Evaluation method | Evaluation criteria/question | Type of criteria/mark | Summary of evaluation results |
---|---|---|---|
Klimisch et al. | Data on concentration control analysis. | Recommended | Concentrations are not measured in four studies. |
Data on dosing the test substance (static, semi-static, flow through system). | Recommended | Not clearly stated, but could be understood for all but one study. | |
Data on the exposure period. | Recommended | Stated in all studies. | |
Durda and Preziosi | Dose (measured preferred). | Mandatory | Concentration ranges are presented for two studies, tested concentrations are lacking for two studies, concentrations are not measured in four studies. |
Administration route (environmentally relevant preferred). | Mandatory | Not clearly stated, but could be understood for all but one study. | |
Exposure schedule (intermittent, continuous or ad libitum). | Recommended | Not stated in one study. | |
Exposure duration. | Mandatory | Stated in all studies. | |
Hobbs et al. | Were the chemical concentrations measured? | 0 or 4 | Concentrations are not measured in four studies. |
Was the type of exposure (e.g., static, flow through) stated? | 0 or 4 | Not clearly stated, but could be understood for all but one study. | |
Was the duration of the exposure stated (e.g., 48 or 96 h)? | 0 or 10 | Stated in all studies. | |
Schneider et al. | Are doses administered or concentrations in application media given? | Mandatory, 0, or 1 | Concentration ranges are presented for two studies, tested concentrations are lacking for two studies. Concentrations are not measured in four studies. |
For inhalation studies and repeated dose toxicity studies only (give point for other study types): Were achieved concentrations analytically verified or was stability of the test substance otherwise ensured or made plausible? | Recommended, 0, or 1 | No inhalation and/or repeated dose toxicity study was evaluated. | |
Is the administration route given? | Mandatory, 0, or 1 | Not clearly stated, but could be understood for all but one study. | |
Are sufficient details of the administration scheme given to judge the study? | Recommended, 0, or 1 | Not stated in three studies. | |
Are frequency and duration of exposure as well as time-points of observations explained? | Mandatory, 0, or 1 | Stated in all studies. | |
OECD guidelines | Date of start of the test; test duration; test procedure used (e.g., semi-static or flow through); method of preparation of stock solutions; test concentrations, nominal and measured; the recovery efficiency of the method; the limit of quantification in the test matrix. | Mandatory | The non-standard studies were not evaluated according to the OECD reporting requirements. |