Skip to content

Advertisement

  • RESEARCH
  • Open Access

The depuration fate of the mixtures of CdS/ZnS quantum dots (QDs) with different surface coatings on mangrove and wheat root epidermis: results from a novel method

Contributed equally
Environmental Sciences Europe201931:18

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-019-0199-8

  • Received: 27 December 2018
  • Accepted: 21 February 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

The depuration fate of mixtures of metal-based quantum dots (QDs) in root epidermis is an important factor that determined their follow-up transportation and transformation processes in plant. However, the related mechanisms are poorly understood due to the lack of appropriate quantitative methods.

Results

In our study, a novel method for in situ determination of mixtures of CdS/ZnS QDs with different surface coatings located on root epidermis was developed using an excitation–emission matrix combined with multi-way parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) and n-way partial least squares (n-PLS). Then, the fates of CdS/ZnS QDs on mangrove and wheat root epidermis were investigated using the established method. During the rapid dissipation stage, intracellular and intercellular degradation of metal ions instead of transportation and rhizophytic bacteria degradation was the predominant reasons for the reduction in the CdS/ZnS QDs mixtures. However, due to vertical migration of CdS/ZnS QDs in the slow depuration stage, negative linear relationships were observed between the Ks values of oleic acid-CdS/ZnS QDs and the polarity index of the root epidermis (p < 0.05), which further indicated a difference between the single and mixture QDs.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this study provided a new approach to investigate the fate of QDs located on root epidermis and revealed the related mechanisms.

Keywords

  • Depurations
  • Mixture
  • CdS/ZnS QDs
  • In situ

Background

Semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) have been classified as a new class of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs), which are used in many applications due to their unique optical and electrical properties [13], and global production reached 55 t/y in 2012 [4, 5]. The growing prevalence of QDs, especially metal-based QDs, in conjunction with the risk of unwanted/unanticipated biota exposure renders them a potential concern [6, 7]. For example, Pasquali et al. demonstrated that a variety of negative effects, including increased reactive oxygen species levels and decreased glutathione levels, were observed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast cells after exposure to CdS QDs [8]. Modlitbová et al. confirmed that the toxicity of CdTe QDs is similar to that of CdCl2 for the model plant Allium cepa L. [9].

ENM uptake by roots, including metal-based QDs, has been confirmed to be one of the most important pathways for plant contamination and subsequent biota exposure through the food chain [1012]. Al-Salim et al. first confirmed that four different surface coatings (cysteine-, mercaptosuccinic acid-, glycine- and amine-conjugated) of CdS/ZnS QDs were transported to the limited zones in onion (Allium cepa), chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum sp.) and ryegrass (Lolium perenne) roots [13]. The results from in situ two-photon laser confocal scanning fluorescence microscopy (TPLCSM) further validated that the root epidermis was the limiting zone for nearly all of the remaining N-acetyl cysteine-coated CdS:Mn/ZnS QDs [14].

However, some recent studies have demonstrated that ENMs located on the root epidermis are not stable and are easily depurated through many pathways [15, 16]. For example, CeO2 nanoparticles (NPs) are partly biotransformed from Ce(IV) to Ce(III) in the root surface of hydroponic plants with the aid of the interactions between the NPs and root exudates [17]. Montes et al. concluded that other kinds of metal NPs, including polyacrylic acid (PAA)-/polyethylenimine (PEI)-coated Fe2O3 and TiO2 NPs, displayed similar depuration behaviors on Arabidopsis thaliana root epidermis [18]. In this respect, metal-based QDs located on root epidermis may undergo degradation, desorption and transportation processes. However, until now, no corresponding studies have confirmed our assumption and the contributions of individual processes to total depuration. Moreover, metal-based QDs with different surface coatings often exist as a mixture in soil/sediment and water [19]. Due to their different physicochemical characteristics, the interactions of different kinds of ENMs in higher plant roots may directly induce changes in the selective substance transmembrane transport kinetics of the plasma membrane H+-ATPase [20, 21], which also needs special attention.

Limited by an appropriate quantification analytical method, few studies have focused on investigating the depuration of mixture CdS/ZnS QDs located on the root epidermis. Inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) has long been considered as an effective approach to determine trace concentrations of metal-based QDs in environmental samples, including water, soil/sediment and biota [2224]. However, the ICP-MS method does not yet possess the spatial resolution required for completely degraded QDs in environmental samples, which occurs during pretreatment procedures, [25, 26] and thus, the method cannot quantify this fraction of metal-based QDs.

As the metal-based QDs have high fluorescence quantum yield, the single wavelength fluorescence spectra combined with fluorescence microscopy techniques have been widely used to in situ determine the metal-based QDs in specific locations of environmental samples [27, 28]. Unfortunately, further studies have demonstrated that the sensitivity and selectivity of this standard fluorescence spectroscopy method significantly decrease in the presence of the strong autofluorescence of root tissues [29]. To overcome such drawbacks, an in situ accurate nanosecond time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy (NTFS) method was recently established to detect CdS/ZnS QDs located on mangrove root epidermis. The detection limits are as low as 1.2–2.0 ng/spot for CdS/ZnS QDs with different surface coatings [30]. Nevertheless, the excitation–emission and time-resolved fluorescence spectra of the QDs overlapped, and thus, determining mixtures of metal-based QDs located on root epidermis is impossible.

As Carabajal et al. reported, parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) and n-way partial least squares (n-PLS) based on excitation–emission matrix fluorescence spectra have been used to quantify mixture components with strong fluorescence signals [31]. For example, Yang et al. simultaneously identified and quantified multiple components of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the presence of humic acids with similarities above 0.980 for the resolved and reference spectra [32]. Therefore, combining the PARAFAC/n-PLS technique with the NTFS method may provide the ability to establish a novel in situ quantification method for mixtures of metal-based QDs that well fits our requirements.

The objectives of this study were to (1) improve the selectivity of the NTFS method to fit the requirements to determine the mixtures of CdS/ZnS QDs, (2) investigate the depuration fate of the mixtures of CdS/ZnS QDs located on root epidermis and (3) further explore the related mechanisms of mixtures of CdS/ZnS QDs depurated on the root epidermis. Mixtures of CdS/ZnS QDs with different surface coatings (oleic acid–, PEG-COOH– and MPA-COOH–) were selected as the model mixture CdS/ZnS QDs.

Materials and methods

Reagents

Oleic acid-CdS/ZnS QDs, PEG-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs and MPA-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs were purchased from Xingshuo Co., Ltd. (China). These QDs have a fluorescence emission peak at 400–460 nm and a half-peak width of less than 25 nm. All other reagents in this study were analytical-grade reagents (A.R.) obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (China).

Cultivation of the model plant

The wheat seeds (Triticum acstivnm L.) and mangrove (Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong) hypocotyl were immersed into 10% H2O2 (v/v) and subsequently Milli-Q water three times. Then, the seeds were germinated on moist filter paper in a growth chamber (Safu Co. Ltd, China) under a light intensity of 200 μmol m−2 s−1 with a light cycle of 14/10 h (day/night) and constant temperature (298.15 ± 1 K). After 7 days, several mature plants with nearly the same heights were selected for further studies.

Establishing in situ determination of mixture CdS/ZnS QDs located on root epidermis

The mangrove (Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong) and wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum L.) were carefully cleaned with tap water, distilled water and Milli-Q water three times for approximately 10 min. After air drying, the plants were transferred into 500-mL beakers containing graded mixtures of the CdS/ZnS QD series [total concentrations (Ct): 30 μg/L, 60 μg/L, 90 μg/L, 120 μg/L and 300 μg/L] for 6 h. The residual concentrations of the CdS/ZnS QDs in aqueous solution (Cr) were determined using the synchronous fluorescence spectra methods (the detailed information of this method was presented in the experimental section of Additional file 1) [33], and the contents of CdS/ZnS QDs adsorbed onto the roots (Cs) were calculated by the equation Cs = Ct − Cr.

Then, the contaminated roots were placed under a nanosecond time-resolved spectrofluorimeter (Edinburgh FLS 980, UK) equipped with a 450 W Xe lamp. The experimental set-ups were similar to our previously reported [29]. Other key parameters are as follows: excitation wavelength, 390–410 nm; emission wavelength, 420–550 nm; delay time, 30 ns; light frequency, 40 MHz; and collection time, 5.00 s. All of the acquired excitation–emission fluorescence matrixes were processed under the Matlab environment. The N-way toolbox combined with the n-PLS algorithm, as previously described by Yang et al. [34], was used to split the fluorescence of the CdS/ZnS QD mixtures located on the root epidermis. Finally, the linear ranges, detection limits and relative standard deviations of the novel established method were acquired based on our previously reported methods [35].

The fate of the mixture CdS/ZnS QDs located on the epidermis of roots

After cleaning up the seedlings with Milli-Q water three times, nine groups of mangrove (Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong) and wheat (Triticum acstivnm L.) seedlings were immediately divided into two groups: with and without sterilized treatment. The in vitro-sterilized treatments were similar to those reported [36]. Briefly, the roots were sequentially immersed in 200 mL of 99% (v/v) ethanol for 1 min, 100 mL of 3.125% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite for 6 min, 200 mL of 99% (v/v) ethanol for 0.5 min and 500 mL of sterile reverse osmosis-treated (RO) water. Then, these two groups were transferred to 500-mL beakers containing 400 mL of full-strength Hoagland nutrient solution (pH = 5.5) with mixtures of CdS/ZnS QDs with three different surface coatings (oleic acid-CdS/ZnS QDs: 40 μg/L, PEG-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs: 100 μg/L, MPA-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs: 100 μg/L). Another two groups of mangrove (Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong) and wheat (Triticum acstivnm L.) seedlings contaminated with monocomponent CdS/ZnS QDs were selected as the control groups.

After the exposure procedures, the CdS/ZnS QDs located on the root epidermis were allowed to be transported and degraded for 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 16 h, 36 h, 72 h, 120 h and 168 h in aqueous solutions. At each sampling point, the CdS/ZnS QD concentrations were determined using the novel method established in our study. The experiments were conducted over a 7-day period at a day/night time (16/8) with day/night temperatures of 293.15 ± 1 K and 298.15 ± 1 K, respectively, and relative humidity of 60%.

Characterization of the mangrove and wheat roots

Prior to the analysis of the root characteristics, the root samples were fixed according to a previously reported method [35]. The procedures are briefly described as follows. First, approximately, 2 g of sample was immersed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in a 0.1 mmol/L phosphate buffer (pH = 7.2) for 8 h. Second, the sample was dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90% and 100%), and then, the solvent was replaced by t-butanol. Third, to acquire a new intact surface, the root samples were cut into slices using a sterile knife under liquid nitrogen conditions. Finally, the spatial arrangement of the functionalities and morphologies of the roots was obtained using a JXA-8230 field emission scanning electron microscope (JEOL, Japan) combined with an energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS).

To obtain the Cd content in the roots, the inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) method was used with some modification [37]. Briefly, root tissue below the liquid level was first dried at 60 ± 2 °C for 24 h. Then, the samples were microwave digested using 5 mL of HNO3 and 1 mL of H2O2 and then directly analyzed by ICP-MS (Thermo Fisher, ICAP-Qc).

Statistical analysis

All data presented in this study are the mean values of six replicates. The mean and standard deviation values of the replicates were calculated and compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests. All statistical analyses were run using SPSS version 19.0 software.

Results and discussion

Establishing an in situ method to determine the content of CdS/ZnS QDs located on root epidermis

Prior to establishing the in situ method, the standard emission fluorescence spectra of uncontaminated mangrove (Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong) and wheat (Triticum acstivnm L.) root epidermis samples were obtained and are presented in Additional file 1: Figure S1. Clearly, this technique is not suitable for determining the contents of CdS/ZnS QDs because of the presence of a strong autofluorescence signal from the roots and fluorescence signals from nontarget components. To reduce these interferences, as previously reported [38], the short lifetime fluorescence signal measurements were subtracted, and the signal/noise (S/N) rates increased about 7.06–19.11 times for CdS/ZnS QDs located on the mangrove (Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong) root epidermis at the optimal excitation/emission wavelength, which fit our requirements (Additional file 1: Table S1). Similar results were obtained for wheat (Triticum acstivnm L.) root samples. However, overlap still exists between the fluorescence spectra of the three kinds of CdS/ZnS QDs in the emission wavelength range of 420 nm–650 nm.

To validate the accuracy of the PARAFAC model, smaller data sets comprised of samples containing only one standard showed satisfactory data for these three CdS/ZnS QDs located on mangrove (Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong) root epidermis after deduction of the short lifetime fluorescence signal (< 10 ns, Additional file 1: Figure S2). Similar results were obtained for wheat (Triticum acstivnm L.) (Additional file 1: Figure S3). In addition, negligible fluctuations existed for the relative fluorescence intensity and optimal emission/excitation wavelength (Oleic acid-CdS/ZnS QDs, λex/λem = 398 nm/482 nm; PEG-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs, λex/λem = 345 nm/498 nm; MPA-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs, λex/λem = 368 nm/516 nm). The above results demonstrated that the PARAFAC technique can distinguish the fluorescence spectra of these three CdS/ZnS QDs in situ, even with strong spectral overlap (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Additionally, a value of R2 = 1 indicates that two spectra are exactly the same. In our study, high correlation coefficient (R2) values were obtained between the fluorescence spectra retrieved from the mixtures by the PARAFAC model and the fluorescence spectra of single CdS/ZnS QDs, and the results are listed in Table 1.
Table 1

Nanosecond time-resolved fluorescence spectra correlation coefficient (R2) for the three-way PARAFAC model

Plant

Oleic acid-CdS/ZnS QDs

PEG-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs

MPA-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs

Mangrove

0.9983

0.9947

0.9990

Wheat

0.9976

0.9932

0.9969

After applying the n-PLS algorithm, the relative concentration of CdS/ZnS QDs located on mangrove (Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong) root epidermis and its relationship with the practical concentration were determined with the correlation coefficients of 0.9987, 0.9978 and 0.9973 for the oleic acid-CdS/ZnS QDs, PEG-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs and MPA-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs, respectively (Fig. 1). For wheat (Triticum acstivnm L.), the correlation coefficients were 0.9966, 0.9969 and 0.9986 for oleic acid-CdS/ZnS QDs, PEG-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs and MPA-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs, respectively (Additional file 1: Figure S4). A three-factor model provided a %fit in the range of 98.39–99.31% and 98.25–99.53% and a core consistency in the ranges of 99.08–99.44% and 98.50–99.51% for mangrove (Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong) and wheat (Triticum acstivnm L.), respectively (Additional file 1: Table S2). Overall, the observations indicated that the reliability, sensitivity and selectivity meet the requirements for establishing an in situ CdS/ZnS QD determination method.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

The predicted concentration derived by n-PLS versus practical concentrations for a oleic acid-CdS/ZnS QDs, b PEG-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs and c MPA-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs located on mangrove (Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong) root epidermis

In situ investigation of the depuration fate of mixtures of CdS/ZnS QDs with different surface coatings on root epidermis

The dominant factors that determine their depuration fate in the rapid stage

The kinetic depuration of multicomponent CdS/ZnS QDs located on the root epidermis of mangrove (Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong) and wheat (Triticum acstivnm L.) was monitored over 7 days in the presence and absence of sterilization treatment using the established method, and the experimental results are presented in Fig. 2, Table 2 (rapid stages) and Table 3 (slow stages). The depuration of CdS/ZnS QDs clearly followed two stages: a rapid phase in the initial 8 h (Kr = (C0/Cr)/Δt) and a slower phase (Ks = (Cr/Cs)/Δt, where C0, Cr and Cs represent the remaining concentrations of CdS/ZnS QDs on the root epidermis at 0 h, 8 h and 7 days, respectively, and Δt represents the time duration of the corresponding processes) over the last 160 h. Zhou et al. determined that the desorption of ENMs from root surfaces and tissues can be considered negligible unless applying different metal ions, surfactants, complexing agents or ultrasonic techniques due to the strong adhesion force between ENMs and roots [39]. Thus, the main contributions to the dissipation of CdS/ZnS QDs on root epidermis are transportation and biodegradation processes.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

The depuration rates of mixtures of CdS/ZnS QDs located on mangrove (Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong) root epidermis with the sterilization treatment a oleic acid-CdS/ZnS QDs, b PEG-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs and c MPA-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs

Table 2

The concentrations of CdS/ZnS QDs located on root epidermis after the exposure of 8 h (rapid depuration stages)

Plant

QDs

C0 (ng g−1)

Sterilization treatment

Non-sterilization treatment

Cr (ng g−1)

Kr (h−1)

Cr (ng g−1)

Kr (h−1)

Mangrove

Oleic acid-CdS/ZnS QDs

355.6a ± 8.2b

131.9 ± 4.1

0.3851

133.8 ± 4.9

0.3796

PEG-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs

198.4 ± 4.0

87.8 ± 3.5

0.3228

90.2 ± 3.2

0.3142

MPA-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs

176.6 ± 3.9

86.5 ± 2.6

0.2917

84.4 ± 1.7

0.2989

Wheat

Oleic acid-CdS/ZnS QDs

289.7 ± 6.3

121.5 ± 8.1

0.3406

111.4 ± 5.9

0.3715

PEG-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs

155.2 ± 5.1

81.3 ± 4.6

0.2727

85.5 ± 2.6

0.2593

MPA-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs

167.8 ± 2.6

84.0 ± 1.3

0.2497

81.7 ± 2.5

0.2934

aMean values of the concentrations of CdS/ZnS QDs located on root epidermis of six groups

bStandard deviations of the concentrations of CdS/ZnS QDs located on root epidermis of six groups

Table 3

The concentrations of CdS/ZnS QDs located on root epidermis after the exposure of 7 days (slow depuration stages)

Plant

QDs

Sterilization treatment

Non-sterilization treatment

Cr (ng g−1)

Cs (ng g−1)

Ks (h−1)

Cr (ng g−1)

Cs (ng g−1)

Ks (h−1)

Mangrove

Oleic acid-CdS/ZnS QDs

131.9a ± 4.1b

88.5 ± 3.5

9.315 × 10−3

133.8 ± 4.9

85.2 ± 2.7

9.815 × 10−3

PEG-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs

87.8 ± 3.5

65.1 ± 1.9

8.429 × 10−3

90.2 ± 3.2

70.7 ± 1.9

7.974 × 10−3

MPA-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs

86.5 ± 2.6

68.5 ± 3.7

7.892 × 10−3

84.4 ± 1.7

64.4 ± 4.8

8.191 × 10−3

Wheat

Oleic acid-CdS/ZnS QDs

121.5 ± 8.1

80.5 ± 4.6

9.433 × 10−3

111.4 ± 5.9

75.4 ± 4.2

9.234 × 10−3

PEG-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs

81.3 ± 4.6

60.7 ± 2.9

8.371 × 10−3

85.5 ± 2.6

61.5 ± 3.6

8.689 × 10−3

MPA-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs

79.0 ± 1.3

59.6 ± 1.9

8.284 × 10−3

81.7 ± 2.5

63.8 ± 5.1

8.004 × 10−3

aMean values of the concentrations of CdS/ZnS QDs located on root epidermis of six groups

bStandard deviations of the concentrations of CdS/ZnS QDs located on root epidermis of six groups

In this study, the total Cd content in the root epidermis (Ccd) was considered as an indicator of the transportation rate of the CdS/ZnS QDs because biodegradation has no effect on Ccd values (Fig. 3). As Fig. 3 displays, in both the sterilizing and non-sterilizing treatment groups, the Ccd values on the mangrove (Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong) roots in the rapid stage slightly decreased from 393.9 to 346.7 ng g−1, 223.6 to 216.9 ng g−1 and 217.7 to 205.5 ng g−1 for the oleic acid-CdS/ZnS QDs, PEG-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs and MPA-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs, respectively (p > 0.05). Similar results were obtained for the wheat (Triticum acstivnm L.) root. These results indirectly indicated that biodegradation rather than transportation of CdS/ZnS QDs in roots may have a dominative effect on the clearance during the rapid phase. Furthermore, no obvious differences between the Kr values of the sterilizing and nonsterilizing treatment groups contaminated with mixtures of oleic acid-CdS/ZnS QDs, PEG-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs and MPA-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs were observed in the rapid depuration stage (Table 2, p < 0.05), which indicated that degradation did not originate from plant-associated rhizophytic bacteria [40, 41].
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

The content of Cd in mangrove (Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong) root after exposures of Oleic acid-CdS/ZnS QDs, PEG-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs and MPA-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs at the a rapid depuration stages (0–8 h) and b slow depuration stages (8 h–7 days)

Except for in vitro microbial degradation, Kwon et al. reported that metal-based QDs can be degraded in both intracellular and intercellular spaces of freshwater invertebrates (Daphnia magna) because QDs have small sizes that easily penetrate the cell membranes of protoplasts [42]. In contrast to animal cells, in general, the transportation and transformation of exotic substances (e.g., PAHs, PCBs, metal oxides nanoparticles and so on) in root cells can be ignored due to strong adsorption and absorption by cell walls [43, 44]. However, after exposure for 8 h, the fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) images displayed that the CdS/ZnS QDs formed large cluster in both the intracellular and intercellular space of root epidermis cell (Additional file 1: Figure S5) [the green and yellow colour represented the fluorescence signal of CdS/ZnS QDs (> 15 ns) and auto-fluorescence signal of root (< 10 ns) separately]. This result demonstrated that the degradations of metal-based QDs may happen in the intracellular and intercellular of root epidermis cell. The surface coating of metal-based QDs prevents nanoparticle degradation and ion leakage.

To better clarify the degradation mechanisms, we compared the differences in the Kr values between the single and mixture CdS/ZnS QDs located on the root epidermis. Interestingly, we found that obvious differences between the Kr values of these two groups were obtained for the PEG-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs and MPA-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs, while the oleic acid-CdS/ZnS QD exposure groups were not different (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the Kr values of the oleic acid-CdS/ZnS QDs located on mangrove (Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong) and wheat (Triticum acstivnm L.) root epidermis samples, i.e., 0.3851 h−1 and 0.3406 h−1, respectively, were much higher than those of PEG-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs and MPA-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs (Table 2, p < 0.05). These two results indicate that the reactions or strong molecular interactions (n–π, hydrogen bonds and so on) between PEG-COOH– and MPA-COOH– may improve the stability of these two CdS/ZnS QDs and affect the rapid degradation rate [45].

The dominant factors that determine their depuration fate in the slow stage

Two dissimilar results were found for the dissipation of the CdS/ZnS QD mixtures in the slow stage from 8 h to 7 days. In detail, (1) the depuration rates of the single-component CdS/ZnS QDs were much higher than those of the mixture QDs on the mangrove (Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong) root (p < 0.05, Additional file 1: Figure S6 and Fig. 2); (2) the Ccd contents of the oleic acid-CdS/ZnS QDs, PEG-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs and MPA-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs with the sterilization treatment on the mangrove (Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong) root significantly decreased from 346.7 to 167.7 ng g−1, 216.9 to 155.5 ng g−1 and 205.5 to 123.9 ng g−1, respectively (Fig. 3b). Similar results were obtained for wheat (Triticum acstivnm L.). Our data suggested that the mechanisms in the rapid dissipation stage of the CdS/ZnS QDs are not suitable for the slow stage, and thus, selective transportation processes may be involved in the depuration process.

To confirm our assumptions, after exposure for 7 days, FLIM was used to in situ track the migration of CdS/ZnS QDs in a mangrove (Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong) plant Yong root (Additional file 1: Figure S7) [46]. From the figures, it can be clearly concluded that a large number of blue spot were founded in both the divisional, elongation and root hair zones, which indicated that these three kinds of CdS/ZnS QDs transported and located on the above sections. Meanwhile, no detectable levels of CdS/ZnS QDs were observed in the cortex and vascular tissues. Therefore, longitudinal rather than radial movements participate in the slow depuration stage of CdS/ZnS QDs located on root epidermis. Similar results were also obtained for the wheat (Triticum acstivnm L.) plant.

As many reports have displayed, the rates of transportation of ENMs in plants are affected by two aspects: [4749] First, the chemical compositions of root epidermal cell wall, which consists of cellulose, lignin, hemicellulose and so on, acts as an effective sorption phase for ENM transport through intercellular pathways (apoplastic movement), and thus, the cell wall may be the first barrier for both spatial and vertical transportation of metal-based QDs [50]. Second, symplastic or endocytosis by membrane cell protoplasts is an another important pathway for nanomaterial transportation, especially for ENMs that mainly move through intracellular pathways [51, 52].

Therefore, to further explore the transportation mechanisms, the distributions of carbon (C), oxygen (O), nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) on the mangrove (Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong) and wheat (Triticum acstivnm L.) roots were first detected using a previously reported method [33]. The calculated polarity indexes ((O + N)/C) of the mangrove (Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong) and wheat (Triticum acstivnm L.) roots epidermis samples were 0.60 and 0.65, respectively (Table 4). Moreover, the Ks values of the oleic acid-CdS/ZnS QDs, which have relatively strong hydrophobic surface ligands, significantly and negatively correlated with the polarity index of the mangrove (Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong) (R2 = 0.9013, p < 0.05) and wheat (Triticum acstivnm L.) roots (R2 = 0.9046, p < 0.05). These findings revealed that apoplastic movement was the predominant movement form of the oleic acid-CdS/ZnS QDs, and thus, the interactions between the root epidermal cells and QDs limit the dissipation rate.
Table 4

The elemental composition of root epidermis and its relationships with the Ks values

Root

C (%)

O (%)

N (%)

S (%)

(O + N)/C

Oleic acid-CdS/ZnS QDsa

PEG-COOH-/MPA-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs

Ks (h−1)

R 2(b)

p c

Ks (h−1)

R 2

p

Mangrove

61.39

32.77

4.34

1.50

0.60

9.315 × 10−3

0.9013

0.032

8.429 × 10−3/8.371 × 10−3

0.2079/0.4442

0.831/0.704

Wheat

59.82

33.61

5.14

1.43

0.65

9.433 × 10−3

0.9346

0.040

7.892 × 10−3/8.284 × 10−3

0.3318/0.3695

0.902/0.721

aThe relationships between the polarity index ((O + N)/C) of root and the Ks values

bR2 represents the correlation coefficients

cp represents the significantly level, p < 0.05 indicates the correlation is significant

For the PEG-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs and MPA-COOH-CdS/ZnS QDs, no correlations were detected between their Ks values and polarity index for both the mangrove (Kandelia obovata (S., L.) Yong) and wheat (Triticum acstivnm L.) roots, revealing that the slow depuration step consisted of both degradation and transportation pathways. In addition, after exposure to QDs for a few days, as Li et al. reported [49], plants have a negative physiological response, including enhanced root/stem length, which changes the QD depuration rate on the root epidermis. However, the contributions of these three processes to the slow depuration step of these two QDs located on the root epidermis remain unclear. Additional work is required to address this scientific issue.

Practical application

As Additional file 1: Table S3 summarized, several typical analytical methods (including the electron microscopy, optical microscopy, ICP-MS and so on) have been widely used to investigate the distribution and location of metal-based nanoparticles in various types of plant. Unfortunately, the disadvantages made them unable to in situ explore the transportation and transformations of mixtures of metal-based QDs in plant tissues. Our established method has effectively overcome such drawbacks and realized our goals using the excitation–emission matrix combined with multi-way parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) and n-way partial least squares (n-PLS) approach.

Future applications and developments of the newly established method

It is important to note that the newly established method can be used in exploring various environmental behaviors of metal-based QDs in plants or their rhizosphere, not only the depuration of CdS/ZnS QDs in epidermis. For example, their highly sensitivity indicated that this method has the ability to explore the processes and mechanisms of trace content of metal-based QDs exchanged in sediment/water–root interface and air–leaf interface. Besides, due to the existences of spatial resolution capability, the transportation and transformations of metal-based QDs can also be explored in other plant tissues (xylem, phloem and so on).

More studies are needed to further improve the resolution of our established method. Specifically, the method has provided a new approach to in situ investigate the degradation, uptake and transportation of metal-based QDs in plant, especially in the horizontal direction. In other words, most of the processes that take place in the vertical direction cannot be easily explored by our established method due to the relative small z-direction spatial resolution. Fortunately, the super resolution fluorescence microscopy, as many report displayed [53, 54], allows the observation of plant tissues in vertical direction and images their three-dimensional (3D) structure. After combination with such techniques, therefore, our method will have the capability to overcome the drawbacks described above.

Conclusions

In this study, the experimental results showed that a combination of excitation–emission matrix and PARAFAC/n-PLS techniques provides a novel approach to accurately determine mixtures of metal-based QDs located on root epidermis. Then, the depuration of CdS/ZnS QDs on root epidermis was investigated by the established method, and depuration proceeded via a rapid phase and a slow phase. The intracellular and intercellular reactions of the surface coating determined the depuration rate of the CdS/ZnS QDs (Kr) during the rapid phase, while the polarity index ((O + N)/C) of the root epidermis may play an important role in limiting the Ks value of the oleic acid-CdS/ZnS QDs.

Notes

Abbreviations

QDs: 

quantum dots

ENMs: 

engineered nanomaterials

TPLCSM: 

two-photon laser confocal scanning fluorescence microscopy

NPs: 

nanoparticles (NPs)

PAA: 

polyacrylic acid

PEI: 

polyethylenimine

ICP-MS: 

inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry

NTFS: 

nanosecond time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy

PARAFAC: 

parallel factor analysis

n-PLS: 

n-way partial least squares

PAHs: 

polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

A.R.: 

analytical grade reagents

EDS: 

energy-dispersive spectrometer

ANOVA: 

analysis of variance ANOVA

S/N: 

signal/noise

FLIM: 

fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed on specific aspects of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 91428203, 21806026, 41673105 and 41273139), MEL Visiting Fellowship (MELRS1744) and the BaGui Scholars Program Foundation (2014).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Marine Sciences, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004, People’s Republic of China
(2)
Coral Reef Research Center of China, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004, People’s Republic of China
(3)
Guangxi Laboratory on the Study of Coral Reefs in the South China Sea, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004, People’s Republic of China

References

  1. Zhou W, Coleman JJ (2016) Semiconductor quantum dots. Curr Opin Solid St M 20(6):352–360View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Bundschuh M, Filser J, Luderwald S, McKee MS, Metreveli G, Schaumann GE, Schulz R, Wagner S (2018) Nanoparticles in the environment: where do we come from, where do we go to? Environ Sci Eur 30:6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Sun H, Nan Y, Feng R, Ma R (2018) Novel method for in situ investigation into graphene quantum dots effects on the adsorption of nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by crop leaf surfaces. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 162:10–16View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Kuhnel D, Marquardt C, Nau K, Krug HF, Mathes B, Steinbach C (2016) Environmental impacts of nanomaterials: providing comprehensive information on exposure, transport and ecotoxicity—the project DaNa2.0. Environ Sci Eur 26:21View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Wang D (2016) Biological effects, translocation, and metabolism of quantum dots in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Toxicol Res 5:1003–1011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhou C, Vitiello V, Pellegrini D, Wu C, Morelli E, Buttino I (2016) Toxicological effects of CdSe/ZnS quantum dots on marine planktonic organisms. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 123:26–31View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Poirier I, Pallud M, Kuhn L, Hammann P, Demortière A, Jamali A, Chicher J, Caplat C, Gallon RK, Bertrand M (2018) Toxicological effects of CdSe nanocrystals on the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum: the first mass spectrometry-based proteomic approach. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 152:78–90View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Pasquali F, Agrimonti C, Pagano L, Zappettini A, Villani M, Marmiroli M, White JC, Marmiroli N (2017) Nucleo-mitochondrial interaction of yeast in response to cadmium sulphide quantum dot exposure. J Hazard Mater 324:744–752View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Modlitbova P, Porizka P, Novotny K, Drbohlavova J, Chamradova I, Farka Z, Zlamalova-Gargosova H, Romih T, Kaiser J (2018) Short-term assessment of cadmium toxicity and uptake from different types of Cd-based quantum dots in the model plant Allium cepa L. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 153:23–31View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Awet TT, Kohl Y, Meier F, Straskraba S, Grun AL, Ruf T, Jost C, Drexel R, Tunc E, Emmerling C (2018) Effects of polystyrene nanoparticles on the microbiota and functional diversity of enzymes in soil. Environ Sci Eur 30:11View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Hund-Rinke K, Schlich K, Wenzel A (2010) TiO2 nanoparticles—relationship between dispersion preparation method and ecotoxicity in the algal growth test. Umweltwiss Schadst Forsch 22(5):517–528View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Schlich K, Klawonn T, Terytze K, Hund-Rinke K (2013) Hazard assessment of a silver nanoparticle in soil applied via sewage sludge. Environ Sci Eur 25:17View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Al-Salim N, Barraclough E, Burgess E, Clothier B, Deurer M, Green S, Malone L, Weir G (2011) Quantum dot transport in soil, plants, and insects. Sci Total Environ 409(17):3237–3248View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Das S, Wolfson BP, Tetard L, Tharkur J, Bazata J, Santra S (2015) Effect of N-acetyl cysteine coated CdS: Mn/ZnS quantum dots on seed germination and seedlings growth of snow pea (Pisum sativum L.): imaging and spectroscopic studies. Environ Sci Nano 2:203–212View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Koo Y, Wang J, Zhang Q, Zhu H, Wassim Chehab E, Colvin VL, Alvarez PJJ, Braam J (2015) Fluorescence reports intact quantum dot uptake into roots and translocation to leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana and subsequent ingestion by insect herbivores. Environ Sci Technol 49(1):626–632View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhang W, Ebbs SD, Musante C, White JC, Gao C, Ma X (2015) Uptake and accumulation of bulk and nanosized cerium oxide particles and ionic cerium by radish (Raphanus sativus L.). J Agric Food Chem 63(2):382–390View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Ma Y, Zhang P, Zhang Z, He X, Zhang J, Ding Y, Zhang J, Zheng L, Guo Z, Zhang L, Chai Z, Zhao Y (2015) Where does the transformation of precipitated ceria nanoparticles in hydroponic plant take place? Environ Sci Technol 49(17):10667–10674View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Montes A, Bisson MA, Gardella JA Jr, Aga DS (2017) Uptake and transformations of engineered nanomaterials: critical responses observed in terrestrial plants and the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Sci Total Environ 607–608:1497–1516View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. McKee MS, Filser J (2016) Impacts of metal-based engineered nanomaterials on soil communities. Environ Sci Nano 3:506–533View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim JH, Oh Y, Yoon H, Hwang I, Chang YS (2015) Iron nanoparticle-induced activation of plasma membrane H+-ATPase promotes stomatal opening in Arabidopsis thaliana. Environ Sci Technol 49(2):1113–1119View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Janicka M, Wdowikowska A, Klobus G (2017) In assay of plasma membrane H+-ATPase in plant tissues under abiotic stresses. In: Mock HP, Matros A, Witzel K (eds) Plant membrane proteomics. Methods in molecular biology, Vol 1696. New York, pp 205–215Google Scholar
  22. Yu X, Chen B, He M, Wang H, Hu B (2018) Chip-based magnetic solid phase microextraction coupled with ICP-MS for the determination of Cd and Se in HepG2 cells incubated with CdSe quantum dots. Talanta 179:279–284View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Sun H, Guo S, Nan Y, Ma H (2018) Direct determination of surfactant effects on the uptake of gaseous parent and alkylated PAHs by crop leaf surfaces. Ecotoxicol Environ 154:206–213View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Bendicho C, Bendicho-Lavilla C, Lavilla I (2016) Nanoparticle-assisted chemical speciation of trace elements. Trend Anal Chem 77:109–121View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang S, Li L, Jin S, Li W, Hang W, Yan X (2017) Rapid and quantitative measurement of single quantum dots in a sheath flow cuvette. Anal Chem 89(18):9857–9863View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang J, Li N, Shao F, Han H (2015) Microwave-assisted synthesis of high-quality CdTe/CdS@ZnS-SiO2 near-infrared-emitting quantum dots and their applications in Hg2+ sensing and imaging. Sensor Actuators B Chem 207:74–82View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Sousa JCL, Vivas MG, Ferrari JL, Mendonca CR, Schiavon MA (2014) Determination of particle size distribution of water soluble CdTe quantum dots by optical spectroscopy. RSC Adv 4(68):36024–36030View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Lewinski NA, Zhu H, Jo JH, Pham D, Kamath RR, Ouyang CR, Vulpe CD, Colvin VL, Drezek RA (2010) Quantification of water solubilised CdSe/ZnS quantum dots in Daphnia magna. Environ Sci Technol 44(5):1841–1846View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Li RL, Tan HD, Zhu YX, Zhang Y (2017) The retention and distribution of parent, alkylated, and N/O/S-containing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on the epidermal tissue of mangrove seedlings. Envion Pollut 226:135–142View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Li RL, Sun HF, Wang SP, Wang YH, Yu KF (2018) Retention of CdS/ZnS quantum dots (QDs) on the root epidermis of woody plant and its implications by benzo[a]pyrene: evidence from the in situ synchronous nanosecond time-resolved fluorescence spectra method. J Agric Food Chem 66(4):814–821View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Carabajal MD, Arancibia JA, Escandar GM (2017) Excitation–emission fluorescence-kinetic data obtained by Fenton degradation. Determination of heavy-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by four-way parallel factor analysis. Talanta 165:52–63View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Yang R, Zhao N, Xiao X, Yu S, Liu J, Liu W (2016) Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by four-way parallel factor analysis in presence of humic acid. Spectrochim Acta A 152:384–390View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Patra D, Ghaddar TH (2009) Application of synchronous fluorescence scan spectroscopy for size dependent simultaneous analysis of CdTe nanocrystals and their mixtures. Talanta 77(4):1549–1554View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Yang R, Zhao N, Xiao X, Yin G, Yu S, Liu J, Liu W (2016) Quantifying PAHs in water by three-way fluorescence spectra and second-order calibration methods. Opt Express 24(14):A1148–A1157View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Coombs JT, Franco CMM (2003) Isolation and identification of actinobacteria from surface-sterilized wheat roots. Appl Environ Microbiol 69(9):5603–5608View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Tan HD, Li RL, Zhu YX, Zhang Y (2017) In situ quantitative and visual investigation of the retention of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on the root surface of Kandelia obovata using a microscopic fluorescence spectral analysis method. Talanta 167:86–93View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Peng L, He M, Chen B, Qiao Y, Hu B (2015) Metallomics study of CdSe/ZnS quantum dots in HepG2 cells. ACS Nano 9(10):10324–10334View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Li R, Zhu Y, Zhang Y (2015) In situ investigation of the mechanisms of the transport to tissues of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons adsorbed onto the root surface of Kandelia obovata seedlings. Environ Pollut 201:100–106View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhou D, Jin S, Li L, Wang Y, Weng N (2011) Quantifying the adsorption and uptake of CuQ nanoparticles by wheat roots based on chemical extractions. J Environ Sci 23(11):1852–1857View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Khan S, Afzal M, Iqbal S, Khan QM (2013) Plant–bacteria partnerships for the remediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soils. Chemosphere 90(4):1317–1332View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Guo M, Gong Z, Miao R, Rookes J, Cahill D, Zhuang J (2017) Microbial mechanisms controlling the rhizosphere effect of ryegrass on degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in an aged-contaminated agricultural soil. Soil Biol Biochem 113:130–142View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Kwon D, Kim MJ, Park C, Park J, Choi K, Yoon TH (2012) In vivo biodegradation of colloidal quantum dots by a freshwater invertebrate, Daphnia magna. Aquat Toxicol 114–115:217–222Google Scholar
  43. Jiao XC, Xu FL, Dawson R, Chen SH, Tao S (2007) Adsorption and absorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to rice roots. Environ Pollut 148(1):230–235View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Galeone A, Vecchio G, Malvindi MA, Brunetti V, Cingolani R, Pompa PP (2012) In vivo assessment of CdSe–ZnS quantum dots: coating dependent bioaccumulation and genotoxicity. Nanoscale 4(20):6401–6407View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Zarco-Fernandez S, Coto-García AM, Munoz-Olivas R, Sanz-Landaluze J, Rainieri S, Camara C (2016) Bioaccumulation of ionic cadmium and cadmium selenide quantum dots in zebrafish larvae. Chemosphere 148:328–335View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Subashchandrabose SR, Krishnan K, Gratton E, Megharaj M, Naidu R (2014) Potential of fluorescence imaging techniques to monitor mutagenic PAH uptake by microalga. Environ Sci Technol 48(16):9152–9160View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Jaiganesh T, Rani JDV, Girigoswami A (2012) Spectroscopically characterized cadmium sulfide quantum dots lengthening the lag phase of Escherichia coli growth. Spectrochim Acta A 92:29–32View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Lin D, Tian X, Wu F, Xing B (2010) Fate and transport of engineered nanomaterials in the environment. J Environ Qual 39(6):1896–1908View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Li W, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Liu Z, Su W, Chen S, Liu Y, Zhuang J, Lei B (2016) Phytotoxicity, uptake, and translocation of fluorescent carbon dots in mung bean plants. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(31):19939–19945View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang J, Yang Y, Zhu H, Braam J, Schnoor JL, Alvarez PJJ (2014) Uptake, translocation, and transformation of quantum dots with cationic versus anionic coatings by Populus deltoides × nigra Cuttings. Environ Sci Technol 48(12):6754–6762View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Schwab F, Zhai G, Kern M, Turner A, Schnoor JL, Wiesner MR (2016) Barriers, pathways and processes for uptake, translocation and accumulation of nanomaterials in plants—critical review. Nanotoxicology 10(3):257–278Google Scholar
  52. Zhang D, Hua T, Xiao F, Chen C, Gersberg RM, Liu Y, Ng WJ, Tan SK (2014) Uptake and accumulation of CuO nanoparticles and CdS/ZnS quantum dot nanoparticles by Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani in hydroponic mesocosms. Ecol Eng 70:114–123View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Huang B, Bates M, Zhuang X (2011) Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. Annu Rev Biochem 78:993–1016View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Pujals S, Feiner-Gracia N, Delcanale P, Voets I, Albertazzi L (2019) Super-resolution microscopy as a powerful tool to study complex synthetic materials. Nat Rev Chem 3:68–84View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2019

Advertisement