Author(s) and published year | Study area | Methodology | Major findings |
---|---|---|---|
Rane et al. (Current study) | Nashik, India | GIS-based integrated method namely MIF technique is used | According to the result, solar radiation, relative humidity, and elevation are more sensitive as well as the dominant factors for optimal site selection of Solar PV power plants in the study area |
[25] | KahramanmaraÅŸ, Turkey | Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) technique namely AHP method | Four MCDM methods yielded effective results according to the proposed criteria, and most of the existing solar PV power plants match the convenient regions on the suitability map provided by AHP method |
[75] | India | GIS and MCDM techniques | Rajasthan state in India has the highest suitable land for the installation of solar plants (20,881Â km2) as well as wind farms (6323Â km2). The proposed model can be used for the development of policies related to renewable energy resources and the assessment of suitability |
[83] | Pakistan | AHP-fuzzy VIKOR method | The outcome of the sensitivity analysis revealed that obtained results are reliable and robust for the installation of solar PV power projects in Pakistan |
[29] | China | GIS-based analysis | The results show that there is a large area suitable for solar power stations in the northwestern regions with sufficient radiation, sparse surface vegetation and gentle surface gradient |
[80] | Mumbai, India | GIS-based image analysis of sample satellite images | Large scale deployment of Rooftop Solar PV Systems can provide 12.8–20% of the average daily demand and 31–60% of the morning peak demand for different months, even with median conversion efficiency panels. This method can be used to obtain the PV potential for any region |
[91] | Southern England | MCDM framework including AHP approach | This method can be used to assist appropriate site selection for onshore renewable energy projects across large geographical areas, helping to minimise their environmental impacts |