Skip to main content

Table 6 Assessment of plant response to abiotic stress under containment in GMP applications (numbers of studies in brackets)

From: Agronomic and phenotypic plant traits as indicators for environmental risks of genetically modified plants

Plant

Potato (2)

Maize (4)

Maize (1)

Containment

Climate chamber

Growth chamber (2), greenhouse (2)

Greenhouse

Abiotic stress assessed

Cold stress

Cold, heat, drought, salt stress

Drought stress

Artificially induced stress

Yes

Yes

Yes

Experimental design

Tubers placed on soil surface and tubers covered with soil (10 cm and 20 cm depth)

Plants grown in pots (V3 or V4 growth stage)

Plants grown in pots (V4/V5 growth stage)

Test regimes

2 experiments with low starting temperatures, gradually lowering to minimum temperatures followed by gradual thawing

3 stress treatments (mild, moderate, severe)

1 drought cycle

Parameters assessed

Survival rate of tubers (developing sprouts were assessed after 2–3 weeks at 18 ℃)

Growth and development parameters: plant height, growth stage, chlorophyll content, plant vigour, fresh weight, dry weight of above-ground biomass, necrosis (heat), leaf rolling (drought), electrical conductivity (salt)

Physiological parameters: photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, leaf extension rate (LER), ion leakage and relative water content (RWC)

Duration of stress in days

8–12

Cold: 8, Heat: 5, Drought: 15, Salt: 12

6