Skip to main content

Table 2 Effect of tillage methods and rice varieties on nutrient content of rice tissues

From: Effects of no-till and rice varieties on nitrogen and phosphorus balance in rice fields

Rice tissues

Time

Treatment

Total C

Total N

Total P

g kg−1

Straw

2016.10

NTJ

376.84 ± 3.18b

8.11 ± 0.51a

1.10 ± 0.28b

NTG

384.85 ± 1.44a

8.20 ± 0.88a

1.22 ± 0.35a

CTJ

378.95 ± 4.64b

8.07 ± 0.02a

1.03 ± 0.25b

CTG

388.83 ± 0.18a

8.16 ± 0.40a

1.08 ± 0.08b

2017.10

NTJ

386.51 ± 0.84c

8.21 ± 0.48a

1.12 ± 0.26ab

NTG

397.90 ± 3.65a

8.31 ± 0.67a

1.25 ± 0.14a

CTJ

391.07 ± 0.62b

8.14 ± 0.51a

1.06 ± 0.09b

CTG

402.11 ± 2.43a

8.27 ± 0.64a

1.10 ± 0.36ab

Grain

2016.10

NTJ

419.65 ± 1.12ab

12.25 ± 0.84b

2.11 ± 0.28b

NTG

422.18 ± 0.91a

13.06 ± 0.22a

2.35 ± 0.12a

CTJ

418.25 ± 0.47b

12.23 ± 0.21b

2.19 ± 0.10b

CTG

420.03 ± 0.72ab

12.54 ± 0.02ab

2.25 ± 0.01ab

2017.10

NTJ

420.80 ± 1.93a

12.34 ± 0.24b

2.15 ± 0.02b

NTG

423.71 ± 1.48a

13.48 ± 0.02a

2.38 ± 0.01a

CTJ

418.85 ± 1.47a

12.28 ± 0.12b

2.21 ± 0.01b

CTG

421.76 ± 1.39a

12.65 ± 0.01b

2.28 ± 0.03ab

  1. NTJ, NTG, CTJ, CTG indicate no-till/japonica rice, no-till/glutinous rice, conventional tillage/japonica rice, conventional tillage/glutinous rice, respectively. Different lowercase letters in each column indicate significant differences set at p = 0.05 level