Potatoes | Maize | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Olivier et al. 29] | Goffart et al. [21]a,g | Aurbacher et al. [6]b | Areas [3]c | Areas [4] | CIPF [7]d,e | UCL [41]d,e | ||
2009 | 2010 | |||||||
Runoff reduction | 86% (± 14%) 10th pt.: 82% (47%–100%) | 79% (± 19%), 10th pt.: 61% (53%–98%) | 98% | 81% (69%–93%) | 84% | 53% (± 24%) 36%, 70% | 48% (± 6%) 52%, 44% | |
Runoff change | − 86% (± 7%), 10th percentile: − 80% | − 51% (± 9%), 10th percentile: − 45% | ||||||
Erosion reduction | 85% (± 35%) 10th pt.: 67% (0%–100%) | 88% (± 17%) 10th pt.: 71% (58%–100%) | 97% | n.a. | n.a. | 67% (± 15%) 57%, 78% | 76% (± 2%) 77%, 74% | |
Erosion change | − 90% (± 6%), 10th percentile: − 86% | − 71% (± 6%), 10th percentile: − 68% | ||||||
PPP reductionf | n = 4, 91% (± 5%) 10th pt.: 86% (87%–96%) | n = 5, 84% (± 20%) 10th pt.: 62% (56%–100%) | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n = 4.50% (± 17%) 38%, 62% | n = 1.41% (± 7%),36%, 46% | |
PPP change | − 88% (± 4%), 10th percentile: − 85% | − 46% (± 12%), 10th percentile: − 39% | ||||||
CN untreated | 83 | – | – | 75 | 92 | 95 | 68 | 78 |
CN treated | 73 | – | – | 39 | 73 | 78 | 67/64d Mean: 65 | 75/73d Mean: 74 |
→CN reduction | 10 (12%) | – | – | 36 (48%) | 19 (21%) | 17 (18%) | 3 (4%) | 4 (5%) |
CN changeg | Mean CN untreated/treated: 86/66 (reduction: 21 ± 11; 10th percentile: 12) (− 25% (± 16%), 10th percentile: − 14%) | − 5% (± 0.7%) |