Skip to main content
Environmental Sciences Europe

Table 3 The stakeholder group’s comment contribution per nano-specific PEG, given as a percentage (%) of the total amount of comments provided by the PEG

From: Who are engaging in the nano-specific partner expert groups? An analysis of partner expert groups vs. expert groups

Stakeholder group

Overall

Reg. and Sub. ID1

Reg.2

IR&CSA env3

IR&CSA QSARs4

IR&CSA Human5

MSCA

~ 34

~ 32

~ 35

~ 44

~ 34

~ 29

EUB

~ 29

~ 24

~ 29

~ 19

~ 37

~ 36

I&Ts

~ 27

~ 37

~ 30

~ 25

~ 17

~ 19

NGOs

~ 5

~ 2

~ 3

~ 5

~ 5

~ 10

Other

~ 5

~ 5

~ 4

~ 8

~ 5

~ 6

  1. The numbers are rounded values
  2. 1PEG for consultation on the update of the Guidance on Registration and Guidance on Substance ID
  3. 2PEG for the update of the Guidance on registration regarding “recommendations for nanomaterials”
  4. 3PEG on the update of Chapters R.7a, R.7b and R.7c of the Guidance on IR&CSA on “recommendations for nanomaterials” covering environmental endpoints
  5. 4PEG on the update of Chapter R.6 of the Guidance on IR&CSA on “recommendations for nanomaterials” regarding QSARs and grouping of chemicals
  6. 5PEG on the update of Chapters R.7a and R.7c of the Guidance on IR&CSA on “recommendations for nanomaterials” regarding human health endpoints
Back to article page