Skip to main content

Table 5 Summary of QSPR-predicted values used in comparison with slow-stirring log Kow/D values for each surfactant tested

From: A comparison of log Kow (n-octanol–water partition coefficient) values for non-ionic, anionic, cationic and amphoteric surfactants determined using predictions and experimental methods

Log Kow method

Non-ionic

Anionicd

Cationicd

Amphotericd

C8

EO4

C12

EO4

C12

EO8

C12

AS

C12E4S

C12 Carb

C12 TMAC

C16 TMAC

C18 BAC

C12–16 ADBa

C12

AAPB

C12 DAO

Slow-stirring

2.64

4.33

3.96

1.92

1.47

3.15

0.68

1.83

1.32

3.69

2.59

0.71

KOWWIN

1.71

3.67

2.57

2.42

1.32

5.00

1.22

3.18

5.87

0.88

1.31

4.67

CLOGP

2.43

4.55

3.84

4.52

4.15

1.10

0.56

2.68

6.36

− 2.13

− 2.30

3.20

Molinspiration

2.42

4.40

3.62

1.78

1.06

2.32

1.84

3.87

6.47

− 0.97

− 2.25

3.27

H & L

2.77

4.93

4.53

1.60

2.27

1.10

2.14

4.30

5.77

NA

NA

NA

ALOGP

2.27

4.10

3.57

2.17

1.64

3.10

1.27

3.09

5.59

2.32

1.00

4.50

ACD Labs

1.85

3.97

2.54

5.40

4.33

5.03

0.67b

2.40b

4.28b

0.66

0.32

3.27

Crippen F.

2.02

3.68

3.06

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Viswanadhan’s F.

1.87

3.45

2.79

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Broto

2.51

4.33

4.00

3.46

3.13

4.49

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

SPARC

3.50

5.50

6.45

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Mean QSPR log Kow

2.39

4.26

3.70

3.05

2.56

3.16

1.28

3.25

5.72

0.15

− 0.38

3.78

Mean differencec

− 0.31

− 0.07

− 0.26

1.13

1.09

0.01

0.60

1.42

4.40

− 3.57

− 2.97

3.07

  1. NA not applicable. Method unavailable to generate a value for comparison
  2. aBased on weighted average for chain length distribution
  3. bPredicted value does not include counter ion in SMILES
  4. cDifference between QSPR prediction mean and slow-stirring result
  5. dValues used from ionised SMILES notations for direct comparison
  6. Experimental slow stirring data are presented in italics in order to distinguish them from other QSPR predicted data