Skip to main content

Table 2 Effects of micro-dams in potato cropping and distinct strategies in maize cultivation on runoff quantities, erosion, plant protection product (PPP) loads and curve numbers (CN; means), as means with standard deviations, 10th percentiles, and ranges; n.a.: not applicable

From: Consideration of risk management practices in regulatory risk assessments: evaluation of field trials with micro-dams to reduce pesticide transport via surface runoff and soil erosion

 

Potatoes

Maize

Olivier et al. 29]

Goffart et al. [21]a,g

Aurbacher et al. [6]b

Areas [3]c

Areas [4]

CIPF [7]d,e

UCL [41]d,e

2009

2010

Runoff reduction

86% (± 14%)

10th pt.: 82% (47%–100%)

79% (± 19%),

10th pt.: 61% (53%–98%)

98%

81% (69%–93%)

84%

53% (± 24%)

36%, 70%

48% (± 6%)

52%, 44%

Runoff change

− 86% (± 7%), 10th percentile: − 80%

− 51% (± 9%), 10th percentile: − 45%

Erosion reduction

85% (± 35%)

10th pt.: 67% (0%–100%)

88% (± 17%)

10th pt.: 71% (58%–100%)

97%

n.a.

n.a.

67% (± 15%)

57%, 78%

76% (± 2%)

77%, 74%

Erosion change

− 90% (± 6%), 10th percentile: − 86%

− 71% (± 6%), 10th percentile: − 68%

PPP reductionf

n = 4, 91% (± 5%)

10th pt.: 86% (87%–96%)

n = 5, 84% (± 20%)

10th pt.: 62% (56%–100%)

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n = 4.50% (± 17%)

38%, 62%

n = 1.41% (± 7%),36%, 46%

PPP change

− 88% (± 4%), 10th percentile: − 85%

− 46% (± 12%), 10th percentile: − 39%

CN untreated

83

75

92

95

68

78

CN treated

73

39

73

78

67/64d

Mean: 65

75/73d

Mean: 74

→CN reduction

10 (12%)

36 (48%)

19 (21%)

17 (18%)

3 (4%)

4 (5%)

CN changeg

Mean CN untreated/treated: 86/66 (reduction: 21 ± 11; 10th percentile: 12)

(− 25% (± 16%), 10th percentile: − 14%)

− 5% (± 0.7%)

  1. a%-tal reductions in runoff, erosion and PPP reduction given as mean values of 5 trials over the 2 years
  2. bMean values over the 35 reported trials available only
  3. cRunoff was generated “delayed” in this trial, both CN and  %-tal runoff reduction based on the 2 measurements after 40 mm of artificial rain
  4. dTwo distinct techniques were applied: disc and drum plough
  5. eRunoff, erosion, and PPP reduction percentages: all evaluations are given as mean values over the distinct treatments
  6. fAverage reductions of the sums of PPP solved in runoff water and sorbed to the sediment; over all PPP applied
  7. gDue to the conceptual difference of one reported value for a complete season, CN from Goffart et al. [21] were not included here (see Additional file 1: Table S3 for details)