Skip to main content

Table 5 Analysis of the associations between MN frequency and exposure levels exceeded the thresholds established in both the EU Ambient Air Quality Directive and the WHO Air Quality Guidelines

From: Results from the European Union MAPEC_LIFE cohort study on air pollution and chromosomal damage in children: are public health policies sufficiently protective?

Air pollutant

Type of limit

Limit value

<EU/WHO limit

>EU/WHO limit

IRR (95% CIs)

N

MN/1000 mean ± SD

N

MN/1000 mean ± SD

PM10

EU daily

50 µg/m3

1946

0.33 ± 0.49

193

0.40 ± 0.46

1.011 (0.811, 1.262)

WHO daily

50 µg/m3

1946

0.33 ± 0.49

193

0.40 ± 0.46

1.011(0.811, 1.262)

EU annual

40 µg/m3

1700

0.30 ± 0.45

439

0.46 ± 0.58

1.179*

(1.006, 1.381)

WHO annual

20 µg/m3

590

0.26 ± 0.42

1529

0.36 ± 0.50

1.225* (1.039, 1.443)

PM2.5

EU annual

25 µg/m3

1579

0.31 ± 0.45

419

0.46 ± 0.59

1.099 (0.915, 1.320)

WHO annual

10 µg/m3

307

0.23 ± 0.34

1691

0.36 ± 0.51

1.125 (0.916, 1.382)

WHO daily

25 µg/m3

1579

0.31 ± 0.45

419

0.46 ± 0.59

1.099 (0.915, 1.320)

Benzene

EU annual

5 µg/m3

1772

0.33 ± 0.47

33

0.26 ± 0.36

0.818 (0.472, 1.418)

WHO annuala

1.7 µg/m3

1438

0.30 ± 0.45

367

0.41 ± 0.54

1.278* (1.038, 1.573)

NO2

EU annual

40 µg/m3

1435

0.33 ± 0.49

704

0.34 ± 0.48

0.782 (0.665, 0.921)

WHO annual

40 µg/m3

1435

0.33 ± 0.49

704

0.34 ± 0.48

0.782 (0.665, 0.921)

BaPb

EU annual

1 ng/m3

1868

0.31 ± 0.46

166

0.51 ± 0.59

1.145 (0.900, 1.457)

WHO annuala

0.12 ng/m3

1146

0.24 ± 0.36

888

0.44 ± 0.57

1.598** (1.210, 2.111)

  1. All the associations were assessed including town of residence, temperature, child BMI and adherence to Mediterranean diet, exposure to second-hand smoke at home, having graduated mother and father in the model as potential confounders
  2. Number of biological samples (N) and mean MN frequency ± SD (MN/1000) are reported for children exposed to levels lower (<) or higher (>) than the limits. Associations were assessed by computing Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) with a Poisson regression model
  3. *, **p value < 0.05, < 0.01, respectively, assessed by Poison regression mixed model
  4. aBaP concentration detected on PM0.5 samples collected near schools
  5. bEstimated Reference Levels (RL)