Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparative analysis for the ‘LoIs assessment’ criteria category

From: Management of links of interest in European Union expertise authorities dealing with plant protection products: comparative analysis and recommendations

Selected criteria for assessing the management of links of interest \ Competent Authorities

Actors

Center zone

North zone

South zone

Germany

Netherlands

Poland

Hungary

Czech Republic

Sweden

Finland

France

Italy

Bulgaria

BfR

Ctgb

Ministry of Agriculture

Nébih

ÚKZÚZ (CISTA)

KEMI

Tukes

Anses

Ministero della Salute

БAБX (BFSA)

Period of consultation of the authority’s website (month/year)

 

05/2022

03–04/2022

09/2022

04–05/2022

10/2022

04/2022

08/2022

03/2022

11/2022

12/2022

Receipt by the cnDAspe of a response letter (yes/no) and date of receipt

 

Yes, 29/06/2022

Yes, 29/06/2022

No

Yes, 24/06/2022

No

Yes, 24/06/2022

No

Yes, 22/06/2022

No

No

15

Duration of past period covered by the DoI (years)

 

nf

5

nf

nf

nf

nf

nf

5

3

nf

16

Duration of the past period taken into account for the analysis of LI (years)

 

nf

5

nf

nf

nf

nf

nf

5

3

nf

17

Management of LI differentiated according to the intensity of LI (YES/NO)

EE

nf

NO

nf

nf

nf

nf

nc

YES

nf

nf

IE

nf

NO

nf

nf

nf

nf

nf

YES

nf

nf

MO

nf

NO

nf

nf

nf

nf

nf

YES

nf

nf

  1. DoI(s) Declaration(s) of Interest, LoI(s) Link(s) of Interest, nf not found (using our systematic collection method), nc not concerned, e.g., Authorities not requesting any external expert, in any evaluation, any expertise, any committee, any scientific council or equivalent, etc. EE external expert, IE internal expert, MO management officer; numbers: see the specific description of each criterion in the left column of the tables