Questions | Answer | Size of municipality | Tests results | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Up to 500 | 501–999 | 1000 –9999 | 10,000 –49,999 | 50,000 and more | Chi-squared p-value | Cramer V | ||
It is socially useful to award ‘green public contracts’, i.e., contracts that include an environmental criterion in the evaluation criteria | Absolutely disagree | 1.7 | 1.3 | 1 | 2.4 | 6.2 | 0.02983 | 0.07946 |
Somewhat disagree | 5.7 | 6.7 | 7.3 | 14.6 | 18.8 | |||
Do not know | 46.9 | 43.3 | 39.3 | 24.4 | 18.8 | |||
Somewhat agree | 37.5 | 41.2 | 44.3 | 46.3 | 31.2 | |||
Absolutely agree | 7.1 | 7.6 | 8 | 12.2 | 25 | |||
I am in favor of awarding public contracts that take into account the environmental criterion | Absolutely disagree | 1.5 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | 0.00141 | 0.09 |
Somewhat disagree | 3.6 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 4.9 | 18.8 | |||
Do not know | 39.3 | 40.8 | 28 | 22 | 25 | |||
Somewhat agree | 43.3 | 40.8 | 54 | 46.3 | 37.5 | |||
Absolutely agree | 12.3 | 13.9 | 14.7 | 26.8 | 18.8 | |||
Personally, I would prefer to announce a tender for a cheaper contract (without environmental requirements) before awarding a more expensive public contract with environmental characteristics | Absolutely disagree | 2.5 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 2.4 | 0 | 0.0015 | 0.09226 |
Somewhat disagree | 16.1 | 21.8 | 28.7 | 43.9 | 31.2 | |||
Do not know | 28.5 | 30.7 | 30 | 17.1 | 18.8 | |||
Somewhat agree | 41.4 | 35.7 | 32.3 | 29.3 | 43.8 | |||
Absolutely agree | 11.5 | 10.5 | 7.3 | 7.3 | 6.2 | |||
If I have information that a public contract with an environmental criterion increases the risk probability of an appeal to the Office for Protection of Competition, then I would clearly prefer a public contract without an environmental criterion | Absolutely disagree | 2.1 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 7.3 | 18.8 | < 0.00001 | 0.11412 |
Somewhat disagree | 7.7 | 5 | 10 | 19.5 | 6.2 | |||
Do not know | 31 | 21.4 | 23 | 9.8 | 6.2 | |||
Somewhat agree | 38.9 | 49.6 | 39.7 | 36.6 | 31.2 | |||
Absolutely agree | 20.3 | 22.7 | 25 | 26.8 | 37.5 | |||
If the contract has the following evaluation criteria: “employment”, “support for local companies”, and “ecological impact of public procurement on the environment”, then I will always (or usually) consider” ecological impact” to be the most important criterion of public procurement | Absolutely disagree | 3.4 | 2.5 | 2 | 7.3 | 6.2 | 0.09566 | 0.07287 |
Somewhat disagree | 22.8 | 26.9 | 29.3 | 31.7 | 37.5 | |||
Do not know | 29.9 | 28.6 | 35 | 31.7 | 25 | |||
Somewhat agree | 35.1 | 34.9 | 30 | 26.8 | 31.2 | |||
Absolutely agree | 8.8 | 7.1 | 3.7 | 2.4 | 0 | |||
If I want to include an environmental impact criterion in the contract, then I would classify it as a general obligation of the supplier under the contract | Absolutely disagree | 1 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 2.4 | 0 | 0.02966 | 0.07949 |
Somewhat disagree | 4.8 | 4.6 | 5.7 | 9.8 | 25 | |||
Do not know | 23.9 | 21 | 25.7 | 19.5 | 25 | |||
Somewhat agree | 56.7 | 54.6 | 59.3 | 58.5 | 43.8 | |||
Absolutely agree | 13.6 | 18.1 | 8.7 | 9.8 | 6.2 |