Skip to main content

Table 4 Proportion of micronuclei (MN) and binuclei (BN) in and EROD activity  ±  standard deviation (SD) in pmol/min/mg for caged (CF) and field-captured (FF) fish at the respective time points

From: Fish health in the Nidda as an indicator for ecosystem integrity: a case study for Central European small streams in densely populated areas

 

Sampling site

Species

Time point

MN (‰)

BN (‰)

EROD activity  ±  SD (pmol/min/mg)

n

CF monitoring

HC1

O. mykiss

Apr 16

0.194

0.361

1.140 ± 0.926

20

HC2

O. mykiss

Apr 16

0.500

0

0.687 ± 0.397a

19

N1

O. mykiss

Apr 16

0.429

0

0.481 ± 0.313a

15

N2

O. mykiss

Apr 16

0.472

0

0.246 ± 0.149b

18

N3

O. mykiss

Apr 16

0.361

0.083

0.531 ± 0.333a

17

N6

O. mykiss

Apr 16

0.500

0.107

0.424 ± 0.153ab

14

FF monitoring

N1

S. trutta f. fario

Jun 16

0.278c

0

1.512 ± 0.336a

10

N1

S. trutta f. fario

Sep 16

0

0

0.578 ± 0.270b

9

N2

S. trutta f. fario

Sep 16

0

0.444c

0.457 ± 0.360b

9

N2

L. cephalus

Jun 16

0.100

0

0.624 ± 0.456

10

N6

L. cephalus

Jun 16

0.222

0.056

0.541 ± 0.219

9

N6

L. cephalus

Sep 16

0.167

0.083

0.625 ± 0.326

10

N1

B. barbatula

Jun 16

0.111

0

0.097 ± 0.095

10

N1

B. barbatula

Sep 16

0.100

0

0.132 ± 0.051

9

N2

B. barbatula

Jun 16

0

0

0.108 ± 0.179

10

N2

B. barbatula

Sep 16

0.150

0.050

0.111 ± 0.068

10

N3

B. barbatula

Jun 16

0

0.050

0.199 ± 0.161

10

N3

B. barbatula

Sep 16

0

0.100

0.207 ± 0.099

10

N6

B. barbatula

Jun 16

0.250

0

0.147 ± 0.180

9

N6

B. barbatula

Sep 16

0.278

0

0.149 ± 0.118

9

  1. Significances are either marked by different letters (a,b,c)