From: Identifying criteria for effective urban vehicle access regulations adoption
Dimension | Criteria | Range | Median | IQR |
---|---|---|---|---|
Economic | Revenue | 1–5 | 3 | 1 |
Capital cost | 2–5 | 4 | 1 | |
Operating cost | 2–5 | 4 | 0 | |
Travel cost | 2–5 | 4 | 1 | |
Impact on SMEs | 1–5 | 3 | 1.5 | |
Environment | Fossil fuel consumption | 2–5 | 4 | 0.5 |
Air pollution | 3 | 5 | 1 | |
Noise annoyance | 2–5 | 4 | 1 | |
Greenhouse gas emissions | 2–5 | 4 | 1 | |
Impact on biodiversity | 1–5 | 3 | 1 | |
Social | Public acceptability | 2–5 | 4 | 1 |
Equity and social inclusion | 2–5 | 4 | 1 | |
Accessibility | 3–5 | 5 | 1 | |
Congestion reduction | 2–5 | 4 | 1 | |
Impact on land use | 2–5 | 4 | 1.5 | |
Modal shift | 3–5 | 4 | 1 | |
Safety | 2–5 | 4 | 1 | |
Technical | Public transport quality | 2–5 | 4 | 1 |
Institutional capacity | 2–5 | 4 | 1 | |
Marketing and communication | 2–5 | 4 | 1 | |
Availability of P + R facilities | 1–5 | 3 | 1 | |
Robust cycling network | 2–5 | 4 | 1 | |
Mobility as a service deployment | 1–5 | 4 | 1 |