Skip to main content

Table 4 MetFrag Score breakdown for the top candidates of four m/z

From: Retrospective non-target analysis to support regulatory water monitoring: from masses of interest to recommendations via in silico workflows

 

MetFrag Score (weighted)

7.00

4.63

2.95

2.50

MetFrag Score distribution classification

High

(> 6)

Moderate

(3–6)

Moderate

(~ 3–6; borderline)

Low (< 3)

Scenario

Scenario 1—high Spectral and Metadata scores

2—low Spectral and High Metadata scores

3—high Spectral and Low Metadata scores

4—low Spectral and Metadata scores

m/z

278.1062

187.0938

152.0198

199.1050

MetFrag Score breakdown (top candidate only)

 Spectral terms (raw scores)

 FragmenterScore

95.30

7.88

217.84

19.48

 OfflineMetFusion

4.64

0.88

2.06

2.81

 OfflineIndivMoNA

1.00

0

0

0

Metadata terms (raw scores)

 CPDAT_COUNT

0

0

0

0

 DATA_SOURCES

47

42

1

1

 KEMIMARKET_EXPO

16

11

0

0

 KEMIMARKET_HAZ

9

2

0

0

 NORMANSUSDAT

1

1

0

0

 REACH2017

1

1

0

0

 INDACT

0

0

0

0

  1. Each MetFrag Score here represents one of the four scenarios in Table 3