Skip to main content

Table 6 Multinomial logit model outcomes regarding support for UVAR adoption (ref. = Indifferent)

From: Preferences for policy measures to regulate urban vehicle access for climate change mitigation

Explanatory variables

Oppose

 

Support

 
 

Coefficient

S.E

Coefficient

S.E

Intercept

0.10

1.13

0.21

1.12

Age (ref. = 55 or older)

 18–34

0.12

0.47

1.19**

0.45

 35–44

− 0.43

0.50

0.62

0.46

 45–54

− 0.37

0.43

0.45

0.42

Gender (ref. = Male)

 Female

− 0.43

0.34

− 1.06**

0.32

Income (ref. = greater than 400, 000 Ft)

 less than 200, 000 Ft

1.075*

0.53

1.11*

0.51

 200, 000–400, 000 Ft

− 0.153

0.42

0.07

0.40

Commuting (ref. = Other)

 Private Car

1.87**

0.65

1.42*

0.62

 Public Transport

1.31*

0.56

1.18*

0.52

 Walking

1.42

0.82

1.94*

0.81

 Bicycle or scooter

1.54

0.83

1.47*

0.74

Planning cost (ref. = Strongly agree)

    

 Strongly disagree

− 0.01

0.79

0.76

0.71

 Disagree

0.33

0.62

0.53

0.57

 Neither agree nor disagree

0.22

0.54

− 0.67

0.52

 Agree

1.13**

0.43

0.54

0.40

Planning environment (ref. = Strongly agree)

    

 Strongly disagree

1.35

0.76

− 0.14

0.72

 Disagree

− 0.39

0.70

− 1.18

0.62

 Neither agree nor disagree

− 0.03

0.64

0.31

0.54

 Agree

0.42

0.56

− 0.59

0.47

Protest (ref. = Strongly agree)

 Strongly disagree

− 1.61

0.89

− 0.27

0.92

 Disagree

− 2.75**

0.91

− 1.22

0.92

 Neither agree nor disagree

− 2.25**

0.85

− 1.73

0.90

 Agree

− 0.40

0.93

− 2.11*

1.04

Problem perception

 Environment-related problems

− 0.19

0.20

0.49**

0.19

 Driving-related problems

0.43**

0.21

-0.36

0.18

Behavioural intention

 Reduce car usage

0.10

0.20

0.41*

0.19

 Change travel pattern

− 0.46**

0.18

− 0.07

0.18

 Modify car usage

− 0.35

0.18

0.11

0.18

Summary statistics

 AIC

749.980

   

 BIC

974.749

   

 McFadden R2

0.269

   
  1. *p < 0.05,
  2. **p < 0.01,
  3. ***p < 0.001