Erratum to: Reply to the EFSA (2016) on the relevance of recent publications (Hofmann et al. 2014, 2016) on environmental risk assessment and management of Bt-maize events (MON810, Bt11 and 1507)
© The Author(s) 2017
Received: 9 March 2017
Accepted: 16 March 2017
Published: 26 April 2017
Erratum to: Environ Sci Eur (2017) 29:12 DOI 10.1186/s12302-017-0106-0
Upon publication of the original article , it was noticed that in the HTML version, two signs in the captions of Fig. 1 were the wrong way round.
The grey circle: should denote ‘leaf pollen density data Urtica close to the pollen source indicating the variability and used for calibration (n = 836 measurement data, scattered around 0.2 m distance for displaying the variability close to source).’
This has now been updated in the original HTML version of the article. This error arose due to our systems not processing the authors’ original correction request, therefore we, the publishers, apologise for this error and any inconvenience caused by it.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Kruse-Plass M, Hofmann F, Kuhn U, Otto M, Schlechtriemen U, Schröder B, Vögel R, Wosniok W (2014) Reply to the EFSA (2016) on the relevance of recent publications (Hofmann et al. 2014, 2016) on environmental risk assessment and management of Bt-maize events (MON810, Bt11 and 1507). Environ Sci Eur 2017(29):12. doi:10.1186/s12302-017-0106-0 Google Scholar