Skip to main content

Table 6 Water samples, procedural controls: expected and measured EEQ

From: Estrogenic activity in drainage water: a field study on a Swiss cattle pasture

Sample

Procedural control processed with SPE

SPE processed vol. (l) (conc. factor)

Expected EEQ (ng/l)

EEQ (ER-CALUX) ± MU (ng/l)a

EEQ (YES) ± SD (ng/l)b

K1-0705

HPLC-grade water

0.991(1713 x)

0

<LOQ (0.016) (LOD 0.008)

n.d.

K2-0705

HPLC-grade water, spiked to 2 ng/l with E2

0.967(1672 x)

2

0.75 ± 0.195 (LOD 0.008)

1.72 ± 0.78

K3-0705

9:1 HPLC-grade water : acetone

0.350(601 x)

0

<LOQ (0.079) (LOD 0.008)

n.d.

K1-0306

HPLC-grade water

0.977(1656 x)

0

0.035 ± 0.009 (LOD 0.008)

n.d.

K2-0306

HPLC-grade water, spiked to 2 ng/l with E2

0.843(1425 x)

2

0.45 ± 0.117 (LOD 0.008)

1.81 ± 0.15

K1-0107

HPLC-grade water, spiked to 2 ng/l with E2

0.838(1425 x)

2

1.3 ± 0.338 (LOD 0.008)

1.91 ± 0.05

K1-0809

HPLC-grade water, spiked to 10 ng/l with E2

0.992(1993 x)

10

5.5 ± 1.43 (LOD 0.013)

20.1 ± 0.7

K2-0809

HPLC-grade water, spiked to 2 ng/l with E2

0.996(1996 x)

2

0.77 ± 0.2 (LOD 0.013)

2.83 ± 0.18

K3-0809

HPLC-grade water, spiked to 2 ng/l with E2

0.995(2003 x)

2

0.8 ± 0.208 (LOD 0.013)

1.42 ± 0.1

  1. MU measurement uncertainty, 26 %, SD standard deviation, n.d. not detectable
  2. aData as reported by BDS
  3. bData as reported by Ecotox Centre