Skip to main content

Table 3 Substances identified as readily biodegradable and Persistent in water in the preliminary data set but excluded from the final data set and the rationale for the quality screen failure

From: Are ready biodegradation tests effective screens for non-persistence in all environmental compartments?

Substance

CAS (EC)

Reason for elimination from final data set

Phenol

108-95-2 (203-632-7)

The simulation study was incorrectly reported as a guideline simulation study. This study was designed to assess anaerobic biodegradation of several compounds, including phenol, under stringent conditions using secondary activated sludge. No half-life was derived

Sodium o-isobutyl dithiocarbonate

25,306-75-6 (246-805-2)

Sodium o-isopentyl dithiocarbonate

2540-36-5 (807-374-1)

For both substances, the simulation study was incorrectly reported as following a guideline for simulation test and refers to hydrolysis (abiotic degradation); hence, it is not truly a simulation test. The half-life of xanthates has been reported in literature as 2–8 days in water; therefore, these substances are most likely not Persistent [1]

2,2′-Iminodiethylamine

111-40-0 (203-865-4)

Test conducted in 1987 and incorrectly reported as a guideline simulation test. Limited details indicate it may have been a modified US EPA test method but no further details available to confirm