From: How to consider engineered nanomaterials in major accident regulations?
 | Rule | Advantage | Disadvantage |
---|---|---|---|
1 | All ENM have the same (eco)toxicity as larger particles with the same composition. Some specific ENM are placed in the exemption list | Simple rule; recognizes the higher risk potential of certain ENM | Insufficient data to select exemptions |
2 | Each manufacturer has to provide specific (eco)toxicological tests for each ENM, independent of the chemical composition of the ENM | The nano-aspect as well as the different properties of various ENM are considered | Problem of definition of ENM; expensive for companies that produce only small amounts or small variations of materials |
3 | Dispersions are classified like normal chemicals; for powders, a nano-specific regulation is implemented in addition to existing regulations for powders | The different risk of dispersions and powders is accommodated. Simple to define | Possible exemptions need to be formulated (see 1) |
4 | For ENM in powder form, the mass threshold is reduced by a factor of 10 to accommodate the higher surface area | The precautionary principle and the increased surface area of the nanoparticles are considered | Relatively unspecific |
5 | ENM are categorized (e.g., soluble/insoluble, metal oxides/metals/organic ENM) and assessed differently | Differences between particle types are considered | Material-specific properties are over-represented; many exemptions |