Public perception of the performance of Czech forest ecosystem services

Environmental Sciences Europe

Table 4 Independent predictors of high scores in performance perception of selected forest ecosystem services

Predictors	Beta	Standard error	Exp (B)	Confidence interval	p-value
Cluster of all forest ecosystem services (R² = 0.069)
- Age of respondents	0.034	0.004	1.035	1.026‒1.043	< 0.001
- Female respondents (1 = female)	0.242	0.109	1.274	1.028‒1.577	0.027
- Frequency of forest visits (1 = frequently)	0.275	0.112	1.316	1.057‒1.639	0.014
Cluster of all provisioning services (R² = 0.043)
- Age of respondents	0.026	0.004	1.026	1.018‒1.034	< 0.001
- Female respondents (1 = female)	0.303	0.108	1.354	1.096‒1.673	0.005
Cluster of wood and non-wood forest products (R² = 0.035)
- Age of respondents	0.019	0.004	1.020	1.011‒1.028	< 0.001
- Female respondents (1 = female)	0.440	0.110	1.552	1.251‒1.925	< 0.001
Only non-wood forest products (R² = 0.029)
- Age of respondents	0.018	0.005	1.018	1.009‒1.027	< 0.001
- Female respondents (1 = female)	0.465	0.122	1.591	1.252‒2.023	< 0.001
Only wood production (R² = 0.027)
- Percent changes in broadleaved wood production	0.0002	0.0004	1.0002	1.00002–1.0002	0.011
- Age of respondents	0.020	0.004	1.020	1.012‒1.028	< 0.001

¹ Values of the final model and R² of Nagelkerke of the regression analysis were presented; significant level at p < 0.05