic Stroke (CIS). The risk of CIS in patients with AF is 5–6 times higher than that in the general population [8]. China has one of the highest disease burdens related to stroke in the world. In 2018, 3.01 million patients were admitted to 1,853 large hospitals for stroke. Of these, 2.47 million (81.9%) were patients with CIS [9]. This disease burden cannot be ignored.

The etiology of AF is diverse. In general, the risk factors are divided into modifiable factors (e.g., environment, sedentary, smoking, alcohol consumption, hypertension, diabetes) and non-modifiable factors (e.g., age, gender, race, and genetics) [10]. Previous epidemiological studies showed that air pollution has association with AF, and exposure to a certain level of air pollutants may significantly affect the incidence of AF [11, 12]. A 16-year study in the US found an association between exposure to air pollution and increased incidence of AF [13]. A study in Swedish, found a positive correlation between the increase in PM2.5 concentration and AF morbidity [14]. A study in Rome suggests an association between air pollutant exposure and emergency room visits for atrial fibrillation [15]. A UK study conducted using three national databases revealed that NO2 was related to the occurrence of AF, and PM2.5 was related to the increased mortality associated with AF [16]. A study in Beijing, China found that the risk of AF increased by 3.8% and 2.7% for every 10 µg/m3 increase in PM2.5 and PM10 concentration, respectively [17]. A study in Taiwan also found that AF was significantly associated with an increase in PM2.5 concentration [18]. These studies confirmed the association between air pollution and AF. However, most of these studies focused on the impact of PM on AF only. Few analyzed the impacts of other major air pollutants on AF in the general population. Moreover, most previous studies were conducted in developed countries or regions, while countries or regions with different economic strengths often have different levels of air pollution. This factor may affect the research results. Finally, previous studies have focused on specific populations, such as the elderly and special patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) or pacemakers [19]. The investigation results of specific study populations may not be applicable to the general population because of the likely probability of co-developing heart failure and coronary heart disease.

Contrarily, other studies found that there was no significant association between the number of inpatients with AF and short-term exposures to air pollution. For example, a study in Utah, USA, showed that the hospitalization rate of AF did not increase with the short-term increase in PM exposure [20]. However, this study was conducted in developed countries, where there are differences in economic levels, demographics and lifestyle habits between developed and developing countries, and the results may not be applicable to developing countries. Therefore, more studies are needed to analyze whether air pollutants increase the risk of AF.

Sichuan Province is located in the southwest of China and covers 2.7% of China’s geographical area. By the end of 2021, Sichuan’s total GDP ranked sixth in China, with its per capita GDP at 18th in China and less than more than 50% of the provinces in China. These confirmed that Sichuan is an economically underdeveloped province. However, Sichuan is more polluted than developed areas with its anthropogenic emissions of PM2.5, PM10, SO2, and NOx accounting for 6.4%, 5.7%, 8.2%, and 4.2% of China’s total emissions, respectively[21]. These numbers all exceed Sichuan’s geographical area in proportion to China’s total area. Due to the topography of the basin, air pollutant concentrations in Sichuan Province are consistently higher compared to other areas of China with high air pollution [22]. Therefore, Sichuan was selected as an example of an economically underdeveloped and heavily polluted region to conduct a time series study of crossover cases. The impact of major air pollutants on the number of inpatients with AF was analyzed. Longer lag structures and potential confounding factors were also explored.

Materials and methods

Hospitalization data

The hospitalization data of AF cases from 2017 to 2018 were collected from 123 medical institutions in nine cities and prefectures of the Sichuan Province, including Chengdu, Guang’an, Luzhou, Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Mianyang, Meishan, Nanchong, Yibin, and Zigong. Medical institutions are all types of hospitals in the area, including general hospitals, Chinese medicine hospitals, specialist hospitals and private hospitals, but we have excluded some lower rated hospitals. The collected data included age, sex, home address, date of admission, disease diagnosis, comorbid diagnosis, treatment cost, and disease code of the patient. The study population was drawn from our database of collected hospitalisations, defined as patients admitted to hospital for an episode of AF, whose admission diagnosis was completed by a clinician. After excluding invalid cases with missing personal information, inaccurate diagnosis, living outside the study area, and no cost information, the data from 5,958 inpatients with AF and the ICD-10 code I48 according to the criteria of the International Classification of Diseases were analyzed to determine the impact of air pollutants on the number of inpatients with AF and the economic burden attributable to the disease.

Pollutants and meteorological data

The air pollutant data came from 183 provincial-level air quality monitoring stations, covering 21 cities and prefectures in the Sichuan Province. The data included the daily average concentrations of PM2.5 with an average aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 μm, PM10 with an average aerodynamic diameter of less than 10 μm, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), ozone (O3), and carbon monoxide (CO). The air pollutant monitoring in each station was conducted strictly according to the air pollution monitoring standard procedure promulgated by China. The meteorological data came from the same source as the air pollutant data, including 24-h mean temperature (°C) and relative humidity (%).

Notably, the pollutant concentration data obtained from fixed air quality monitors do not reflect the actual exposure level of individuals and cannot compensate for the missing data. However, the spatial models can effectively account for these errors. Spatial interpolation is a commonly used modeling method [23]. The spatial interpolation method can make use of the existing monitoring stations’ data to estimate the values of the measured points and generate a high-precision spatial surface model, which can effectively repair the missing observation data and obtain precise individual exposure levels. The inverse distance weighted interpolation (IDW), a commonly used spatial interpolation method, was used in this study to estimate the exposure levels among the patients using the patients’ most recent monitoring station data and supplement the missing data that could not be obtained from the monitoring stations. The interpolation resolution was 0.05° × 0.05°.

Statistical analysis

The daily hospitalized cases of AF generally follow Poisson’s distribution. The conditional Poisson regression linear model and the time-stratified crossover case design are mature methods used to study the correlation between air pollutants and diseases [24]. The time-stratified crossover case design is similar to the time-stratified case–control study. Janes et al. found through their statistical simulation that the time-stratified crossover case study can simultaneously control confounding factors, such as seasonal and “day of the week” effects, eliminate temporal trend bias, and obtain an unbiased estimation of parameters with conditional logistic regression [25]. In this study, the admission date of the AF patients was taken as the case date. The control day was selected as the same day of the week in the same month and the same year by the time stratification method. The air pollutant concentration on the admission day was compared with that on the control day. Then, the correlation between the daily number of inpatients with AF and the air pollutants was analyzed using conditional logistic regression. Moreover, meteorological factors may affect the number of AF cases. Therefore, the daily ambient temperature and the relative humidity were introduced into the model as control variables to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the number of inpatients with AF when the concentration unit of the air pollutant changes.

Previous studies showed that air pollution has a lag effect on health [26, 27]. To fully study the lag pattern of the correlation between AF and various air pollutants, a lag structure was constructed from the day of admission (lag0) to 7 days before admission (lag7) to evaluate the 1-day lag effect. The cumulative impact of the pollutants on AF was assessed by fitting the air pollutants’ concentrations and calculating the moving average from the day of admission to 7 days before admission (i.e., from lg01 to lg07). Then, a stratified analysis was conducted by age (less than 65 years, greater than or equal to 65 years), gender (male, female), and season (cold season: November to April; warm season: May to October) to further explore the impact of air pollutants on the number of inpatients with AF. The test formula for possible differences between different subgroups is shown in Eq. (1):

$$D\left( {95\% } \right) = \left( {\hat{Q}1 - \hat{Q}2} \right) \pm 1.96\sqrt {\mathop {\left( {S\hat{E}1} \right)}\nolimits^{2} + \mathop {\left( {S\hat{E}2} \right)}\nolimits^{2} }$$
(1)

where Q1 and Q2 are the estimated values of the effects of different categories of people affected by air pollutants between different layers. SE1 and SE2 are their corresponding standard deviations.

Based on the attribution risk analysis, the number of AF inpatients and the related economic cost attributable to air pollution was estimated[28]. The reference concentration was based on the Word Health Organization (WHO) air quality guidelines (i.e., 24 h mean of 15 μg/m3 for PM2.5; 24 h mean of 45 μg/m3 for PM10)[29]. The calculation formulae are shown in Eqs. (2)–(4):

$${\text{AN}}_{i} = {\text{HAsi}}*\left( {1 - {\text{exp}}\left( { - \beta *\Delta {\text{CP}}_{{i - t}} } \right)} \right)$$
(2)
$${\text{AC}}_{{{\text{ytotal}}}} {\text{ = AN}}_{{\text{y}}} \,{\text{*}}\,{\text{Cost}}_{{{\text{ytotal}}}} \,{\text{*}}\,{\text{Cpl}}_{{\text{y}}}$$
(3)
$${\text{AC}}_{{{\text{ypocket}}}} {\text{ = AN}}_{{\text{y}}} *{\text{Cost}}_{{{\text{ypocket}}}}* {\text{Cpl}}_{{\text{y}}}$$
(4)

where ANi is the number of AF inpatients attributed to exposure to air pollutants on the ith day. β is the expose–response coefficient between air pollutants and the number of AF inpatients. ΔCPi-t is the difference between the observed concentration and the reference concentration of the air pollutants on the ith day. HAsi is the number of the AF inpatients on the ith day. ACytotal and ACypocket represent the total hospitalization cost and the out-of-pocket cost caused by excessive exposure to air pollutants for y years. ANy is the sum of y years. Costytotal and Costypocket represent the average total hospitalization cost and the average out-of-pocket cost per case of y years, respectively. Cply is the consumer price index from year of y + 1 to 2018. The concentration standard proposed by the WHO is the theoretical minimum threshold level, below which the air pollutants have no impact on health.

Robustness analysis

We estimated the robustness of the results by adding another pollutant to the primary model of each pollutant to construct a two-pollutant model. Moreover, to eliminate the pollutant concentration error caused by the excessive remote distance between the patient’s residence and the air monitoring station, the “Distance to the nearest hub” and the “Distance matrix” kits in the QGIS software were used to eliminate the patients whose residence is outside a 50 km range of an air monitoring station. The daily average exposure of air pollutants was recalculated and substituted into the model. The daily average temperature and humidity were also controlled in the same manner. Sensitivity analysis was conducted again to further verify the stability of the results [30].

All the analyses were performed using the statistical software R (version 4.0.1, R Core Team, 2019, https://www.R-project.org). The statistical test was two-tailed and P < 0.05 means statistically significant.

Results

Data description

Descriptive results are shown in Table 1. A total of 5,958 patients with AF from 123 hospitals in nine cities and prefectures of the Sichuan Province from 2017 to 2018 were included in this study. There were 3102 females (52.06% of the total), which was slightly more than the number of male patients. The proportion of the elderly patients, aged over 65 years and above, was high, accounting for 65.41% and 3,897 patients. The number of inpatients in warm seasons was slightly more than that in cold seasons, accounting for 3,089 (51.85%). The total hospitalization expense per time and the out-of-pocket expense per time were 32,300 million Chinese yuan (CNY) and 15,700 CNY, respectively. During the 2-year study period, PM2.5 and PM10 pollutions were the most serious, with 698 and 506 days of average daily concentrations exceeding the WHO standard, respectively, and the average daily concentrations were 42.80 and 66.57 μg/m3, respectively. The daily average concentrations of NO2, O3, CO, and SO2 were 29.80, 83.42, 0.76, and 10.62 μg/m3, respectively. The daily mean values of the temperature and humidity were 17.63 ℃ and 77.46%, respectively. The analysis of the correlation between various pollutants and meteorological factors is shown in Additional file 1: Table S1. PM2.5 is positively correlated with other pollutants, except for O3, and has the strongest correlation with PM10 (r = 0.95, P < 0.05). There was a moderate correlation between air pollutants and meteorological factors.

Table 1 Descriptive statistics of inpatients characteristics, air pollutants, and meteorological factors from 2017 to 2018
Full size table

Effect of air pollution exposure on the total population and the subgroups

In the single pollutant model, the association between the air pollutants of different lag days and the number of inpatients with AF is shown in Fig 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Changes in the risk of hospitalization in AF patients in a single pollutant model

Full size image

In general, PM2.5, PM10, CO, and SO2 were significantly associated with the number of inpatients with AF. The influence of other air pollutants on the number of inpatients with AF was not observed. In contrast, the impacts of PM2.5 and PM10 on the number of AF cases in lag1–lag3 and lag01–lag07 were observed, with the impact of PM2.5 in lag05 being the largest, where the number of AF cases increased by 2.5% (95% CI = 1.006 to 1.044) when the PM2.5 concentration increased by 10 μg/m3. The maximum impact of PM10 was observed in lag07. When the PM10 concentration increased by 10 μg/m3, the number of AF cases increased by 1.8% (95% CI 1.003, 1.033). The impact of CO on the number of AF cases was observed in lag1–lag4 and lag01–lag07, and the impact was most significant in lag07. The number of inpatients with AF increased by 3.9% (95% CI = 1.010–1.070) when the CO concentration increased by 0.1 μg/m3. In lag2, SO2 also affected the number of AF cases, which increased by 12.7% (95% CI = 1.006–1.262) when the SO2 concentration increased by every 10 μg/m3. The specific results of the single pollutant model are shown in Additional file 1: Table S2.

Figure 2 shows the stratified analysis results by age, season, and gender. Compared with the under 65-year-old population, PM2.5 and PM10 impacted the elderly patients, aged 65 years and above, more significantly (P < 0.05). Every 10 μg/m3 increase in the PM2.5 or PM10 concentration, the number of inpatients with AF increased by 2.4% (95% CI = 1.004 to 1.044) and 0.4% (95% CI = 1.018 to 1.033); The effect of SO2 on the number of AF cases was more significant in female inpatients, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Every 10 μg/m3 increase in SO2 concentration caused the number of inpatients with AF to increase by 20.3% (95% CI = 1.033 to 1.401). No statistically significant difference was found in the subgroup comparison of other pollutants.

Fig.  2
figure 2

Changes in hospitalization risks among patients with AF in different subgroups

Full size image

Robustness test

Table 2 shows the results of the dual-pollutant model. With the addition of other pollutants, the results of PM2.5 and PM10 remained stable. However, with the addition of CO, the correlation between CO and AF was weakened. Similarly, with the addition of PM2.5 and PM10 to the CO model, the association between CO and AF was also weakened. With the addition of other pollutants, the association between CO and AF remained stable. Only when NO2 and O3 were added to the SO2 model, the association between SO2 and AF was stable. When PM2.5, PM10, and CO were added, the association between SO2 and AF became weakened. Note that PM2.5, PM10, and CO had significant correlations with AF in the single pollutant models. After 17 patients’ data were eliminated, because they lived more than 50 km away from the air monitoring station, the association between the air pollutants (PM2.5, PM10, CO, and SO2) and the number of inpatients with AF was still significant, compared with the results without the elimination. Moreover, the number of days to reach the maximum effect remained unchanged. The variation ranges of OR and the 95% CI were all less than 0.01%, showing good robustness in the results.

Table 2 Association of patients with atrial fibrillation with air pollutants in a dual-pollutant model
Full size table

Attributable risks and economic costs caused by air pollutants

Because PM2.5 and PM10 had the highest pollution levels, the longest duration, and the greatest negative health impact during the period of this study, only PM2.5 and PM10 were further analyzed for attributable risks from a conservative point of view. The results are shown in Table 3. Based on the WHO air quality guidelines, 430 patients were admitted to the hospital with AF from 2017 to 2018 due to excessive exposure to PM2.5. For PM10 exposure, the counterpart number of patients was 209. In terms of medical expenses, a total of 1398.31 CNY of total hospitalization expenses and 6.81 million CNY of out-of-pocket expenses were related to excessive exposure to PM2.5, while 6.68 million CNY of total hospitalization expenses and 3.28 million CNY of out-of-pocket expenses were related to excessive exposure to PM10.

Table 3 Number of AF inpatients and economic cost attributed to PM exposure in 2017–2018
Full size table

Discussion

Based on the time-series crossover case study, it was found that short-term exposure to air pollutants significantly affects the number of inpatients with AF. As mentioned earlier, PM2.5, PM10, CO, and SO2 were related to an increase in the number of AF cases once the confounding factors, such as temperature, relative humidity, and holidays, were controlled. However, such a strong relationship was not observed for NO2 and O3. The stratified analysis found that elderly patients were more likely to be affected by PM2.5 and PM10, while women were more likely to be affected by SO2. Based on the pollutant concentration in the WHO air quality guidelines, the AF detected in 639 inpatients was attributed to PM2.5 and PM10. The total hospitalization expense due to excessive exposure to particle pollutants was 20.67 million CNY, and the out-of-pocket expense was 10.83 million CNY.

Our results are consistent with existing studies. These results validated the hypothesis that short-term exposures to air pollutants increased the risk of hospitalization due to AF [31,32,33]. The mechanisms of AF induced by air pollutants are complex and diverse. Although there is no specific theory, there are several possible reasons to explain this relationship. First, previous studies confirmed that air pollutants can cause acute autonomic nervous dysfunction [34, 35], which in turn, can lead to reduced heart rate variability. Therefore, AF may be caused by autonomic nervous dysfunction. Second, air pollutants can also lead to platelet activation, promote thrombosis, and cause myocardial infarction, which damages and destroys the heart, leading to thickness changes in the myocardial fibers or heart muscle. This can cause abnormal cardiac electrical activities and AF [36]. Finally, air pollution promotes systemic vascular oxidative stress, with subsequent endothelial dysfunction, monocyte activation and some pro-atherogenic changes in lipoproteins [37].

On the day of admission (lag0), there was no detectable air pollutant effect on the number of inpatients with AF inpatients. Instead, a significant lag effect was observed. This is consistent with previous research results. In the single pollutant model, when the concentration of PM2.5, PM10, or SO2 increased by 10 μg/m3 or the concentration of CO increased by 0.1 μg/m3, the number of inpatients with AF increased, and the percentage increase reached the greatest for lag05, lag07, lag1, and lag07, respectively. When analyzing the association between weather, air pollution, and the number of ambulance calls caused by AF, Jone et al. found that PM10 was positively association with the number of ambulance calls on lag4 and lag7 [38]. Marcus et al. found that PM10 exposure for lag12–24 h during increased the risk of AF in the general population [39]. A study conducted by Liang et al. in Beijing also showed that as time passed, the AF risk of patients visiting the emergency room increased. On lag6, there was a positive correlation between the air pollutants and AF [40]. The results of this study showed evidence that air pollutants are risk factors for the occurrence of AF. As stated by Haley et al. when PM2.5-related treatment can be applied to hospitalized patients with cardiovascular diseases, and that different lag time caused different effects [41]. Our study clarified the timepoints during the course of the impact of air pollutants on AF-related admissions. The findings of this study may contribute to the prevention and treatment of AF.

In the dual-pollutant model, it was observed that adding another pollutant weakened the correlation that was significant in the single-pollutant model, e.g., adding CO to the PM model or adding PM to the SO2 model. The possible reason for this phenomenon is that the air pollutant is a complex mixture of gas, volatile droplets, and particulate matter. SO2, NO2, and volatile organic compounds are the main precursors of PM. Therefore, these pollutants do not affect each other independently. Instead, they affect each other due to their common source [42]. Therefore, the individual correlation between each air pollutant and the number of inpatients with AF needs to be considered with caution.

The subgroup analysis found that elderly patients are more susceptible to PM. This is in line with a previous study conducted in Italy [18]. The reason for this observation may be because elderly patients have a high prevalence of cardiopulmonary diseases due to frailty, while the mechanism of AF involves inflammation and atrial pressure. Patients with cardiopulmonary insufficiency have a greater risk of AF [16, 43]. We also found that women were more sensitive to air pollutants, possibly because of their exposure times and biological differences. According to “the Handbook of Population Exposure Factors in China” [44], men and women spend different time outdoor (258 min for women and 210 min for men per day). Women may also be weaker in constitution, and thus, air pollutants may deposit in their lungs more easily [45].

To quantify the health benefits of reducing air pollution concentrations, PM was selected in this study to obtain more robust results relating to the economic burden attributable to air pollution, based on the unique characteristics of the air pollutants in Sichuan Province. It was found that the economic burden and the number of hospitalized patients caused by PM2.5 pollution were 13.98 CNY and 430 people, respectively, both higher than the results given by PM10. The reason being PM2.5 enter bronchioles and alveoli easily due to the small diameters of less than 5 µm [34]. The soluble components of PM2.5 can directly enter blood circulation through alveolar epithelial cells, stimulate inflammatory cells, and immune cells, to release pro-inflammatory factors, leading to oxidative stress and inflammatory response to cause indirect damage of the body [46, 47]. This is the first assessment of the economic burden of AF hospitalization as attributed to air pollution in the Sichuan Province. This study provided significant evidence supporting the impact of air pollution on public health, which include economic burdens.

This study has several limitations. First, like most epidemiological studies on acute effects, this study adopted the average concentration of the monitoring stations to calculate the exposure level, which cannot reflect the actual levels of individual exposures. Although the IDW interpolation method was used to estimate individual exposure levels, deviations are possible. Second, patient characteristics were not collected completely, such as BMI, whether they smoked, and whether they wore ICDs. This prevented us from conducting more detailed subgroup analyses to obtain more comprehensive results. Third, the economic burden of air pollution may be underestimated, because the data collected were hospitalization data, which only covered the total hospitalization and the out-of-pocket costs, without including the outpatient costs. Finally, our study of patients hospitalised for symptomatic episodes of atrial fibrillation did not distinguish whether these patients had new-onset or old-onset atrial fibrillation, so we cannot know whether there is a trend toward an increased incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation due to air pollution. However, this is a major goal for our future research.

Conclusions

This study revealed that short-term exposure to air pollution increased the risk of AF hospitalization and led to a substantial financial burden. Our results contribute to existing evidence that air pollution can cause AF and damage health. We recommend the need to reduce air pollution to reduce health risks.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Awan FT, Tong D, Zaha VG (2020) Cardio-oncology: a win-win situation: how solving the mystery of an ibrutinib off-target effect reveals new insights into atrial fibrillation mechanisms. Circulation 142:2456–2458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang WY, Du X, Fawzy AM, He L, Li HW, Dong JZ, Lip GYH, Ma CS (2021) Associations of atrial fibrillation progression with clinical risk factors and clinical prognosis: a report from the Chinese Atrial Fibrillation Registry study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 32:333–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Boriani G, Castella M, Dan GA, Dilaveris PE, Fauchier L, Filippatos G, Kalman JM, La Meir M, Lane DA, Lebeau JP, Lettino M, Lip GYH, Pinto FJ, Thomas GN, Valgimigli M, Van Gelder IC, Van Putte BP, Watkins CL (2021) 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): the Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 42:373–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zulkifly H, Lip GYH, Lane DA (2018) Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation. Int J Clin Pract 72:e13070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Santos IS, Goulart AC, Olmos RD, Thomas GN, Lip GYH, Lotufo PA, Benseñor IM (2020) Atrial fibrillation in low- and middle-income countries: a narrative review. Eur Heart J Suppl 22:O61-o77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shi S, Tang Y, Zhao Q, Yan H, Yu B, Zheng Q, Li Y, Zheng L, Yuan Y, Zhong J, Xu J, Wu Y, Xu J, Chen L, Li S, Jiang J, Wang J, Fan J, Chen M, Tang B, Li W, Wu Q, Shi B, Zhou S, Zhao X, Yin Y, Zhang Z, Zhong G, Han X, Liu F, Wu M, Gao L, Yang B, Huang H, Huang C (2022) Prevalence and risk of atrial fibrillation in China: a national cross-sectional epidemiological study. Lancet Reg Health West Pac 23:100439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Z, Chen Z, Wang X, Zhang L, Li S, Tian Y, Shao L, Hu H, Gao R (2018) The disease burden of atrial fibrillation in china from a national cross-sectional survey. Am J Cardiol 122:793–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Romero JR, Wolf PA (2013) Epidemiology of stroke: legacy of the framingham heart study. Glob Heart 8:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang YJ, Li ZX, Gu HQ, Zhai Y, Zhou Q, Jiang Y, Zhao XQ, Wang YL, Yang X, Wang CJ, Meng X, Li H, Liu LP, Jing J, Wu J, Xu AD, Dong Q, Wang D, Wang WZ, Ma XD, Zhao JZ (2022) China Stroke Statistics: an update on the 2019 report from the National Center for Healthcare Quality Management in Neurological Diseases, China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, the Chinese Stroke Association, National Center for Chronic and Non-communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention and Institute for Global Neuroscience and Stroke Collaborations. Stroke Vasc Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2020-000457

  10. Zhang J, Johnsen SP, Guo Y, Lip GYH (2021) Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: geographic/ecological risk factors, age, sex, genetics. Card Electrophysiol Clin 13:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Amsalu E, Wang T, Li H, Liu Y, Wang A, Liu X, Tao L, Luo Y, Zhang F, Yang X, Li X, Wang W, Guo X (2019) Acute effects of fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) on hospital admissions for cardiovascular disease in Beijing, China: a time-series study. Environ Health 18:70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hayes RB, Lim C, Zhang Y, Cromar K, Shao Y, Reynolds HR, Silverman DT, Jones RR, Park Y, Jerrett M, Ahn J, Thurston GD (2020) PM2.5 air pollution and cause-specific cardiovascular disease mortality. Int J Epidemiol 49:25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jin T, Di Q, Réquia WJ, Danesh Yazdi M, Castro E, Ma T, Wang Y, Zhang H, Shi L, Schwartz J (2022) Associations between long-term air pollution exposure and the incidence of cardiovascular diseases among American older adults. Environ Int 170:107594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dahlquist M, Frykman V, Stafoggia M, Qvarnström E, Wellenius GA, Ljungman PLS (2022) Short-term ambient air pollution exposure and risk of atrial fibrillation in patients with intracardiac devices. Environ Epidemiol 6:e215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Solimini AG, Renzi M (2017) Association between air pollution and emergency room visits for atrial fibrillation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14060661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Milojevic A, Wilkinson P, Armstrong B, Bhaskaran K, Smeeth L, Hajat S (2014) Short-term effects of air pollution on a range of cardiovascular events in England and Wales: case-crossover analysis of the MINAP database, hospital admissions and mortality. Heart 100:1093–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu X, Kong D, Liu Y, Fu J, Gao P, Chen T, Fang Q, Cheng K, Fan Z (2018) Effects of the short-term exposure to ambient air pollution on atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 41:1441–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee HH, Pan SC, Chen BY, Lo SH, Guo YL (2019) Atrial fibrillation hospitalization is associated with exposure to fine particulate air pollutants. Environ Health 18:117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yue C, Yang F, Wang L, Li F, Chen Y (2020) Association between fine particulate matter and atrial fibrillation in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 59:595–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bunch TJ, Horne BD, Asirvatham SJ, Day JD, Crandall BG, Weiss JP, Osborn JS, Anderson JL, Muhlestein JB, Lappe DL, Pope CA 3rd (2011) Atrial fibrillation hospitalization is not increased with short-term elevations in exposure to fine particulate air pollution. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 34:1475–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang Q, Streets DG, Carmichael GR, He K, Huo H, Kannari A, Klimont Z, Park I, Reddy S et al (2009) Asian emissions in 2006 for the NASA INTEX-B mission. Atmos Chem Phys 9:5131–5153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kong L, Tan Q, Feng M, Qu Y, An J, Liu X, Cheng N, Deng Y, Zhai R, Wang Z (2020) Investigating the characteristics and source analyses of PM(2.5) seasonal variations in Chengdu. Southwest China. Chemosphere 243:125267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. De Smith MJ, Goodchild MF, Longley P (2007) Geospatial analysis: a comprehensive guide to principles, techniques and software tools. Winchelsea: Troubador publishing ltd

  24. Ho AFW, Zheng H, Earnest A, Cheong KH, Pek PP, Seok JY, Liu N, Kwan YH, Tan JWC, Wong TH, Hausenloy DJ, Foo LL, Tan BYQ, Ong MEH (2019) Time-stratified case crossover study of the association of outdoor ambient air pollution with the risk of acute myocardial infarction in the context of seasonal exposure to the southeast asian haze problem. J Am Heart Assoc 8:e011272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Janes H, Sheppard L, Lumley T (2005) Case-crossover analyses of air pollution exposure data: referent selection strategies and their implications for bias. Epidemiology 16:717–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Qiu H, Wang L, Zhou L, Pan J (2020) Coarse particles (PM(2.5–10)) and cause-specific hospitalizations in southwestern China: association, attributable risk and economic costs. Environ Res 190:110004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jiang W, Chen H, Liao J, Yang X, Yang B, Zhang Y, Pan X, Lian L, Yang L (2022) The short-term effects and burden of particle air pollution on hospitalization for coronary heart disease: a time-stratified case-crossover study in Sichuan. China Environ Health 21:19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu Z, Chen X, Li G, Tian L, Wang Z, Xiong X, Yang C, Zhou Z, Pan X (2020) Attributable risk and economic cost of hospital admissions for mental disorders due to PM(2.5) in Beijing. Sci Total Environ 718:137274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. WHO (2021) WHO global air quality guidelines: particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. Geneva: World Health Organization. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO

  30. Liu Y, Pan J, Zhang H, Shi C, Li G, Peng Z, Ma J, Zhou Y, Zhang L (2019) Short-Term Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution and Asthma Mortality. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 200:24–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kwon OK, Kim SH, Kang SH, Cho Y, Oh IY, Yoon CH, Kim SY, Kim OJ, Choi EK, Youn TJ, Chae IH (2019) Association of short- and long-term exposure to air pollution with atrial fibrillation. Eur J Prev Cardiol 26:1208–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shin S, Burnett RT, Kwong JC, Hystad P, van Donkelaar A, Brook JR, Goldberg MS, Tu K, Copes R, Martin RV, Liu Y, Kopp A, Chen H (2019) Ambient air pollution and the risk of atrial fibrillation and stroke: a population-based cohort study. Environ Health Perspect 127:87009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yue C, Yang F, Li F, Chen Y (2021) Association between air pollutants and atrial fibrillation in general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 208:111508

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Arias-Pérez RD, Taborda NA, Gómez DM, Narvaez JF, Porras J, Hernandez JC (2020) Inflammatory effects of particulate matter air pollution. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 27:42390–42404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lederer AM, Fredriksen PM, Nkeh-Chungag BN, Everson F, Strijdom H, De Boever P, Goswami N (2021) Cardiovascular effects of air pollution: current evidence from animal and human studies. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 320:H1417-h1439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Robertson S, Miller MR (2018) Ambient air pollution and thrombosis. Part Fibre Toxicol 15:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Argacha JF, Bourdrel T, van de Borne P (2018) Ecology of the cardiovascular system: a focus on air-related environmental factors. Trends Cardiovasc Med 28:112–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Vencloviene J, Babarskiene RM, Dobozinskas P, Dedele A, Lopatiene K, Ragaisyte N (2017) The short-term associations of weather and air pollution with emergency ambulance calls for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24:15031–15043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Dahlquist M, Frykman V, Kemp-Gudmunsdottir K, Svennberg E, Wellenius GA (2020) Short-term associations between ambient air pollution and acute atrial fibrillation episodes. Environ Int 141:105765

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Liang B, He X, Du X, Liu X, Ma C (2021) Effect of air quality on the risk of emergency room visits in patients with atrial fibrillation. Front Cardiovasc Med 8:672745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Haley VB, Talbot TO, Felton HD (2009) Surveillance of the short-term impact of fine particle air pollution on cardiovascular disease hospitalizations in New York State. Environ Health 8:42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mannucci PM, Harari S, Franchini M (2019) Novel evidence for a greater burden of ambient air pollution on cardiovascular disease. Haematologica 104:2349–2357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Zheng Q, Liu H, Zhang J, Chen D (2018) The effect of ambient particle matters on hospital admissions for cardiac arrhythmia: a multi-city case-crossover study in China. Environ Health 17:60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. China MoEPotPsRo (2013) Exposure factors handbook of Chinese population. China Environmtal Science Press, Beijing, p 366

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kan H, London SJ, Chen G, Zhang Y, Song G, Zhao N, Jiang L, Chen B (2008) Season, sex, age, and education as modifiers of the effects of outdoor air pollution on daily mortality in Shanghai, China: the Public Health and Air Pollution in Asia (PAPA) Study. Environ Health Perspect 116:1183–1188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Fiordelisi A, Piscitelli P, Trimarco B, Coscioni E, Iaccarino G, Sorriento D (2017) The mechanisms of air pollution and particulate matter in cardiovascular diseases. Heart Fail Rev 22:337–347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Thurston GD, Kipen H, Annesi-Maesano I, Balmes J, Brook RD, Cromar K, De Matteis S, Forastiere F, Forsberg B, Frampton MW, Grigg J, Heederik D, Kelly FJ, Kuenzli N, Laumbach R, Peters A, Rajagopalan ST, Rich D, Ritz B, Samet JM, Sandstrom T, Sigsgaard T, Sunyer J, Brunekreef B (2017) A joint ERS/ATS policy statement: what constitutes an adverse health effect of air pollution? An analytical framework. Eur Respir J 49:1600419

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the responsible person of local medical institutions, all participants and the staff of data reduction for their cooperation.

Funding

The authors received financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 72174032).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public Health, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610075, Sichuan, China

    Chengwei Lin, Wanyanhan Jiang, Xi Gao, Yi He & Lian Yang

  2. School of Management, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610075, Sichuan, China

    Jia Li

Authors
  1. Chengwei Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jia Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wanyanhan Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xi Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yi He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lian Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CL: formal analysis, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, visualization. WJ: conceptualization, methodology, software. XG, YH and JL: data curation. LY: writing—reviewing and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lian Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent for publication

All participants provided written informed consent prior to participation.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. Detailed results of Pearson correlation analysis and Time series analysis. Table S1.

Pearson correlation coefficient of air pollutants, temperature, and relative humidity in nine cities and prefectures of Sichuan Province, China in 2017–2018. Table S2. Changes in the hospitalization risk of AF patients with increasing air pollutant concentrations of 10 μg/m3 (PM2.5, PM10, SO2) or 0.1 μg/m3 (CO) in the single pollutant model.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, C., Li, J., Jiang, W. et al. Risk and economic cost of hospitalization due to atrial fibrillation caused by air pollution: a multi-city time series analysis. Environ Sci Eur 35, 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00709-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00709-w

Keywords