Table 4 Simulated trap efficiencies of different case setups
DPM case number | Process A: settling | Process B: resuspension | Quantity of particles | CL for DRWM | Rebound resistance coefficient | Predicted trap efficiency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Yes | Yes | 22,400 | 0.15 | e = 1, f = 1 | 79.45 |
2 | Yes | Yes | 44,800 | 0.15 | e = 1, f = 1 | 81.81 |
3 | Yes | Yes | 67,200 | 0.15 | e = 1, f = 1 | 82.13 |
4 | Yes | Yes | 89,600 | 0.15 | e = 1, f = 1 | 82.20 |
5 | Yes | Yes | 100,800 | 0.15 | e = 1, f = 1 | 81.70 |
6 | Yes | Yes | 44,800 | 0.05 | e = 1, f = 1 | 87.85 |
7 | Yes | Yes | 44,800 | 0.25 | e = 1, f = 1 | 81.48 |
8 | Yes | Yes | 44,800 | 0.5 | e = 1, f = 1 | 82.00 |
9 | Yes | Yes | 44,800 | No DRWM | e = 1, f = 1 | 96.65 |
10 | Yes | Yes | 44,800 | 0.05 | e = 0.84−4.84τ*, f = 0.73 | 86.77 |
11 | Yes | Yes | 44,800 | 0.1 | e = 0.84–4.84τ*, f = 0.73 | 83.94 |
12 | Yes | No | 44,800 | 0.05 | e = 1, f = 1 | 92.77 |