Evaluation method | Evaluation criteria/question | Type of criteria/mark | Summary of evaluation results |
---|---|---|---|
Durda and Preziosi | Control media identical to test media in all respect except the treatment variable. | Mandatory | Not stated in any of these studies, controls not stated at all in two studies. |
Control and test organism drawn from same population. | Mandatory | Not stated in any of these studies, controls not stated at all in two studies. | |
Acceptable control mortality/morbidity (approx. 10%). | Mandatory | Not stated in any of these studies. | |
Vehicle control (as appropriate). | Recommended | Not stated in six studies. | |
Positive and/or negative control (optional). | Recommended | Controls not stated in two studies. | |
Hobbs et al. | Were test acceptability criteria stated (e.g., mortality in controls must not exceed a certain percentage) OR | 0 or 5 | Not stated in any of these studies. |
Were the acceptability criteria inferred (e.g., test method used [USEPA, OECD, ASTM etc.] uses validation criteria) (award 2 marks). | 0, 2, or 5 | No standard tests were evaluated. | |
Were appropriate controls (e.g., no-toxicant control and/or solvent control) used? | 0 or 5 | Not stated in two studies. | |
Were parallel reference toxicant toxicity test conducted? | 0 or 4 | Not stated in any of these studies. | |
Schneider et al. | Were negative (where required) and positive controls (where required) included (give point also, when absent but not required)? | Mandatory, 0 or 1 | Not stated in two studies. |
Are the quantitative study results reliable (variability of controls and treatments)? | Recommended, 0, or 1 | Not stated in eight studies. | |
OECD guidelines | Evidence that controls met the overall survival acceptability standard of the test species. | Mandatory | The non-standard studies were not evaluated according to the OECD reporting requirements. |