Skip to main content

Table 26 Comparison of insignificance threshold values for the metal concentration in leachate [65] with the critical total concentrations in leachate used in this study

From: Assessing the relevance of atmospheric heavy metal deposition with regard to ecosystem integrity and human health in Germany

 

Critical concentration used

Insignificance thresholdse

Ecosystem protection

Drinking water protectionh

Ecosystem and drinking water protection

 

µg l−1

 

µg l−1

As

PNECi

70a

10

Base valuef

3.2

Cr(III)

NOECj

44b

50

Ecotoxicological impact thresholdf

3.4

Cu

PNEC

1-50c

2000

Base valueg

5.4

Ni

NOEC

25-700c

–

Base valueg

7

Zn

NOEC

20-90c

–

Base valueg

60

Pb

NOEC

0.08-71.5c

10

Ecotoxicological impact thresholdf

1.2

Cd

NOEC

0.43–7.16c

3

Base valueg

0.3

Hg

NOEC

0.058–17.4c

1

Base valueg

0.1

  1. aDoyle et al. [50] in Reinds et al. [33]
  2. bCrommentuijn et al. [96] in Reinds et al. [33]
  3. cWHAM modeling results [97]
  4. dReinds et al. [33]
  5. eZeddel et al. [65]
  6. fEcotoxicological impact threshold < human toxicological impact threshold
  7. gThe lower value based on ecotoxicity was below the base value, so that the JRC is reported at the level of the base value
  8. hDrinking Water Ordinance for Germany [38]
  9. iPredicted no-effect concentration = the predicted concentration of a substance that is normally dangerous to the environment and up to which no effects on the environment are observed
  10. jNo Observed Effect Concentration = corresponds to the highest exposure concentration of a substance in subchronic or chronic studies at which no statistically significant effect can be observed