Skip to main content

Table 3 Scale structure of settlement of Pingnan Country

From: Spatial–temporal evolution and land use transition of rural settlements in mountainous counties

 

Classification (ha)

I (> 25)

II (15–25)

III (8–15)

IV (4–8)

V (2–4)

VI (1–2)

VII (0–1)

1985

Number

1

0

1

2

7

7

341

Ration (%)

0.28

0.00

0.28

0.56

1.95

1.95

94.99

Area (ha)

40.01

0

12.98

9.95

19.19

9.72

69.04

Ration (%)

24.87

0.00

8.07

6.18

11.93

6.04

42.91

1990

Number

1

0

1

2

9

7

338

Ration (%)

0.28

0.00

0.28

0.56

2.51

1.96

94.41

Area (ha)

41.26

0

12.98

10.52

25.19

9.26

68.03

Ration (%)

24.67

0.00

7.76

6.29

15.06

5.54

40.68

1995

Number

1

1

1

4

6

10

307

Ration (%)

0.30

0.30

0.30

1.21

1.82

3.03

93.03

Area/ha

73.70

17.94

8.95

18.86

17.5

14.35

61.93

Ration (%)

34.56

8.42

4.20

8.84

8.21

6.73

29.04

2000

Number

1

2

1

8

3

13

316

Ration (%)

0.29

0.58

0.29

2.33

0.87

3.78

91.86

Area (ha)

104.56

37.72

13.36

41.33

9.49

16.73

68.82

Ration (%)

35.81

12.92

4.58

14.15

3.25

5.73

23.57

2005

Number

1

2

1

7

4

20

318

Ration (%)

0.28

0.56

0.28

1.96

1.12

5.60

89.08

Area (ha)

145.7

38.88

8.35

38.18

24.98

27.47

71.87

Ration (%)

53.23

14.20

3.05

13.95

9.13

10.04

26.26

2010

Number

2

2

2

10

13

22

337

Ration (%)

0.52

0.52

0.52

2.58

3.35

5.67

86.86

Area (ha)

207.38

39.49

18.98

56.38

36.61

29.16

83.74

Ration (%)

43.96

8.37

4.02

11.95

7.76

6.18

17.75

2015

Number

2

1

5

10

12

46

400

Ration (%)

0.42

0.21

1.06

2.12

2.54

9.75

84.79

Area (ha)

280.63

22.54

54.46

57.74

33.11

61.82

110.31

Ration (%)

45.22

3.63

8.78

9.30

5.34

9.96

17.77

2020

Number

3

3

11

13

35

62

466

Ration (%)

0.51

0.51

1.85

2.19

5.90

10.46

78.58

Area (ha)

356.08

47.14

124.60

73.64

91.21

85.21

133.81

Ration (%)

39.06

5.17

13.67

8.08

10.00

9.35

14.68