Skip to main content

Table 1 Environmental risk assessment of the detected pesticides following the worst-case scenario

From: Spatiotemporal analysis of multi-pesticide residues in the largest Central European shallow lake, Lake Balaton, and its sub-catchment area

Detected compound

Number of positive hits

Frequency of occurrence (FO) [%]

AA-EQS [µg/L]

mean MEC [µg/L] / water body

MAC-EQS [µg/L]

maximum MEC [µg/L]

PNEC (present in literature) [µg/L]

Critical toxicity endpoint of aquatic organisms

RQ max

Level of risk

Endrin†

1

0.5

0.011

0.0006

n. a

0.009

1.22E-08a

acute crustacean LC50

7.38E + 05

High

Metolachlor*

26

12.8

–

–

–

0.11

0.001b

chronic algae 96/72 h NOEC

110

4,4′-DDEM†

1

0.5

0.0252

0.0005

n. a

0.019

0.0007c

acute crustacean LC50

27.1

Thiabendazole

5

2.5

–

–

–

0.25

0.012b

chronic fish 21 d NOEC

20.8

Carbendazim†

1

0.5

–

–

–

0.03

0.0015b

chronic invertebrate 96/72 h NOEC

20.0

Imazalil

1

0.5

–

–

–

0.2

0.015b

chronic invertebrate 96/72 h NOEC

13.3

Azoxystrobin

6

3.0

–

–

–

0.03

0.0026d

chronic invertebrate 21 d NOEL

11.5

Tebuconazole

14

6.9

–

–

–

0.06

0.01b

chronic invertebrate 96/72 h NOEC

6.0

Glyphosate

9

4.4

–4

–

–4

2.0

0.355 l

chronic algae 32 d NOEL

5.6

Atrazine†

17

8.4

0.6

0.016, 0.057, 0.0053

2.0

0.45

0.1b

chronic algae 96/72 h NOEC

4.5

Imidacloprid

8

3.9

–

–

–

0.04

0.009f

HC5 from chronic SSD

4.4

Desethyl-atrazineM†

31

15.3

–

–

–

0.28

0.1d

acute algae 12 d EC50 growth

2.8

Terbuthylazine

74

36.5

–

–

–

0.16

0.06d

chronic algae 5 d NOEL

2.7

4,4′-DDT†

1

0.5

0.013

0.0004

n. a

0.021

0.0098c

acute crustacean LC50

2.1

Propoxur†

4

2.0

–

–

–

0.02

0.01d

acute invertebrate 48 h LC50

2.0

4,4′-DDDM†

1

0.5

0.025 2

0.0005

n. a

0.018

0.0129 g

acute crustacean LC50

1.4

Metribuzin

1

0.5

–

–

–

0.04

0.044 l

chronic algae 96 h NOEC

1.1

Linuron†

2

1.0

–

–

–

0.06

0.06 d

chronic algae 72 h EC50

1.0

Dinoseb†

1

0.5

–

–

-

0.02

0.028 h

acute fish 96 h LC50

0.7

Medium

Terbutryn†

1

0.5

0.065

0.0067

0.34

0.02

0.028b

chronic algae 96/72 h NOEC

0.7

Sebuthylazine†

3

1.5

–

–

–

0.02

0.03e

provisional

0.7

Acetamiprid

2

1.0

–

–

–

0.31

0.6d

acute insect 48 h NOEL mortality

0.5

Chlorotoluron

2

1.0

–

–

–

0.05

0.1d

chronic algae 96 h NOEC

0.5

Bentazone

17

8.4

– 4

–

– 4

0.11

0.285 l

chronic algae 7 d NOEC

0.4

Diuron†

3

1.5

0.2

0.0083, 0.006

1.8

0.02

0.046d

chronic algae 96 h NOEC

0.4

Dimethenamide

2

1.0

–

–

-–

0.07

0.2d

plant 14 d NOEL

0.4

DEET

71

35

–

–

–

1.57

5.21j

chronic algae 96/72 h NOEC

0.4

Dimoxystrobin

2

1

–

–

–

0.01

0.032 k

chronic fish 97 d NOEC

0.3

Cycloate†

1

0.5

–

–

–

0.21

0.7899c

acute crustacean LC50

0.3

Fluazinam

1

0.5

–

–

–

0.02

0.1 m

acute fish 96 h LC50

0.2

Fludioxonil

1

0.5

–

–

–

0.01

0.0466i

chronic algae 96 h, NOEL

0.2

Isoproturon†

1

0.5

0.3

0.0053

1.0

0.01

0.052b

chronic algae 96/72 h NOEC

0.2

Metazachlor

2

1.0

–

–

–

0.02

0.162d

acute algae 72 h EC50

0.1

α-chlordane†

1

0.5

–

–

–

0.009

0.09n

acute fish 96 h LC50

0.1

Ƴ-chlordane†

1

0.5

–

–

–

0.008

Butylate†

10

4.9

–

–

–

0.13

1.88°

acute algae 96 h EC50

0.07

Low

Myclobutanil

1

0.5

–

–

–

0.08

1.1c

acute crustacean LC50

0.07

Dichlorprop

2

1.0

–

–

–

0.03

0.5 l

acute fish 96 h EC50

0.06

Disulfoton sulfoxideM†

1

0.5

–

–

–

0.01

0.2 l (disulfoton)

chronic invertebrate 4 d LC50

0.05

AMPAM

21

10.5

– 3

–

– 3

3.0

80p

provisional

0.04

Dimethomorph

1

0.5

–

–

–

0.02

0.5q

acute invertebrate NOEC

0.04

Metalaxyl

2

1.0

–

–

–

0.3

8.03c

acute crustacean LC50

0.04

Propiconazole

11

5.4

–

–

–

0.05

1.36d

chronic fish 21 d NOEC

0.04

Cyproconazole

12

5.9

–

–

–

0.02

0.6d

chronic algae 120 h NOEL

0.03

MCPA

2

1.0

–

–

–

0.03

1.4d

chronic plant 14 d NOEL

0.02

Nicosulfuron

4

2.0

–

–

–

0.03

1.43i

acute algae 96 h EC50

0.02

2,4-D

6

3.0

–

–

–

0.04

2.7i

acute algae 7d EC50

0.015

Simazine†

1

0.5

1.0

0.0056

4.0

0.01

0.7b

chronic fish 21 d NOEC

0.014

Thionazin†

1

0.5

–

–

–

0.06

5 l

chronic algae 96 h NOEC

0.012

Boscalid

7

3.4

–

–

–

0.02

2.32d

chronic fish 97 d NOEC

0.008

Penconazole

2

1.0

–

–

–

0.05

6r

not known

0.008

Mecoprop

1

0.5

– 4

–

– 4

0.01

6p

provisional

0.001

Fenuron†

1

0.5

–

–

–

0.01

7 l

chronic algae 10 d EC10

0.0001

  1. Ecotoxicological data and the predicted no-effect concentrations (PNECs) were collected from the literature or calculated using databases [EnviroTox, PPDB] as described in the methods (indicated in the superscript). The maximal Risk Quotient (RQ max) values were calculated and characterized the level of risk. Insecticide and repellent residues are in bold and italics, herbicide residues are in bold, fungicide residues are in italics
  2. FO% frequency of occurrence, AA-EQS annual average environmental quality standard, MAC-EQS maximum allowable concentration environmental quality standard (according to the 2013/39/EC), mean MEC calculated average concentration values (according to 2009/90/EC), maximum MEC—maximum measured environmental concentration for each compound. n. a. not applicable, EQS—not listed as a priority substance in the field of water policy according to Directive 2013/39/EC
  3. †the banned pesticide residues in Hungary during the investigation period. *sum of the enantiomer/isomer composition of metolachlor. Ma metabolite of the active substance of pesticide
  4. a[39]; b[9]; c[40]; d[33]; e[41]; f[42]; g[43]; h[44]; i[36]; j[45]; k[46]; l[37]; m[47]; n[32].; o[48]; p[49]; q[14]; r[50].
  5. 1the sum of cyclodiene pesticides; 2DDT total comprises the sum of the isomers; 3this substance is not a priority substance but one of the other pollutants for which the EQS are identical to those laid down in the legislation that applied before 13 January 2009. 4possible identification as priority substances or priority hazardous substances according to Directive 2008/105/EC [38]