Case studies | Infrastructure | Investment | New technologies | Main impacts |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Technological, regulatory, social, environmental and institutional | Initially very high as new technologies and grid infrastructure need to be developed | √ | Socioeconomic, regulatory, policy, and environmental |
2 | Technological institutional, and regulatory | Initially low as research needs to establish metrics | √ | Socioeconomic, policy, and environmental |
3 | Visual/landscape, environmental, socioeconomic, and procedural | Initially medium–low because its implementation by issues is gradual | √ | Socioeconomic, regulatory, policy, and environmental |
4 | Technological, social, institutional and political | Initially medium because developing metrics is gradual | √ | Socioeconomic, and policy |
5 | Technological, social, institutional and political | Initially low because its hybridisation with traditional systems | √ | Social and economic |
6 | Technological, social, environmental, institutional and political | Initially medium–low because its implementation by issues is gradual | √ | Social, economic and environmental |
7 | Technological, social and environmental | Initially medium–high because the regions need public resources due to social disadvantage | √ | Social, economic and environmental |
8 | Social and political | Low because it does not refer to the cost of each project | √ | Social (focused in territorial and human) |
9 | Social, institutional, political | Initially medium–low because its implementation is in line with local legal frameworks | Social and political | |
10 | Social, environmental | Low, since the most important tool is raising awareness among food consumers | Social and economic | |
11 | Technological, environmental and institutional | Initially very high as new technologies need to be supported by expensive research | √ | Technological and economic |