From: Rainfall modeling using two different neural networks improved by metaheuristic algorithms
Index | MAE, mm | NSE | PBIAS |
---|---|---|---|
Station (1) (Train) | |||
 MLP–HGSO | 0.687 | 0.95 | 0.17 |
 MLP–PSO | 0.727 | 0.89 | 0.22 |
 MLP–BA | 0.825 | 0.91 | 0.19 |
 RBFNN–HGSO | 0.722 | 0.93 | 0.16 |
 RBFNN–BA | 0.924 | 0.87 | 0.26 |
 RBFNN–PSO | 0.941 | 0.84 | 0.28 |
Station (1) (Test) | |||
 MLP–HGSO | 0.712 | 0.90 | 0.23 |
 MLP–PSO | 0.755 | 0.83 | 0.29 |
 MLP–BA | 0.765 | 0.85 | 0.25 |
 RBFNN–HGSO | 0.717 | 0.87 | 0.27 |
 RBFNN–BA | 0.865 | 0.81 | 0.31 |
 RBFNN–PSO | 0.891 | 0.80 | 0.35 |
Station (2) (Train) | |||
 MLP–HGSO | 0.683 | 0.97 | 0.15 |
 MLP–PSO | 0.725 | 0.90 | 0.21 |
 MLP–BA | 0.723 | 0.92 | 0.20 |
 RBFNN–HGSO | 0.691 | 0.93 | 0.17 |
 RBFNN–BA | 0.914 | 0.89 | 0.22 |
 RBFNN–PSO | 0.930 | 0.86 | 0.23 |
Station (2) (Test) | |||
 MLP–HGSO | 0.711 | 0.92 | 0.22 |
 MLP–PSO | 0.743 | 0.85 | 0.28 |
 MLP–BA | 0.742 | 0.89 | 0.26 |
 RBFNN–HGSO | 0.719 | 0.91 | 0.25 |
 RBFNN–BA | 0.863 | 0.83 | 0.31 |
 RBFNN–PSO | 0.890 | 0.82 | 0.32 |