From: NORMAN guidance on suspect and non-target screening in environmental monitoring
Method | Domain | Advantages | (Potential) disadvantages |
---|---|---|---|
RPLC | Polar to non-polar | Straightforward, rather easy to understand separation | (very) hydrophilic compounds not retained Injection solvent mismatch |
MM–RPLC | Polar ionic to non-polar compounds | Expanding the RP compound domain towards ions | Neutral hydrophilic compounds not be well-retained More complex optimisation |
MM–HILIC | Very polar/hydrophilic and ionic | Complementary to RPLC | Hydrophobic compounds not retained More complex optimisation Solvent exchange required for aqueous samples |
HILIC | Very polar/hydrophilic | Complementary to RPLC | Solvent exchange required for aqueous samples Hydrophobic compounds not retained |
IC | Large range of ions, incl. inorganics | Broad domain of ionic compounds | Only for ionic compounds Removal of high salt load from eluents or samples necessary |
Capillary electrophoresis | Large range of ions, incl. inorganics | Broad domain of ionic compounds | Only for ionic compounds Low flow rates/injection volumes Often lower sensitivity as compared to LC |
SFC | Very hydrophilic to non-polar compounds | Green: less organic solvent consumption Likely rather versatile tuning of method possible | Additional hardware required Solvent exchange required for aqueous samples Elution not yet very predictable |
LCxLC | Depending on combination of columns | Combination of different separation strategies Very high peak capacity and selectivity | Additional hardware required Data size and high complexity for evaluation |